| |
Main
Date: 28 Nov 2006 04:03:49
From:
Subject: Winning Roulette System Revealed
|
Let me explain this approach to you. In many ways, investing in the
stock market, the commodities markets, or buying and selling options is
very similar to playing the game of Roulette. Both have certain
probabilities to winning and losing.
In statistics, we consider the commodities market, as well as the game
of Roulette to be zero-sum games. That means the amount of money you
win is equal to the amount I lose. That way, the sum of all wins and
losses is zero. If you bet red and you win, the house loses the exact
amount equal to your wager. If you bet black and the Roulette decision
is red, you lose your wager. In the end, it is a zero-sum.
The field of statistics grew tremendously during and after World War
II. The United States and the United Kingdom were the dominant force in
advancing this field. After the war, most of the newfound principles
were applied to the business world. We find statistics in management,
stock market forecasting, economic planning, and even sociology.
Zero-sum means that whenever you win, the house loses -- there cannot
be two winners. Now you may asked, "But what about the house edge?
Doesn't the house always win in the long-run? How can you beat Roulette
consistently?"
Well, all good questions. In fact, these are the same questions my
partner and I asked ourselves as well. Whenever we compare playing
Roulette to investing in the stock market, we find that your brokerage
fees are like the house advantage. Without paying your broker a
commission, you are not allowed to play the stock market game. On that
same token you are not allowed to play the Roulette game, if you are
unwilling to pay the house its commission, i.e. the house edge.
http://casinosruns.blogspot.com/#
|
|
| |
Date: 28 Nov 2006 09:20:36
From: John_Brian_K
Subject: Re: Winning Roulette System Revealed
|
ukqytsirlhyw@yahoo.com wrote:
> Let me explain this approach to you. In many ways, investing in the
> stock market, the commodities markets, or buying and selling options is
> very similar to playing the game of Roulette. Both have certain
> probabilities to winning and losing.
> In statistics, we consider the commodities market, as well as the game
> of Roulette to be zero-sum games. That means the amount of money you
> win is equal to the amount I lose. That way, the sum of all wins and
> losses is zero. If you bet red and you win, the house loses the exact
> amount equal to your wager. If you bet black and the Roulette decision
> is red, you lose your wager. In the end, it is a zero-sum.
> The field of statistics grew tremendously during and after World War
> II. The United States and the United Kingdom were the dominant force in
> advancing this field. After the war, most of the newfound principles
> were applied to the business world. We find statistics in management,
> stock market forecasting, economic planning, and even sociology.
> Zero-sum means that whenever you win, the house loses -- there cannot
> be two winners. Now you may asked, "But what about the house edge?
> Doesn't the house always win in the long-run? How can you beat Roulette
> consistently?"
> Well, all good questions. In fact, these are the same questions my
> partner and I asked ourselves as well. Whenever we compare playing
> Roulette to investing in the stock market, we find that your brokerage
> fees are like the house advantage. Without paying your broker a
> commission, you are not allowed to play the stock market game. On that
> same token you are not allowed to play the Roulette game, if you are
> unwilling to pay the house its commission, i.e. the house edge.
> http://casinosruns.blogspot.com/#
Bet equal amounts on first third and second third or second third and
third third or first third and third third and DONOT waver always stay
with the same betting amounts and you will eventually win. Not very
exciting, but...
if its 15.00 minimum you have a 66% chance to win 15.00 and a 33%
chance to lose 30.00
OH SHIT wait this doesnt work!!! oops never mind @ least you will come
out not losing.
Sorry I am a moron.
|
| |
Date: 28 Nov 2006 08:04:23
From: burt
Subject: Re: Winning Roulette System Revealed
|
ukqytsirlhyw@yahoo.com wrote:
> Let me explain this approach to you. In many ways, investing in the
> stock market, the commodities markets, or buying and selling options is
> very similar to playing the game of Roulette. Both have certain
> probabilities to winning and losing.
> In statistics, we consider the commodities market, as well as the game
> of Roulette to be zero-sum games. That means the amount of money you
> win is equal to the amount I lose. That way, the sum of all wins and
> losses is zero. If you bet red and you win, the house loses the exact
> amount equal to your wager. If you bet black and the Roulette decision
> is red, you lose your wager. In the end, it is a zero-sum.
> The field of statistics grew tremendously during and after World War
> II. The United States and the United Kingdom were the dominant force in
> advancing this field. After the war, most of the newfound principles
> were applied to the business world. We find statistics in management,
> stock market forecasting, economic planning, and even sociology.
> Zero-sum means that whenever you win, the house loses -- there cannot
> be two winners. Now you may asked, "But what about the house edge?
> Doesn't the house always win in the long-run? How can you beat Roulette
> consistently?"
> Well, all good questions. In fact, these are the same questions my
> partner and I asked ourselves as well. Whenever we compare playing
> Roulette to investing in the stock market, we find that your brokerage
> fees are like the house advantage. Without paying your broker a
> commission, you are not allowed to play the stock market game. On that
> same token you are not allowed to play the Roulette game, if you are
> unwilling to pay the house its commission, i.e. the house edge.
> http://casinosruns.blogspot.com/#
I can give a roulette system that is unconditionally guaranteed to
have a zero house percentage. There is no better system than it.
|
| | |
Date: 28 Nov 2006 16:23:05
From: Ewan Hoozarmi
Subject: Re: Winning Roulette System Revealed
|
In article <1164729863.118501.215160
@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >, rbmadden@ualr.edu says...
>
> I can give a roulette system that is unconditionally guaranteed to
> have a zero house percentage. There is no better system than it.
>
Did you nick it off Mike Caro?
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 21:12:39
From: Nick Wedd
Subject: Re: Winning Roulette System Revealed
|
In message <1164731709.068555.4540@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com >,
John_Brian_K <John_Brian_Kent_1677@Yahoo.Com > writes
>
>ukqytsirlhyw@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Let me explain this approach to you. In many ways, investing in the
>> stock market, the commodities markets, or buying and selling options is
>> very similar to playing the game of Roulette. Both have certain
>> probabilities to winning and losing.
>> In statistics, we consider the commodities market, as well as the game
>> of Roulette to be zero-sum games. That means the amount of money you
>> win is equal to the amount I lose. That way, the sum of all wins and
>> losses is zero. If you bet red and you win, the house loses the exact
>> amount equal to your wager. If you bet black and the Roulette decision
>> is red, you lose your wager. In the end, it is a zero-sum.
>> The field of statistics grew tremendously during and after World War
>> II. The United States and the United Kingdom were the dominant force in
>> advancing this field. After the war, most of the newfound principles
>> were applied to the business world. We find statistics in management,
>> stock market forecasting, economic planning, and even sociology.
>> Zero-sum means that whenever you win, the house loses -- there cannot
>> be two winners. Now you may asked, "But what about the house edge?
>> Doesn't the house always win in the long-run? How can you beat Roulette
>> consistently?"
>> Well, all good questions. In fact, these are the same questions my
>> partner and I asked ourselves as well. Whenever we compare playing
>> Roulette to investing in the stock market, we find that your brokerage
>> fees are like the house advantage. Without paying your broker a
>> commission, you are not allowed to play the stock market game. On that
>> same token you are not allowed to play the Roulette game, if you are
>> unwilling to pay the house its commission, i.e. the house edge.
>> http://casinosruns.blogspot.com/#
>
>
>Bet equal amounts on first third and second third or second third and
>third third or first third and third third and DONOT waver always stay
>with the same betting amounts and you will eventually win. Not very
>exciting, but...
>
>if its 15.00 minimum you have a 66% chance to win 15.00 and a 33%
>chance to lose 30.00
>
>OH SHIT wait this doesnt work!!! oops never mind @ least you will come
>out not losing.
>
>Sorry I am a moron.
But less of a moron than the OP.
--
Nick Wedd nick@maproom.co.uk
|
|
