| |
Main
Date: 20 Dec 2006 00:07:42
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Would you let this person play poker on your account?
|
"newhizzle" is apparently Mark Newhouse's account being played
by Brandi in a huge $30K money dumping session.
POKERSTARS GAME #7396709777: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($10/$20) - 2006/12/11 - 11:40:37
(ET)
Table 'Aegina II' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: LittleZen ($2715 in chips)
Seat 2: twin-caracas ($3976.50 in chips)
Seat 3: Keesbussum ($4720 in chips)
Seat 5: Shifty1768 ($7270.50 in chips)
Seat 6: newhizzle ($1205.50 in chips)
LittleZen: posts small blind $10
twin-caracas: posts big blind $20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to newhizzle [5d 7d]
Keesbussum: folds
Shifty1768: folds
newhizzle: calls $20
LittleZen: folds
twin-caracas: checks
*** FLOP *** [As Ad Ac]
twin-caracas: checks
newhizzle: checks
*** TURN *** [As Ad Ac] [6d]
twin-caracas: checks
newhizzle: checks
*** RIVER *** [As Ad Ac 6d] [4d]
twin-caracas: bets $60
newhizzle: raises $60 to $120
twin-caracas: raises $360 to $480
newhizzle: calls $360
*** SHOW DOWN ***
twin-caracas: shows [3d Ah] (four of a kind, Aces)
newhizzle: mucks hand
twin-caracas collected $1008 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1010
|
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 21:46:12
From: Alan Gilbert aka brewmaster
Subject: Re: Would you let this person play poker on your account?
|
On Dec 19 2006 9:07 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> "newhizzle" is apparently Mark Newhouse's account being played
> by Brandi in a huge $30K money dumping session.
>
I had twin-caracas at my table in one of the tourneys in the 2005 WSOP.
He's a very nice guy, and a VERY GOOD poker player. I wouldn't put him on
a bluff in this situation EVER. She's a complete moron. She had a flush,
LOLOLOL.
> POKERSTARS GAME #7396709777: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($10/$20) - 2006/12/11 -
11:40:37
> (ET)
> Table 'Aegina II' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
> Seat 1: LittleZen ($2715 in chips)
> Seat 2: twin-caracas ($3976.50 in chips)
> Seat 3: Keesbussum ($4720 in chips)
> Seat 5: Shifty1768 ($7270.50 in chips)
> Seat 6: newhizzle ($1205.50 in chips)
> LittleZen: posts small blind $10
> twin-caracas: posts big blind $20
> *** HOLE CARDS ***
> Dealt to newhizzle [5d 7d]
> Keesbussum: folds
> Shifty1768: folds
> newhizzle: calls $20
> LittleZen: folds
> twin-caracas: checks
> *** FLOP *** [As Ad Ac]
> twin-caracas: checks
> newhizzle: checks
> *** TURN *** [As Ad Ac] [6d]
> twin-caracas: checks
> newhizzle: checks
> *** RIVER *** [As Ad Ac 6d] [4d]
> twin-caracas: bets $60
> newhizzle: raises $60 to $120
> twin-caracas: raises $360 to $480
> newhizzle: calls $360
> *** SHOW DOWN ***
> twin-caracas: shows [3d Ah] (four of a kind, Aces)
> newhizzle: mucks hand
> twin-caracas collected $1008 from pot
> *** SUMMARY ***
> Total pot $1010
|
| | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 02:26:31
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Would you let this person play poker on your account?
|
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:46:12 -0800, "Alan Gilbert aka brewmaster"
<ae2dad2@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>On Dec 19 2006 9:07 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
>> "newhizzle" is apparently Mark Newhouse's account being played
>> by Brandi in a huge $30K money dumping session.
>I had twin-caracas at my table in one of the tourneys in the 2005 WSOP.
>He's a very nice guy, and a VERY GOOD poker player. I wouldn't put him on
>a bluff in this situation EVER. She's a complete moron. She had a flush,
>LOLOLOL.
Even if you did put him on a bluff, would anyone who could even spell
poker put him on a bluff you could beat by calling with 7 high? Amazing.
OTOH she may have had only four to her flush, but it was four to a
STRAIGHT flush. Maybe she thought you get something for that.
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 02:27:30
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Would you let this person play poker on your account?
|
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:26:31 -0500, A Man Beaten by Jacks <nobody@fool.foo >
wrote:
>OTOH she may have had only four to her flush, but it was four to a
>STRAIGHT flush. Maybe she thought you get something for that.
Oh, I missed the Ad. Still, doesn't make it any better of a play.
It has to have been the most worthless flush in existence.
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Dec 18:02:11
From: Nick Wool
Subject: Re: Would you let this person play poker on your account?
|
On Dec 20 2006 7:27 AM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:26:31 -0500, A Man Beaten by Jacks
> wrote:
>
> >OTOH she may have had only four to her flush, but it was four to a
> >STRAIGHT flush. Maybe she thought you get something for that.
>
> Oh, I missed the Ad. Still, doesn't make it any better of a play.
> It has to have been the most worthless flush in existence.
You might call if you think K high is trying to buy the pot, but to raise and
then calling a decent reraise? I would even do that with anything less than
JJ/QQ here....
Btw, isn't the stack a bit shallow for 10/20 (1205!)? What's with these poker
'names'? Playing with scared money?
_______________________________________________________________
The Largest Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 17:44:20
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Would you let this person play poker on your account?
|
On Wed, 20 Dec 06 18:02:11 GMT, Nick Wool <43079532@recpoker.com > wrote:
>Btw, isn't the stack a bit shallow for 10/20 (1205!)? What's with these poker
>'names'? Playing with scared money?
Considering she donked off $30K in that session, it was probably just as
well she played scared. It wasn't actually newhizzle, it was Brandi on his
account. (Ho'z in ur account dumping ur chips!)
|
|
