| |
Main
Date: 09 Dec 2006 10:03:57
From: Will in New Haven
Subject: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a steal raise, except: If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad plays and suck out. Will in New Haven -- "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other players at this table for idiots."
|
|
| |
Date: 09 Dec 18:56:21
From: Tanya AKA MissT74
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the BB doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my cards suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, just fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I DON'T have a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack push it in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one that does that too. T On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > steal raise, except: > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > plays and suck out. > > Will in New Haven > > -- > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > players at this table for idiots." _______________________________________________________________ Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 15:08:22
From: akqjt98
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
It's no surprise that you would say that. You're the one that posted that you think a rag Ace vs. a bigger Ace or a pair is a coinflip, as long as you're the bigger stack. Although Fell is probably drooling at the suck out on him part, so maybe this post has some merit. On Dec 9 2006 12:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the BB > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my cards > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, just > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I DON'T have > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack push it > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one that does > that too. > > T > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > steal raise, except: > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > plays and suck out. > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > -- > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > players at this table for idiots." ________________________________________________________________________ : the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Dec 2006 11:27:39
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On Dec 9 2006 6:08 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > It's no surprise that you would say that. You're the one that posted that > you think a rag Ace vs. a bigger Ace or a pair is a coinflip, as long as > you're the bigger stack. Although Fell is probably drooling at the suck > out on him part, so maybe this post has some merit. > When did Tanya say that? > On Dec 9 2006 12:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > > > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the BB > > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my cards > > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, just > > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I DON'T > have > > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack push > it > > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one that > does > > that too. > > > > T > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > > steal raise, except: > > > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > > plays and suck out. > > > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > > > -- > > > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the > > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The > > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > > players at this table for idiots." thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 -------- RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 10 Dec 2006 12:24:59
From: akqjt98
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
Well, searching google groups, I found this post. It's #2: http://masl.to/?G40D5175E On Dec 10 2006 1:27 PM, pokerchimp wrote: > On Dec 9 2006 6:08 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > > > It's no surprise that you would say that. You're the one that posted that > > you think a rag Ace vs. a bigger Ace or a pair is a coinflip, as long as > > you're the bigger stack. Although Fell is probably drooling at the suck > > out on him part, so maybe this post has some merit. > > > > When did Tanya say that? > > > On Dec 9 2006 12:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > > > > > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the BB > > > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my > cards > > > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, > just > > > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I DON'T > > have > > > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack push > > it > > > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one that > > does > > > that too. > > > > > > T > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > > > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > > > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > > > steal raise, except: > > > > > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > > > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > > > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > > > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > > > plays and suck out. > > > > > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the > > > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The > > > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > > > players at this table for idiots." > > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 ______________________________________________________________________ looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 10 Dec 2006 13:47:17
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
Wow, she said it on my Birthday! On Dec 10 2006 3:24 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > Well, searching google groups, I found this post. It's #2: > http://masl.to/?G40D5175E > > > On Dec 10 2006 1:27 PM, pokerchimp wrote: > > > On Dec 9 2006 6:08 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > > > > > It's no surprise that you would say that. You're the one that posted that > > > you think a rag Ace vs. a bigger Ace or a pair is a coinflip, as long as > > > you're the bigger stack. Although Fell is probably drooling at the suck > > > out on him part, so maybe this post has some merit. > > > > > > > When did Tanya say that? > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 12:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > > > > > > > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the > BB > > > > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my > > cards > > > > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, > > just > > > > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I > DON'T > > > have > > > > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack > push > > > it > > > > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one > that > > > does > > > > that too. > > > > > > > > T > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > > > > > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > > > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > > > > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > > > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > > > > steal raise, except: > > > > > > > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > > > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > > > > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > > > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > > > > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > > > > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > > > > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > > > > plays and suck out. > > > > > > > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the > > > > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The > > > > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > > > > players at this table for idiots." > > > > > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 --- : the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 10 Dec 21:59:22
From: Tanya AKA MissT74
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On Dec 10 2006 2:47 PM, pokerchimp wrote: > Wow, she said it on my Birthday! Cool! But I didn't say what he thinks I said, he misquoted me. : ) T > > On Dec 10 2006 3:24 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > > > Well, searching google groups, I found this post. It's #2: > > http://masl.to/?G40D5175E > > > > > > On Dec 10 2006 1:27 PM, pokerchimp wrote: > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 6:08 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > > > > > > > It's no surprise that you would say that. You're the one that posted > that > > > > you think a rag Ace vs. a bigger Ace or a pair is a coinflip, as long as > > > > you're the bigger stack. Although Fell is probably drooling at the suck > > > > out on him part, so maybe this post has some merit. > > > > > > > > > > When did Tanya say that? > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 12:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and > > > > > the > > BB > > > > > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my > > > cards > > > > > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to > > > > > do, > > > just > > > > > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I > > DON'T > > > > have > > > > > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack > > push > > > > it > > > > > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one > > that > > > > does > > > > > that too. > > > > > > > > > > T > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > > > > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the > COS > > > > > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > > > > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > > > > > steal raise, except: > > > > > > > > > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > > > > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without > even > > > > > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > > > > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser > turns > > > > > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > > > > > > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of > tournament > > > > > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > > > > > plays and suck out. > > > > > > > > > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only > > > > > > the > > > > > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation > "The > > > > > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > > > > > players at this table for idiots." > > > > > > > > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 > > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 _______________________________________________________________ The Largest Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 10 Dec 2006 16:27:18
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
I know...I know u better than that, which is why I asked him to point to the thread where you elaborate. On Dec 10 2006 4:59 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > On Dec 10 2006 2:47 PM, pokerchimp wrote: > > > Wow, she said it on my Birthday! > > Cool! But I didn't say what he thinks I said, he misquoted me. : ) > > T > > > > > On Dec 10 2006 3:24 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > > > > > Well, searching google groups, I found this post. It's #2: > > > http://masl.to/?G40D5175E > > > > > > > > > On Dec 10 2006 1:27 PM, pokerchimp wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 6:08 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's no surprise that you would say that. You're the one that posted > > that > > > > > you think a rag Ace vs. a bigger Ace or a pair is a coinflip, as long as > > > > > you're the bigger stack. Although Fell is probably drooling at the suck > > > > > out on him part, so maybe this post has some merit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > When did Tanya say that? > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 12:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and > > > > > > the > > > BB > > > > > > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my > > > > cards > > > > > > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to > > > > > > do, > > > > just > > > > > > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I > > > DON'T > > > > > have > > > > > > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack > > > push > > > > > it > > > > > > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one > > > that > > > > > does > > > > > > that too. > > > > > > > > > > > > T > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > > > > > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the > > COS > > > > > > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > > > > > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > > > > > > steal raise, except: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > > > > > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without > > even > > > > > > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > > > > > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser > > turns > > > > > > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of > > tournament > > > > > > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > > > > > > plays and suck out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation > > "The > > > > > > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > > > > > > players at this table for idiots." > > > > > > > > > > > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 > > > > > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 -------- * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 10 Dec 21:33:43
From: Tanya AKA MissT74
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
If you read carefully, I stated that my having an A vs. the opponent having a pair is a coinflip, IMO. I never said my having an A-rag vs his A-Higher card was a coinflip, in that incidence I said I hope to suck out on him. The answer still holds true. If I have a huge chip stack, then I am going to use it to knock out the smaller stacks. My stack of 78,000 means I can do that to 2,000 chips stacks and if I double them up, so the fuck what...I still have 76,000 to their 4,000. I've been known to say "I'll either double you up or knock you out" if I have a huge chip stack, that is what I will do. Now get off my bra strap, boy, stop sweating me. T On Dec 10 2006 1:24 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > Well, searching google groups, I found this post. It's #2: > http://masl.to/?G40D5175E > > > On Dec 10 2006 1:27 PM, pokerchimp wrote: > > > On Dec 9 2006 6:08 PM, akqjt98 wrote: > > > > > It's no surprise that you would say that. You're the one that posted that > > > you think a rag Ace vs. a bigger Ace or a pair is a coinflip, as long as > > > you're the bigger stack. Although Fell is probably drooling at the suck > > > out on him part, so maybe this post has some merit. > > > > > > > When did Tanya say that? > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 12:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > > > > > > > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the > BB > > > > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my > > cards > > > > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, > > just > > > > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I > DON'T > > > have > > > > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack > push > > > it > > > > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one > that > > > does > > > > that too. > > > > > > > > T > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > > > > > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > > > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > > > > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > > > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > > > > steal raise, except: > > > > > > > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > > > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without > > > > > even > > > > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > > > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser > > > > > turns > > > > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > > > > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > > > > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > > > > plays and suck out. > > > > > > > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the > > > > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The > > > > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > > > > players at this table for idiots." > > > > > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7 _______________________________________________________________ Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 13:48:47
From: johnny T
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the BB > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my cards > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, just > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I DON'T have > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack push it > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one that does > that too. > > T It is known as a courtesy double-up, and the pros are pretty negative about it. While you are right, he may fold, you may win, the likely out-come is that you will make it harder for you others to put him out, or more importantly, you are going to shift chips from you to an opponent you would rather not have them via the small stack. They are not likely to be evenly distributed, but distributed in whole to an opponent who may now take you out. The truth is, yes you can let them have the blinds. It changes their position very very little, and changes it much less than doubling them up would. I understand the desire to put people out, but some people will be put out by the power of time, and they will have less of it if you don't give them extra-chips.
|
| | |
Date: 09 Dec 21:48:03
From: Nick Wool
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On Dec 9 2006 6:56 PM, Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the BB > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my cards > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, just > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I DON'T > have > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack push it > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one that > does > that too. > > T > If the BB had a mid stack, I would agree with your bigstack bullying play. But if the BB was committed, why take a chance to double him up with trash? Let the button, if he had a hand, or the SB, who should really be pushing with any 2 when folded to him here, try to take out the BB. By raising as the bigstack with a trash hand at cutoff, you are pushing out the button who might have a marginal hand and in a better position to take out the BB, and the SB who would probably fold with a strongish hand, whilst leaving the BB who is committed to call. Surely bad equity for you to double the BB up? One more player in the reckoning and all that? _______________________________________________________________ * New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 13:23:54
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On 9 Dec 2006 10:03:57 -0800, "Will in New Haven" <bill.reich@taylorandfrancis.com > wrote: >On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most >coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS >or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit >disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a >steal raise, except: >If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that >the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even >looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise >and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns >out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. >Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament >where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad >plays and suck out. I do this sometimes and then wince at my stupidity. I wonder, though, was this a situation where there might have been an advantage to taking a shot at knocking out a short stack even as a dog? If not, it was just a pure fuckup. How'd the hand actually go and who played it?
|
| |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 23:11:29
From: FellKnight
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > steal raise, except: > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > plays and suck out. > > Will in New Haven Yes and no. There is something to be said for playing a pot and getting good odds on your money to knock a guy out, not to mention the image effects of being seen to raise with trash. Back when I played a fairly tight game, if I had some chips (i.e. the pot wonnt bust me), and I am in LP with trash, and the BB is committed, I would raise with my trash, knowing I would get called. Either I'd suck out and bust someone, or not, but either way, my raises would get much more play later on. Gigabet has a similar move (where there is a short allin and a caller, and he'll reraise with trash such as Q3o to get the pot headsup). Fell -- Website: www.fellknight.com Email: fellknight at gmail dot com ________________________________________________________________________ * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 10 Dec 11:58:14
From: Nick Wool
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
> > Gigabet has a similar move (where there is a short allin and a caller, and > he'll reraise with trash such as Q3o to get the pot headsup). > > Fell > > -- > Website: http://www.fellknight.com/ > Email: fellknight at gmail dot com Which reminds me of one of my favourite moves...if I am in EP with a big pair, and I see that there's a shorties behind me, or even better, in the blinds, I'd nearly always limp, knowing someone will raise trying to get heads-up with the shortie. Even if no one raises, the shortie will nearly always raise to reopen the betting if he is short enough (<3BBs to 5BBs). _______________________________________________________________ Watch Lists, Block Lists, Favorites - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Dec 2006 11:13:46
From: FellKnight
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On Dec 10 2006 4:58 AM, Nick Wool wrote: > > > > Gigabet has a similar move (where there is a short allin and a caller, and > > he'll reraise with trash such as Q3o to get the pot headsup). > > > > Fell > > > > -- > > Website: http://www.fellknight.com/ > > Email: fellknight at gmail dot com > > Which reminds me of one of my favourite moves...if I am in EP with a big pair, > and I see that there's a shorties behind me, or even better, in the blinds, I'd > nearly always limp, knowing someone will raise trying to get heads-up with the > shortie. Even if no one raises, the shortie will nearly always raise to reopen > the betting if he is short enough (<3BBs to 5BBs). Yes, that is a good move (though I have noticed a lot of dumb shorties who will check their BB with 2xBB left behind and 5 callers, and check/fold the flop if they miss). Tournaments are all about looking for opportunities to make the best play, and the best play often involves thinking outside the box. Fell -- Website: www.fellknight.com Email: fellknight at gmail dot com _____________________________________________________________________ * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 22:44:48
From: xyious
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
On Dec 9 2006 7:03 PM, Will in New Haven wrote: > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > steal raise, except: > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. have to disagree here for the general case. you're making the point that the BB didn't have enough chips to fold. now while i agree that here a raise in the cutoff is a bad play with rags, and even then, if he didn't raise much more than the BB had, why would he push out button/sb ? in the SB, however, you may have a higher EV putting the BB all in, than folding your SB would be. even if you expect to be dominated. 100-200, BB has 300. so you essentially have to put in 200 more for a 400 pot. that's 2-1, so pushing any 2 would be correct here, unless you have a 'read' on a player that hasn't acted yet. BB with 600 left would give you 700-400, still barely worse than 2-1, and he actually might fold, so again i'm pushing any 2 here. -Alexander Knopf http://www.xyious.com/?links ------- looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 13:26:30
From: Will in New Haven
Subject: Re: Raise when the BB can't afford to fold
|
Tanya AKA MissT74 wrote: > I'm going to have to disagree with you here. If I have a stack, and the BB > doesn't, then I'm raising with ATC to put him all in, and then hope my cards > suck out on him. Sure, I double him up, but what else am I going to do, just > fold and let him have the blinds? Not if I have the chips. Now, if I DON'T have > a stack, then I can fold, but with a stack, I'm making the small stack push it > in. You never know too, some have folded to the felt, he could be one that does > that too. > > T Even if you are on the button (and he might have been in the CoS) you are risking the possibility that the SB might have a hand when you have no fold equity on the BB. If you were in the SB and only had to worry about the BB, your idea would make more sense. I don't think I would rely on anyone on the PPT, even though some of them aren't that good, not realizing that he has only 2.5BB left if he folds. And only 2BB left if he does that and then posts the SB and folds. Also, it is early enough in the event that there is not enugh value in eliminating somone to justify risking losing chips. If I know someone has to call, I am quite happy to raise with any above-average hand but I won't just double people up gratuitously. Will in New Haven -- "I have seen the David, seen the Mona Lisa too And I have heard Doc Watson play Columbus Stockade Blues" Guy Clark - "Dublin Blues > > > On Dec 9 2006 11:03 AM, Will in New Haven wrote: > > > On the vaunted Pro Poker Tour, which we are told awards "the most > > coveterd title in poker," the chip leader is sitting either in the COS > > or on the button and makes a steal-raise with small offsuit > > disconnectors of some sort. Now there's nothing to criticize about a > > steal raise, except: > > > > If he had been paying any attention at ALL, he would have known that > > the BB has so few chips left that he has to go to the matt without even > > looking at his cards. The raiser is priced into calling the re-raise > > and then BB turns over a couple of crap cards also and the raiser turns > > out to be DOMINATED. Great play, guy. > > > > Chip leader sucks out too. It's so nice to see this type of tournament > > where only the pros play and we don't get to see amateurs make bad > > plays and suck out. > > > > Will in New Haven > > > > -- > > > > "That's the ninth time we have seen a player move all-in and only the > > second time it hasn't been called." Announcer on PPT, translation "The > > players on this table are either idiots or are playing the other > > players at this table for idiots." > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
|