| |
Main
Date: 15 Dec 2006 14:43:42
From: storman99
Subject: i im the best player online
|
no proof yet
onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
poker tracker are some other software.
if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
being up $3200. are its rigged
.
prove it and prove me wrong
this was from another reply
thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
proof i need. .
but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
.
so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
|
|
| |
Date: 16 Dec
From: Max Coin
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 2:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
>
> hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> poker tracker are some other software.
> if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> being up $3200. are its rigged
>
> ..
> prove it and prove me wrong
>
>
> this was from another reply
>
> thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
>
> they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> proof i need. .
>
> but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> ..
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
Dude, didn't you get enough shit from your previous post?
_______________________________________________________________
Watch Lists, Block Lists, Favorites - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 19:16:31
From: Scott/sjakma
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
I do not think it really matters what people write. The guy is
illiterate..
Scott
----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 17:02:46
From: number6
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
storman99 wrote:
You misspelled breast ...
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 16:39:58
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
dumb ass. i didnt know you had to have writing skills to play poker
Kinnipak wrote:
> On Dec 15 2006 4:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
>
> > no proof yet
> >
> >
> > onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> > over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
> >
> > hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> > is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
> >
> > hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> > have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> > poker tracker are some other software.
> > if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> > being up $3200. are its rigged
> >
> > .
> > prove it and prove me wrong
> >
> >
> > this was from another reply
> >
> > thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> > playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> > a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> > then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
> >
> > they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> > tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> > proof i need. .
> >
> > but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> > .
> > so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
>
> Jesus. You're not even the best when it comes to playing with
> yourself...let alone poker...
>
> and I know SHIT about playing online poker.....
>
> difficult to type with one hand huh?
>
> Keep at it..you'll get there...it's not that hard....
>
> well......
>
> duh....
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2006 01:44:27
From: kurtissimo
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 8:39 PM, storman99 wrote:
> dumb ass. i didnt know you had to have writing skills to play poker
You don't need to have writing skills to play poker.
However, YOU DO NEED to have writing skills to be taken seriously in an
online poker forum.
Why is this surprising to a sane adult?
______________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Dec 2006 15:47:12
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:44:27 -0800, "kurtissimo" <ad110af@webnntp.invalid >
wrote:
>On Dec 15 2006 8:39 PM, storman99 wrote:
>> dumb ass. i didnt know you had to have writing skills to play poker
>You don't need to have writing skills to play poker.
>However, YOU DO NEED to have writing skills to be taken seriously in an
>online poker forum.
>Why is this surprising to a sane adult?
It isn't. It may be surprising to the person you're talking to, though.
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 16:21:43
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
oy vey, didn't I already read this thread?
On Dec 15 2006 5:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
>
> hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> poker tracker are some other software.
> if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> being up $3200. are its rigged
>
> .
> prove it and prove me wrong
>
>
> this was from another reply
>
> thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
>
> they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> proof i need. .
>
> but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> .
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 16:10:40
From: Kinnipak
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 4:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
>
> hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> poker tracker are some other software.
> if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> being up $3200. are its rigged
>
> .
> prove it and prove me wrong
>
>
> this was from another reply
>
> thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
>
> they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> proof i need. .
>
> but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> .
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
Jesus. You're not even the best when it comes to playing with
yourself...let alone poker...
and I know SHIT about playing online poker.....
difficult to type with one hand huh?
Keep at it..you'll get there...it's not that hard....
well......
duh....
______________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 15:57:35
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
a man beaten you must be a rookie playing a few 1000 hands is'nt
nothing
as for alans reply . how do you know you are up $3200 . your
right i dont know . i called my bank to get my mothly statement
and they said we think you got $100 in it no wait $150 are so hold
on theres some change on the floor that could be yours. yep .10cents
of it i think is yours . so you have about $150.10 . we think .
your right i dont know
your not very smart dumb ass alan
A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 06 23:24:19 GMT, Super Steamer <43071968@recpoker.com> wrote:
>
> >On Dec 15 2006 2:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
>
> >> no proof yet
>
> >> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> >> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> >> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
>
> >A. I find it hard to believe that YOU are up.
> >B. Being up 3200.00 after paying 40K in rake isn't very impressive.
>
> This guy is a joke. I am mediocre as far as winning players go, and the
> amount I have paid in rake (from 1/2 to 2/4 with some 3/6 and 5/10)
> is significantly less than my net gain. I'd say it's about 40/60. That's
> a lot of rake, but less than that is barely winning.
>
> I doubt this drooling idiot's math is any better than the word salad
> he calls language.
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 23:50:02
From: I_AM_EVIL
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 6:57 PM, storman99 wrote:
> a man beaten you must be a rookie playing a few 1000 hands is'nt
> nothing
>
> as for alans reply . how do you know you are up $3200 . your
> right i dont know . i called my bank to get my mothly statement
> and they said we think you got $100 in it no wait $150 are so hold
> on theres some change on the floor that could be yours. yep .10cents
> of it i think is yours . so you have about $150.10 . we think .
>
> your right i dont know
>
> your not very smart dumb ass alan
>
> A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 06 23:24:19 GMT, Super Steamer <43071968@recpoker.com>
wrote:
> >
> > >On Dec 15 2006 2:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
> >
> > >> no proof yet
> >
> > >> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> > >> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
> >
> > >> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> >
> > >A. I find it hard to believe that YOU are up.
> > >B. Being up 3200.00 after paying 40K in rake isn't very impressive.
> >
> > This guy is a joke. I am mediocre as far as winning players go, and the
> > amount I have paid in rake (from 1/2 to 2/4 with some 3/6 and 5/10)
> > is significantly less than my net gain. I'd say it's about 40/60. That's
> > a lot of rake, but less than that is barely winning.
> >
> > I doubt this drooling idiot's math is any better than the word salad
> > he calls language.
One thing that we do know for certain is you don't know the difference
between OR/ARE and YOUR/YOU'RE.
The 2nd Amendment........America's TRUE Homeland Security.
------
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 15:41:36
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
your right 3200 is'nt impressive because its rigged.
Super Steamer wrote:
> On Dec 15 2006 2:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
>
> > no proof yet
> >
> >
> > onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> > over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
> >
> > hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
>
> A. I find it hard to believe that YOU are up.
> B. Being up 3200.00 after paying 40K in rake isn't very impressive.
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 19:01:04
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
steamer if you have played over 200.000 hands and is up so much money
then take a screen shot of your proof
if not then shut the f--k up
Super Steamer wrote:
> On Dec 15 2006 3:41 PM, storman99 wrote:
>
> > your right 3200 is'nt impressive because its rigged.
> >
> It must be rigged in my favor then.
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 22:47:37
From: Bill Ricardi
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
Super Steamer wrote:
> On Dec 15 2006 7:01 PM, storman99 wrote:
>
> > steamer if you have played over 200.000 hands and is up so much money
> > then take a screen shot of your proof
> >
> > if not then shut the f--k up
>
> Here is the screen shot of my proof, this ought to shut you up!
>
> http://www.seriesam.com/barks/go_slowly_12.jpg
And here's mine. I'm a fukin zillonair!
http://www.partypokertutor.com/fakefttable2.jpg
|
| | | | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 23:57:13
From: I_AM_EVIL
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 16 2006 1:47 AM, Bill Ricardi wrote:
> Super Steamer wrote:
> > On Dec 15 2006 7:01 PM, storman99 wrote:
> >
> > > steamer if you have played over 200.000 hands and is up so much money
> > > then take a screen shot of your proof
> > >
> > > if not then shut the f--k up
> >
> > Here is the screen shot of my proof, this ought to shut you up!
> >
> > http://www.seriesam.com/barks/go_slowly_12.jpg
>
> And here's mine. I'm a fukin zillonair!
>
> http://www.partypokertutor.com/fakefttable2.jpg
When you request a cashout do they actually send you the watch and
jewels or do they give you market value? Also, if you collect enough
rubies can you trade up for diamonds?
The 2nd Amendment........America's TRUE Homeland Security.
---
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Dec
From: Super Steamer
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 7:01 PM, storman99 wrote:
> steamer if you have played over 200.000 hands and is up so much money
> then take a screen shot of your proof
>
> if not then shut the f--k up
Here is the screen shot of my proof, this ought to shut you up!
http://www.seriesam.com/barks/go_slowly_12.jpg
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 20:30:40
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 11:20 PM, Super Steamroflmaoer wrote:
> On Dec 15 2006 7:01 PM, storman99 wrote:
>
> > steamer if you have played over 200.000 hands and is up so much money
> > then take a screen shot of your proof
> >
> > if not then shut the f--k up
>
> Here is the screen shot of my proof, this ought to shut you up!
>
> http://www.seriesam.com/barks/go_slowly_12.jpg
roflmao
thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 16 Dec 2006 07:36:00
From: Bill Ricardi
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
I_AM_EVIL wrote:
> > And here's mine. I'm a fukin zillonair!
> >
> > http://www.partypokertutor.com/fakefttable2.jpg
>
>
> When you request a cashout do they actually send you the watch and
> jewels or do they give you market value? Also, if you collect enough
> rubies can you trade up for diamonds?
They send you the watch and jewels, but give you cash equivalent for
the dabloons. And yes, if you collect enough rubies, you can trade up
to some emeralds, then diamonds!
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec
From: Super Steamer
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 3:41 PM, storman99 wrote:
> your right 3200 is'nt impressive because its rigged.
>
It must be rigged in my favor then.
_______________________________________________________________
Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 23:24:19
From: Super Steamer
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Dec 15 2006 2:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
A. I find it hard to believe that YOU are up.
B. Being up 3200.00 after paying 40K in rake isn't very impressive.
_______________________________________________________________
New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 18:32:14
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 06 23:24:19 GMT, Super Steamer <43071968@recpoker.com > wrote:
>On Dec 15 2006 2:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
>> no proof yet
>> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
>> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
>A. I find it hard to believe that YOU are up.
>B. Being up 3200.00 after paying 40K in rake isn't very impressive.
This guy is a joke. I am mediocre as far as winning players go, and the
amount I have paid in rake (from 1/2 to 2/4 with some 3/6 and 5/10)
is significantly less than my net gain. I'd say it's about 40/60. That's
a lot of rake, but less than that is barely winning.
I doubt this drooling idiot's math is any better than the word salad
he calls language.
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 15:16:42
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
You're a fucking nitwit is what you are. Go find somewhere else to play
the role of dipshit.
Morphy
http://donkeymanifesto.blogspot.com
----
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 15:04:14
From: Alan Gilbert aka brewmaster
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
How do you know you are up $3200? You obviously failed English, so you
probably failed math too. Are you even sure you are playing poker online,
and not Uno?
On Dec 15 2006 2:43 PM, storman99 wrote:
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
>
> hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> poker tracker are some other software.
> if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> being up $3200. are its rigged
>
> .
> prove it and prove me wrong
>
>
> this was from another reply
>
> thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
>
> they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> proof i need. .
>
> but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> .
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
------
brewmaster at brewcam dot com
"Once in awhile you can get shown the light in the strangest of places if
you look at it right" -RH
------
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 10:20:24
From: Bill Ricardi
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
storman99 wrote:
> > You are wrong. It's ok to be wrong, but don't say you're "sure" when you are
> > not.
> show proof and i will respect you
What you have to ask yourself is: What have you done, exactly, that
your respect might be worth earning?
The only thing rigged here is your skill level and game selection. The
difference between 100, 200, and 400 NL is so fucking huge, that
there's no possible way you should be up only 3200 after paying 40K in
rake, if you were following sane bankroll rules, and you were at the
correct skill level to play those games.
.50 / 1 NL for 100 bucks: Bankroll should be 2K.
1 / 2 NL for 200 bucks: Bankroll should be 4K.
2 / 4 NL for 400 bucks; Bankroll should be 8K.
So you're telling us that your bankroll has hovered between 2K and 8K
for 40K worth of rake? That means you bounced up and down and
overextended yourself more than a Thai acrobat turned hooker.
You're either much worse than you think you are, or you're a troll who
can't post reasonable enough numbers to keep me interested (in case the
fake screen shot wasn't enough of a clue). There's yer proof.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 09:34:49
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
show proof and i will respect you
BillB wrote:
> "storman99" <storman99@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:1166370298.591416.71400@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> > bill i think you need lessons im sure youre not up any money online .
> > and if you are.
> > you have less then 25.000k hands played. the poker sites will take it
> > back and teach you a lesson .
> > its rigged
>
> You are wrong. It's ok to be wrong, but don't say you're "sure" when you are
> not.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 07:44:58
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
bill i think you need lessons im sure youre not up any money online .
and if you are.
you have less then 25.000k hands played. the poker sites will take it
back and teach you a lesson .
its rigged
BillB wrote:
> "storman99" <storman99@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:1166222622.524210.24910@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
> > no proof yet
> >
> >
> > onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> > over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
> >
> > hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> > is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
> >
> > hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> > have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> > poker tracker are some other software.
> > if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> > being up $3200. are its rigged
> >
> > .
> > prove it and prove me wrong
> >
> >
> > this was from another reply
> >
> > thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> > playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> > a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> > then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
> >
> > they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> > tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> > proof i need. .
> >
> > but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> > .
> > so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
>
> I don't see the relevance of the profit/rake ratio. All that matters is
> whether you are satisfied with your profit (or loss, for that matter) for
> the time invested.. If I make $10/hr playing do I really care if Pokerstars
> makes $40/hr if there is no better alternative? No. Either I am satisfied
> with $10/hr or I'm not. If I'm not I should do something else.
>
> That said, $3,200 profit over 500,000 hands is not good at all. You need
> lessons.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 16:35:47
From: BillB
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
"storman99" <storman99@earthlink.net > wrote in message
news:1166370298.591416.71400@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> bill i think you need lessons im sure youre not up any money online .
> and if you are.
> you have less then 25.000k hands played. the poker sites will take it
> back and teach you a lesson .
> its rigged
You are wrong. It's ok to be wrong, but don't say you're "sure" when you are
not.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 13:34:30
From: BillB
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
"storman99" <storman99@earthlink.net > wrote in message
news:1166222622.524210.24910@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
>
> hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> poker tracker are some other software.
> if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> being up $3200. are its rigged
>
> .
> prove it and prove me wrong
>
>
> this was from another reply
>
> thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
>
> they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> proof i need. .
>
> but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> .
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
I don't see the relevance of the profit/rake ratio. All that matters is
whether you are satisfied with your profit (or loss, for that matter) for
the time invested.. If I make $10/hr playing do I really care if Pokerstars
makes $40/hr if there is no better alternative? No. Either I am satisfied
with $10/hr or I'm not. If I'm not I should do something else.
That said, $3,200 profit over 500,000 hands is not good at all. You need
lessons.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 18:42:29
From: Bill Ricardi
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
storman99 wrote:
> good call i respect that
> your right i have hovered between 2k and 8k (that right on the money my
> high was 8k)after my first 100k hands.
> overexstending myself what do you mean
I mean you probably aren't good enough for 2/4 NL and moved up too
fast. Had you stayed at 1/2, you'd probably have steadily grown your
knowledge and bankroll. Had you not been stubborn and played at your
highest limits too often, you'd probably be up well over 18K, with less
rake paid and more time off.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 17:57:38
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
.
storman99 wrote:
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
>
> hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> poker tracker are some other software.
> if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> being up $3200. are its rigged
>
> .
> prove it and prove me wrong
>
>
> this was from another reply
>
> thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
>
> they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> proof i need. .
>
> but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> .
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 16:06:17
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
?
storman99 wrote:
> good call i respect that
> your right i have hovered between 2k and 8k (that right on the money my
> high was 8k)after my first 100k hands.
> overexstending myself what do you mean
>
>
>
> Bill Ricardi wrote:
> > storman99 wrote:
> > > > You are wrong. It's ok to be wrong, but don't say you're "sure" when you are
> > > > not.
> >
> > > show proof and i will respect you
> >
> > What you have to ask yourself is: What have you done, exactly, that
> > your respect might be worth earning?
> >
> > The only thing rigged here is your skill level and game selection. The
> > difference between 100, 200, and 400 NL is so fucking huge, that
> > there's no possible way you should be up only 3200 after paying 40K in
> > rake, if you were following sane bankroll rules, and you were at the
> > correct skill level to play those games.
> >
> > .50 / 1 NL for 100 bucks: Bankroll should be 2K.
> >
> > 1 / 2 NL for 200 bucks: Bankroll should be 4K.
> >
> > 2 / 4 NL for 400 bucks; Bankroll should be 8K.
> >
> >
> > So you're telling us that your bankroll has hovered between 2K and 8K
> > for 40K worth of rake? That means you bounced up and down and
> > overextended yourself more than a Thai acrobat turned hooker.
> >
> >
> > You're either much worse than you think you are, or you're a troll who
> > can't post reasonable enough numbers to keep me interested (in case the
> > fake screen shot wasn't enough of a clue). There's yer proof.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 13:19:37
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
?
storman99 wrote:
> good call i respect that
> your right i have hovered between 2k and 8k (that right on the money my
> high was 8k)after my first 100k hands.
> overexstending myself what do you mean
>
>
>
> Bill Ricardi wrote:
> > storman99 wrote:
> > > > You are wrong. It's ok to be wrong, but don't say you're "sure" when you are
> > > > not.
> >
> > > show proof and i will respect you
> >
> > What you have to ask yourself is: What have you done, exactly, that
> > your respect might be worth earning?
> >
> > The only thing rigged here is your skill level and game selection. The
> > difference between 100, 200, and 400 NL is so fucking huge, that
> > there's no possible way you should be up only 3200 after paying 40K in
> > rake, if you were following sane bankroll rules, and you were at the
> > correct skill level to play those games.
> >
> > .50 / 1 NL for 100 bucks: Bankroll should be 2K.
> >
> > 1 / 2 NL for 200 bucks: Bankroll should be 4K.
> >
> > 2 / 4 NL for 400 bucks; Bankroll should be 8K.
> >
> >
> > So you're telling us that your bankroll has hovered between 2K and 8K
> > for 40K worth of rake? That means you bounced up and down and
> > overextended yourself more than a Thai acrobat turned hooker.
> >
> >
> > You're either much worse than you think you are, or you're a troll who
> > can't post reasonable enough numbers to keep me interested (in case the
> > fake screen shot wasn't enough of a clue). There's yer proof.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 13:19:33
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
?
storman99 wrote:
> good call i respect that
> your right i have hovered between 2k and 8k (that right on the money my
> high was 8k)after my first 100k hands.
> overexstending myself what do you mean
>
>
>
> Bill Ricardi wrote:
> > storman99 wrote:
> > > > You are wrong. It's ok to be wrong, but don't say you're "sure" when you are
> > > > not.
> >
> > > show proof and i will respect you
> >
> > What you have to ask yourself is: What have you done, exactly, that
> > your respect might be worth earning?
> >
> > The only thing rigged here is your skill level and game selection. The
> > difference between 100, 200, and 400 NL is so fucking huge, that
> > there's no possible way you should be up only 3200 after paying 40K in
> > rake, if you were following sane bankroll rules, and you were at the
> > correct skill level to play those games.
> >
> > .50 / 1 NL for 100 bucks: Bankroll should be 2K.
> >
> > 1 / 2 NL for 200 bucks: Bankroll should be 4K.
> >
> > 2 / 4 NL for 400 bucks; Bankroll should be 8K.
> >
> >
> > So you're telling us that your bankroll has hovered between 2K and 8K
> > for 40K worth of rake? That means you bounced up and down and
> > overextended yourself more than a Thai acrobat turned hooker.
> >
> >
> > You're either much worse than you think you are, or you're a troll who
> > can't post reasonable enough numbers to keep me interested (in case the
> > fake screen shot wasn't enough of a clue). There's yer proof.
|
| |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 11:23:15
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
good call i respect that
your right i have hovered between 2k and 8k (that right on the money my
high was 8k)after my first 100k hands.
overexstending myself what do you mean
Bill Ricardi wrote:
> storman99 wrote:
> > > You are wrong. It's ok to be wrong, but don't say you're "sure" when you are
> > > not.
>
> > show proof and i will respect you
>
> What you have to ask yourself is: What have you done, exactly, that
> your respect might be worth earning?
>
> The only thing rigged here is your skill level and game selection. The
> difference between 100, 200, and 400 NL is so fucking huge, that
> there's no possible way you should be up only 3200 after paying 40K in
> rake, if you were following sane bankroll rules, and you were at the
> correct skill level to play those games.
>
> .50 / 1 NL for 100 bucks: Bankroll should be 2K.
>
> 1 / 2 NL for 200 bucks: Bankroll should be 4K.
>
> 2 / 4 NL for 400 bucks; Bankroll should be 8K.
>
>
> So you're telling us that your bankroll has hovered between 2K and 8K
> for 40K worth of rake? That means you bounced up and down and
> overextended yourself more than a Thai acrobat turned hooker.
>
>
> You're either much worse than you think you are, or you're a troll who
> can't post reasonable enough numbers to keep me interested (in case the
> fake screen shot wasn't enough of a clue). There's yer proof.
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 18:14:00
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
i dont think i did
as for being rigged it is
about 4 weeks a year i play on another computer about 20.000k hands
total and all 4 of those weeks i have lost (rigged)
as or $200nl one of those weeks i lost $3000 and another week $2200 (
the best 5 players in the world as a group playing my hands would have
lost) why
because pocket AAs KKs QQs and AK all showed losses thats about 300
hands .
pocket AAs only won 38% of the time. now thats rigged
O pocket JJs did show a $385.00 profit and 8 9 suited a $545.00 (wait
maybe its not rigged LOL)
$100nl i lost over $1000 one of those weeks same thing big starting
hands showed loses.
thats just one of many
will post all my others later on.
Bill Ricardi wrote:
> storman99 wrote:
>
> > so i dont think i moved up to fast playing almost 250.000k hands before
> > moving up.
>
> Given your results, sadly, I think you have. Stats don't lie.
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 16:12:05
From: Bill Ricardi
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
storman99 wrote:
> so i dont think i moved up to fast playing almost 250.000k hands before
> moving up.
Given your results, sadly, I think you have. Stats don't lie.
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 16:05:09
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
i Knew you would say that. most of all the money i won was $400NL
with over 100.000 hands played.
up about $4,000
as for $200nl poker tracker shows im up over $7,000 with about 150.000k
hands played.
so i dont think i moved up to fast playing almost 250.000k hands before
moving up.
please reply bill
then i will tell you why i think its rigged
thanks.
.
ps i do hope its not rigged but!
Bill Ricardi wrote:
> storman99 wrote:
> > good call i respect that
> > your right i have hovered between 2k and 8k (that right on the money my
> > high was 8k)after my first 100k hands.
> > overexstending myself what do you mean
>
>
> I mean you probably aren't good enough for 2/4 NL and moved up too
> fast. Had you stayed at 1/2, you'd probably have steadily grown your
> knowledge and bankroll. Had you not been stubborn and played at your
> highest limits too often, you'd probably be up well over 18K, with less
> rake paid and more time off.
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 15:59:20
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
i Knew you would say that. most of all the money i won was $400NL
with over 100.000 hands played.
up about $4,000
as for $200nl poker tracker shows im up over $7,000 with about 150.000k
hands played.
so i dont think i moved up to fast playing almost 250.000k hands before
moving up.
please reply bill
then i will tell you why i think its rigged
thanks.
.
ps i do hope its rigged but!
Bill Ricardi wrote:
> storman99 wrote:
> > good call i respect that
> > your right i have hovered between 2k and 8k (that right on the money my
> > high was 8k)after my first 100k hands.
> > overexstending myself what do you mean
>
>
> I mean you probably aren't good enough for 2/4 NL and moved up too
> fast. Had you stayed at 1/2, you'd probably have steadily grown your
> knowledge and bankroll. Had you not been stubborn and played at your
> highest limits too often, you'd probably be up well over 18K, with less
> rake paid and more time off.
|
| | |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 04:29:31
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
if you are youre only up about 2 to 4 cents a hand
or youre not a USA player
so prove it
ben carr wrote:
> I have never had a losing session playing online. Never.
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 02:15:55
From: ben carr
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
I have never played one hand of online poker in my life. That is how I
have never had a losing session.
|
| | |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 02:29:17
From: ben carr
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
I have never had a losing session playing online. Never.
|
| |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 04:35:27
From: storman99
Subject: Re: i im the best player online
|
o
storman99 wrote:
> no proof yet
>
>
> onlie sites or rigged i need proof its not rigged. i have played
> over 1/2million hands online up about $3200 thats less then 0ne penny a
>
> hand. i have paid out over $40.000 in rake.
> is there anyone i mean anyone out there that has played over 200.000k
>
> hands of 100, 200, are 400nl games and is up more then the rake they
> have paid. if so how many hands and how much. i need proof from
> poker tracker are some other software.
> if no one can prove it then i must be one of the best players online
> being up $3200. are its rigged
>
> .
> prove it and prove me wrong
>
>
> this was from another reply
>
> thats a little over two years of playing. theres alot of players
> playing right now 2000 to 3000k hands a day thats 600.000 to 1 million
> a year. but whats funny is they never last a year 4 to 6 months tops
> then there gone ( they may change there name after awhile ) but i think
>
> they know they cant win so they quit . a coulpe of more months
> tracking then with over 10 million hands recorded that my be all the
> proof i need. .
>
> but as for now has anyone played over 200.000k hands and is up money
> .
> so far im the best online player there is being up $3200
|
|
