| |
Main
Date: 07 Dec 21:46:17
From: Vegas Vic
Subject: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
How quickly we forget.
God bless America (for those who still care).
_______________________________________________________________
Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
|
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 17:52:08
From: OrangeSFO
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
SOMEBODY forgot. Somebody who's JOB it is to remember...
President's Daily Brief
August 6, 2001
"Bin Laden determined to strike in US"
|
| | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 20:57:12
From: OrangeSFO
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
Vegas Vic wrote:
> I'm sure OrangeSFO is flying his North Korean flag proudly today.
Meaningless non-sequitur.
|
| | |
Date: 08 Dec
From: Vegas Vic
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
I'm sure OrangeSFO is flying his North Korean flag proudly today.
On Dec 7 2006 5:52 PM, OrangeSFO wrote:
> SOMEBODY forgot. Somebody who's JOB it is to remember...
>
>
> President's Daily Brief
> August 6, 2001
>
>
> "Bin Laden determined to strike in US"
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 06:57:07
From: mo_charles
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
> SOMEBODY forgot. Somebody who's JOB it is to remember...
>
> President's Daily Brief
> August 6, 2001
>
> "Bin Laden determined to strike in US"
what was george bush supposed to do in response to this particular memo,
orange? level the sacred wall between intelligence agencies erected by
liberal democrats in the name of "privacy"? stomp on the rights of
foreign nationals living peacefully in the united states? spy on muslims?
come on, orange, which of the things you shit yourself over today would
you have been happy with before 9/11?
mo_charles
-------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 19:24:38
From: MZB
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
I still care. At that time, we had INTEGRITY as a country.
If Bush had been President, we probably would have attacked Equador
Mel
"Vegas Vic" <43081959@recpoker.com > wrote in message
news:1165527977$918037@recpoker.com...
> How quickly we forget.
>
> God bless America (for those who still care).
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 19:58:23
From: Omaha Chris
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
MZB wrote:
> I still care. At that time, we had INTEGRITY as a country.
For allowing/encouraging the attack?
The leadership of this country had no more integrity on December 7th '41
than it did on September 11th '01, when it allowed/encouraged that one too.
|
| | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 03:36:24
From: Von Fourche
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net > wrote in message
news:bh2eh.41$di4.3@newsfe04.lga...
>I still care. At that time, we had INTEGRITY as a country.
>
> If Bush had been President, we probably would have attacked Equador
>
> Mel
Some say that Truman dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan out of revenge
for Pearle Harbor. If that is so, or even remotely so, then 9/11 gave the
U.S. the right to nuke the Sand People strait to hell and turn their
countries to glass. Ok, I am a Democrat and I do consider myself liberal on
many issues. But I was disgusted when I heard a radio talk show host tell
his audience that the last thing we need to do is drop nuclear bombs on our
enemies. Yes, I know we can't go around nuking everybody. But if anything
gave the U.S. the right to slaughter the bad guys, it was 9/11. And when I
say Sand People and bad guys, I am specifically talking about Saudi Arabia.
After 9/11 the first thing we should have done is pull all troops out of
Saudi Arabia. Next, drop the nukes on those people. But what does Bush do?
He holds hands with their king or whatever. Disgusting.
|
| | | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 21:52:29
From: KilgoreTrout
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 7 2006 10:36 PM, Von Fourche wrote:
> "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> news:bh2eh.41$di4.3@newsfe04.lga...
> >I still care. At that time, we had INTEGRITY as a country.
> >
> > If Bush had been President, we probably would have attacked Equador
> >
> > Mel
>
>
>
> Some say that Truman dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan out of revenge
> for Pearle Harbor. If that is so, or even remotely so, then 9/11 gave the
> U.S. the right to nuke the Sand People strait to hell and turn their
> countries to glass.
Dude, do you have any idea what drilling a well through glass does to an
oil company's overhead?
Not to mention buying second-hand rad-suits for every Tom and Dick
engineer.
_____________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 21:04:57
From: Chris H. of Portland, OR
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"Von Fourche" <Khonakong@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:Y45eh.7939$tM1.7601@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Some say that Truman dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan out of revenge
> for Pearle Harbor. If that is so, or even remotely so, then 9/11 gave the
> U.S. the right to nuke the Sand People strait to hell and turn their
> countries to glass. Ok, I am a Democrat and I do consider myself liberal
> on many issues. But I was disgusted when I heard a radio talk show host
> tell his audience that the last thing we need to do is drop nuclear bombs
> on our enemies. Yes, I know we can't go around nuking everybody. But if
> anything gave the U.S. the right to slaughter the bad guys, it was 9/11.
> And when I say Sand People and bad guys, I am specifically talking about
> Saudi Arabia. After 9/11 the first thing we should have done is pull all
> troops out of Saudi Arabia. Next, drop the nukes on those people. But
> what does Bush do? He holds hands with their king or whatever.
> Disgusting.
Wow, I'm glad YOU aren't in charge of anything.
Also, please define "bad guys".
--
Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
Konichiwa, Bitches!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
|
| | | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 23:54:54
From: sng
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
Von Fourche wrote:
>
>
> Some say that Truman dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan out of revenge
> for Pearle Harbor. If that is so, or even remotely so, then 9/11 gave the
> U.S. the right to nuke the Sand People strait to hell and turn their
> countries to glass. Ok, I am a Democrat and I do consider myself liberal on
> many issues. But I was disgusted when I heard a radio talk show host tell
> his audience that the last thing we need to do is drop nuclear bombs on our
> enemies. Yes, I know we can't go around nuking everybody. But if anything
> gave the U.S. the right to slaughter the bad guys, it was 9/11. And when I
> say Sand People and bad guys, I am specifically talking about Saudi Arabia.
> After 9/11 the first thing we should have done is pull all troops out of
> Saudi Arabia. Next, drop the nukes on those people. But what does Bush do?
> He holds hands with their king or whatever. Disgusting.
>
So lets kill millions of innocent Saudis so we can get a handful of bad
guys.
Your thought process is no different than terrorists.
--
S. Doyle
doyles AT mountaincable DOT net
|
| | | |
Date: 09 Dec
From: Bryan Kimmes
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 7 2006 9:36 PM, Von Fourche wrote:
> "MZB" wrote in message
> news:bh2eh.41$di4.3@newsfe04.lga...
> >I still care. At that time, we had INTEGRITY as a country.
> >
> > If Bush had been President, we probably would have attacked Equador
> >
> > Mel
>
>
>
> Some say that Truman dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan out of revenge
> for Pearle Harbor. If that is so, or even remotely so, then 9/11 gave the
> U.S. the right to nuke the Sand People strait to hell and turn their
> countries to glass. Ok, I am a Democrat and I do consider myself liberal on
> many issues. But I was disgusted when I heard a radio talk show host tell
> his audience that the last thing we need to do is drop nuclear bombs on our
> enemies. Yes, I know we can't go around nuking everybody. But if anything
> gave the U.S. the right to slaughter the bad guys, it was 9/11. And when I
> say Sand People and bad guys, I am specifically talking about Saudi Arabia.
> After 9/11 the first thing we should have done is pull all troops out of
> Saudi Arabia. Next, drop the nukes on those people. But what does Bush do?
> He holds hands with their king or whatever. Disgusting.
Troll or Lunatic?
Bryan
_______________________________________________________________
New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 01:58:45
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
Even on the anniversary of Pearl Harbor some people are just incapable of a
simple "Amen", "Thank you" or tribute to the Americans who died in the
attack.
Irish Mike
"MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net > wrote in message
news:bh2eh.41$di4.3@newsfe04.lga...
>I still care. At that time, we had INTEGRITY as a country.
>
> If Bush had been President, we probably would have attacked Equador
>
> Mel
>
>
> "Vegas Vic" <43081959@recpoker.com> wrote in message
> news:1165527977$918037@recpoker.com...
>> How quickly we forget.
>>
>> God bless America (for those who still care).
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________
>> Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
>
>
|
| | | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 21:02:30
From: Chris H. of Portland, OR
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:pF3eh.20210$9v5.12412@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> Even on the anniversary of Pearl Harbor some people are just incapable of
> a simple "Amen", "Thank you" or tribute to the Americans who died in the
> attack.
Apples and Oranges.
Pearl Harbor was a military against military combat engagement, albet "sneak
attack", but still in the context of a war. America's response was swift and
universal: get the bastards responsible. And we did.
9/11 was a civilian attack against civilians in a civilian setting. A
non-governmental organization of criminals masterminded it, using a religion
as their excuse/scapegoat. America's response was to pay lip service to
"getting the bastards responsible" while using the event to attack a
completely non-involved country to grab resource rights/settle an old family
beef.
Yes, they are obviously the same thing *rolling eyes*
--
Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
Konichiwa, Bitches!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
|
| | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 05:55:03
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"9/11 was a civilian attack "
9/11 was not an attack by "civilians". It was an attack by terrorists.
This may come as a shock to you but not all enemy combatants wear uniforms.
Irish Mike
"Chris H. of Portland, OR" <chrispdx@comcast.FUCKOFFSPAMMERS.net > wrote in
message news:m62dnWLocLUfbOXYnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:pF3eh.20210$9v5.12412@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>> Even on the anniversary of Pearl Harbor some people are just incapable of
>> a simple "Amen", "Thank you" or tribute to the Americans who died in the
>> attack.
>
> Apples and Oranges.
>
> Pearl Harbor was a military against military combat engagement, albet
> "sneak attack", but still in the context of a war. America's response was
> swift and universal: get the bastards responsible. And we did.
>
> 9/11 was a civilian attack against civilians in a civilian setting. A
> non-governmental organization of criminals masterminded it, using a
> religion as their excuse/scapegoat. America's response was to pay lip
> service to "getting the bastards responsible" while using the event to
> attack a completely non-involved country to grab resource rights/settle an
> old family beef.
>
> Yes, they are obviously the same thing *rolling eyes*
>
> --
> Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
> Konichiwa, Bitches!
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
>
>
>
|
| | | | | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 22:13:09
From: Chris H. of Portland, OR
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:X67eh.11631$Py2.8178@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> "9/11 was a civilian attack "
>
> 9/11 was not an attack by "civilians". It was an attack by terrorists.
> This may come as a shock to you but not all enemy combatants wear
> uniforms.
Semantics. Al-Qaeda is not affiliated with (financially sponsored by,
perhaps, and by some countries we classify as "friends") any country or
government. Fighting this kind of "war" isn't the gung-ho tanks-and-infantry
battles that your grandparents knew. It's secret ops, infiltrating
organizations and killing them one-by-one or bringing them to trial in a
court of law, whichever you choose. It isnt by "nuking entire countries" or
"forcebly imposing democracy on people who should be welcoming it but
aren't". But if it makes your flag-waving more meaningful to you, go ahead
and picture the "glorious struggle for freedom against them raghead
terrorists" as a Norman Rockwell painting of valiant American soldiers
battling evil Middle Easterners. Your xenophobic racist nature probably
wouldn't accept anything else.
--
Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
Konichiwa, Bitches!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 07:42:26
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So please
spare me your silly, naive lecture.
Irish Mike
"Chris H. of Portland, OR" <chrispdx@comcast.FUCKOFFSPAMMERS.net > wrote in
message news:GqWdnX5Kn4qdn-TYnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:X67eh.11631$Py2.8178@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> "9/11 was a civilian attack "
>>
>> 9/11 was not an attack by "civilians". It was an attack by terrorists.
>> This may come as a shock to you but not all enemy combatants wear
>> uniforms.
>
> Semantics. Al-Qaeda is not affiliated with (financially sponsored by,
> perhaps, and by some countries we classify as "friends") any country or
> government. Fighting this kind of "war" isn't the gung-ho
> tanks-and-infantry battles that your grandparents knew. It's secret ops,
> infiltrating organizations and killing them one-by-one or bringing them to
> trial in a court of law, whichever you choose. It isnt by "nuking entire
> countries" or "forcebly imposing democracy on people who should be
> welcoming it but aren't". But if it makes your flag-waving more meaningful
> to you, go ahead and picture the "glorious struggle for freedom against
> them raghead terrorists" as a Norman Rockwell painting of valiant American
> soldiers battling evil Middle Easterners. Your xenophobic racist nature
> probably wouldn't accept anything else.
>
> --
> Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
> Konichiwa, Bitches!
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
>
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 06:15:21
From: Chris H. of Portland, OR
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
>I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So please
>spare me your silly, naive lecture.
I can make up stories, too.
--
Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
Konichiwa, Bitches!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 17:45:55
From: Gary Carson
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8 2006 8:13 AM, Chris H. of Portland, OR wrote:
> "Irish Mike" wrote in message
> news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
> >I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So please
> >spare me your silly, naive lecture.
>
> I can make up stories, too.
>
He was a sargeant. He has no experince at all with the strategic use of special
ops. He has experience shooting at people. He was probably pretty good at
that. Or maybe he wasn't a sgt, maybe that was Jamison and Irish Boy was a
spec 4.
Or maybe he was a supply sgt. in a special ops unit and knows all about exactly
what supplies special ops requires.
Or maybe he was in a Pheonix unit and has experience in transporting hit men to
kill designated civilians.
This "I did everything" crap sounds like an old Ricky Nelson song.
Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com
_______________________________________________________________
* New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 14:46:29
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"I can make up stories, too."
I have no doubt that you make up stories. The difference is those of us who
actually served, don't.
Irish Mike
"Chris H. of Portland, OR" <chrispdx@comcast.FUCKOFFSPAMMERS.net > wrote in
message news:U66dncmxG-uY7uTYnZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
>>I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So
>>please spare me your silly, naive lecture.
>
> I can make up stories, too.
>
> --
> Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
> Konichiwa, Bitches!
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 19:33:49
From: Gary Carson
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8 2006 8:46 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
> "I can make up stories, too."
>
> I have no doubt that you make up stories. The difference is those of us who
> actually served, don't.
What Army did you serve in? The Navy I served in had lots of guys who were full
of shit.
Do you really think Westmoreland's Body Counts wasn't just an invitation for the
entire Army to just make shit up.
See http://www.mathandpoker.com/index.php/?p=95 for a story about people making
up numbers.
>
> Irish Mike
>
>
> "Chris H. of Portland, OR" wrote in
> message news:U66dncmxG-uY7uTYnZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@comcast.com...
> > "Irish Mike" wrote in message
> > news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
> >>I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So
> >>please spare me your silly, naive lecture.
> >
> > I can make up stories, too.
> >
> > --
> > Chris H. of Portland, Oregon
> > Konichiwa, Bitches!
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUuIzw8X46Q
> >
Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com
_______________________________________________________________
The Largest Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 11:46:40
From: WuzYoungOnceToo
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8, 11:45 am, Gary Carson <garycar...@alumni.northwestern.edu >
wrote:
>
> This "I did everything" crap sounds like an old Ricky Nelson song.
Oddly like your "I know everything" crap.
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec
From: Gary Carson
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8 2006 1:42 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
> I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So please
> spare me your silly, naive lecture.
It involves looking in Iraq for people who've never been in Iraq?
No wonder we lost in Vietnam.
Aren't you the idiot who a few days ago claimed that 4 years without losing a
battle means we aren't losing the war? What it really means is that the army is
run by a bunch of career cowards who are scared to death to put themselves in a
situation where they might not win. They'll fight the winnable battles but
won't fight battles that matter.
It that what special ops is to you? Special ops is just a military version of
special ed.
Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 07:47:48
From: Von Fourche
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
>I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So please
>spare me your silly, naive lecture.
>
CIA? NSA? Seal? Green Beret? Ranger? Something else? Please tell.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 12:13:01
From: Kenneth Sloan
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
Von Fourche wrote:
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
>> I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So please
>> spare me your silly, naive lecture.
>>
>
>
> CIA? NSA? Seal? Green Beret? Ranger? Something else? Please tell.
>
>
He *could* tell you....but then he'd have to kill you.
--
Kenneth Sloan KennethRSloan@gmail.com
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://www.cis.uab.edu/sloan/
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 11:28:03
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
Two of those on your list and one you didn't list.
Irish Mike
"Von Fourche" <Khonakong@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:EM8eh.8293$ql2.757@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
>>I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So
>>please spare me your silly, naive lecture.
>>
>
>
> CIA? NSA? Seal? Green Beret? Ranger? Something else? Please tell.
>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Dec 23:32:49
From: TheFleece
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8 2006 9:28 PM, Irish Mike wrote:
> Two of those on your list and one you didn't list.
>
> Irish Mike
>
> "Von Fourche" wrote in message
> news:EM8eh.8293$ql2.757@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >
> > "Irish Mike" wrote in message
> > news:CH8eh.3135$Ga1.825@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
> >>I have experience with exactly what special operations involves. So
> >>please spare me your silly, naive lecture.
> >>
> >
> >
> > CIA? NSA? Seal? Green Beret? Ranger? Something else? Please tell.
> >
Yeah so do I, except I got 3 (and 2 that you didn't mention).
_______________________________________________________________
* New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 02:12:49
From: Von Fourche
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:pF3eh.20210$9v5.12412@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> Even on the anniversary of Pearl Harbor some people are just incapable of
> a simple "Amen", "Thank you" or tribute to the Americans who died in the
> attack.
I think we should offer any soldier who has fought in a war free tuition
to his local college. Plus, if the soldier has any kids we should pay the
tuition for one of his children to attend college. The longer the war, the
more of his kids get free tuition to college. Therefore: one year war -
the soldier gets to go to college for free and one of his children gets to
go to college for free (when old enough of course.) Two year war - the
solider get to go to college for free and two of his kids get to go to
college for free. Three year war - three of his kids. etc...
You want to honor the soldiers? Then honor him and his children.
|
| | | | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 19:52:22
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
The government treats their veterans like shit. My father, who is a vet
and also a pharmacist, decided not to take advantage of the VA for
medication for the last 45 years because he was able to get it for free
because he owned his own pharmacy. NOw he is retired, so he went to the
VA, where he is supposed to get medications for a small co-payment.
Whoops, they don't give that any more. The VA just stopped giving that
benefit to new applicants....two weeks before my father applied. Another
example of how our government appreciates it's soldiers.
On Dec 8 2006 9:12 PM, Von Fourche wrote:
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:pF3eh.20210$9v5.12412@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > Even on the anniversary of Pearl Harbor some people are just incapable of
> > a simple "Amen", "Thank you" or tribute to the Americans who died in the
> > attack.
>
>
> I think we should offer any soldier who has fought in a war free tuition
> to his local college. Plus, if the soldier has any kids we should pay the
> tuition for one of his children to attend college. The longer the war, the
> more of his kids get free tuition to college. Therefore: one year war -
> the soldier gets to go to college for free and one of his children gets to
> go to college for free (when old enough of course.) Two year war - the
> solider get to go to college for free and two of his kids get to go to
> college for free. Three year war - three of his kids. etc...
>
> You want to honor the soldiers? Then honor him and his children.
thumbers on stars, pokerchimp1 on absolute
--------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 23:01:34
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 19:52:22 -0800, "pokerchimp" <mixthing@se.rr.com > wrote:
>The government treats their veterans like shit. My father, who is a vet
>and also a pharmacist, decided not to take advantage of the VA for
>medication for the last 45 years because he was able to get it for free
>because he owned his own pharmacy. NOw he is retired, so he went to the
>VA, where he is supposed to get medications for a small co-payment.
>Whoops, they don't give that any more. The VA just stopped giving that
>benefit to new applicants....two weeks before my father applied. Another
>example of how our government appreciates it's soldiers.
You should realize Republican "support" for the troops consists of putting
little fucking magnetic stickers on their car saying "Support the Troops."
Magnetic, of course, so they don't even risk their paint job. That's
self-sacrifice for you. Then they go vote for people who slash the
VA budget and vet's medical benefits while sending them to die in
foolish, unnecessary wars based on lies. With friends like that. . .
|
| | | | | |
Date: 10 Dec
From: arlo payne
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 9 2006 8:52 PM, pokerchimp wrote:
> The government treats their veterans like shit. My father, who is a vet
> and also a pharmacist, decided not to take advantage of the VA for
> medication for the last 45 years because he was able to get it for free
> because he owned his own pharmacy. NOw he is retired, so he went to the
> VA, where he is supposed to get medications for a small co-payment.
> Whoops, they don't give that any more. The VA just stopped giving that
> benefit to new applicants....two weeks before my father applied. Another
> example of how our government appreciates it's soldiers.
>
> On Dec 8 2006 9:12 PM, Von Fourche wrote:
>
> > "Irish Mike" wrote in message
> > news:pF3eh.20210$9v5.12412@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > > Even on the anniversary of Pearl Harbor some people are just incapable of
> > > a simple "Amen", "Thank you" or tribute to the Americans who died in the
> > > attack.
> >
> >
> > I think we should offer any soldier who has fought in a war free tuition
> > to his local college. Plus, if the soldier has any kids we should pay the
> > tuition for one of his children to attend college. The longer the war, the
> > more of his kids get free tuition to college. Therefore: one year war -
> > the soldier gets to go to college for free and one of his children gets to
> > go to college for free (when old enough of course.) Two year war - the
> > solider get to go to college for free and two of his kids get to go to
> > college for free. Three year war - three of his kids. etc...
> >
> > You want to honor the soldiers? Then honor him and his children.
>
>
He can have some of mine I share :)
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 14:15:22
From: elf
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 7 2006 2:46 PM, Vegas Vic wrote:
> How quickly we forget.
My wife will never forget. Dec. 7th is her birthday. She celebrates by
going out and getting bombed.
---
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 20:33:56
From: kuhnfucius
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
Here about the man who is half Jewish and half Japanese? Every Dec. 7 he
attacks Pearl Swartz.
An old one, but there are always some who have not heard it (or wish not
to).
"elf" <a1651@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:qcgm44xmr6.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Dec 7 2006 2:46 PM, Vegas Vic wrote:
>
>> How quickly we forget.
>
> My wife will never forget. Dec. 7th is her birthday. She celebrates by
> going out and getting bombed.
>
> ---
> RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
>
>
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 14:58:15
From: OrangeSFO
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
mo_charles wrote:
> what was george bush supposed to do in response to this particular memo,
> orange?
I don't know. But I would suggest starting with something beyond:
"Not one damn thing."
|
| | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 12:25:17
From: mo_charles
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
> > what was george bush supposed to do in response to this particular memo,
> > orange?
>
> I don't know. But I would suggest starting with something beyond:
> "Not one damn thing."
everything george bush does is wrong, even when he doesn't do anything.
LOL! we definitely need more honest insight from the emotionally bent
left if we're ever going to make any progress.
mo_charles
------
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 14:11:07
From: OrangeSFO
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
mo_charles wrote:
> what was george bush supposed to do in response to this particular memo,
> orange?
I don't know. But I would suggest starting with something beyond:
"Not one damn thing."
|
| | |
Date: 08 Dec 22:30:18
From: Gary Carson
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8 2006 4:11 PM, OrangeSFO wrote:
> mo_charles wrote:
>
> > what was george bush supposed to do in response to this particular memo,
> > orange?
>
>
>
> I don't know. But I would suggest starting with something beyond:
> "Not one damn thing."
He should consult with God. Then decide whether it's a good day to clear brush
or play golf.
But is the God of Bush the same God as the God of Catholics. They have a God
who supports terrorists (IRA) and protects pediphiles (priests).
A couple of the other two Gods of Abraham think pediphiles are bad but terrorism
is good. So how does Bush figure he should attack one of them, but not the
other, and not the Catholic God.
American had a suicide bomber attack in Ohio last month (or was it October) But
it doesn't count because he made his suicide bomb attack in the name of the
nutcase Christian God.
It just gets so confusing.
Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 12:33:42
From: mo_charles
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
> > > what was george bush supposed to do in response to this particular memo,
> > > orange?
> >
> > I don't know. But I would suggest starting with something beyond:
> > "Not one damn thing."
>
> He should consult with God. Then decide whether it's a good day to clear
brush
> or play golf.
>
> But is the God of Bush the same God as the God of Catholics. They have a God
> who supports terrorists (IRA) and protects pediphiles (priests).
>
> A couple of the other two Gods of Abraham think pediphiles are bad but
terrorism
> is good. So how does Bush figure he should attack one of them, but not the
> other, and not the Catholic God.
>
> American had a suicide bomber attack in Ohio last month (or was it October)
But
> it doesn't count because he made his suicide bomb attack in the name of the
> nutcase Christian God.
>
> It just gets so confusing.
when you know everything there is to know, then you don't really need
another G_d, do you gary? long live evolution, and don't forget to save
the fucking whales!
mo_charles
-----
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 09 Dec 20:47:45
From: Gary Carson
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 9 2006 2:33 PM, mo_charles wrote:
> >
> > American had a suicide bomber attack in Ohio last month (or was it October)
> But
> > it doesn't count because he made his suicide bomb attack in the name of the
> > nutcase Christian God.
> >
> > It just gets so confusing.
>
> when you know everything there is to know, then you don't really need
> another G_d, do you gary? long live evolution, and don't forget to save
> the fucking whales!
I'll never figure it out.
The Christian terroist wasn't covered anybody but Countdown as far as I know.
The more recent terroist arrest is muslim and it's all ove the news.
Of course he's an idiot that didn't do anything and wasn't likely to do
anything. He thinks he can blow up a mall with a couple of hand grenades and he
has no clue how to get a hand grenade anyway.
But he's muslim. So he's bad. The Christian terroist who actually killed
people wasn't really evil, he was just confused.
I'll never figure it out.
Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 16:20:22
From: mo_charles
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
> > > It just gets so confusing.
> >
> > when you know everything there is to know, then you don't really need
> > another G_d, do you gary? long live evolution, and don't forget to save
> > the fucking whales!
>
> I'll never figure it out.
>
> The Christian terroist wasn't covered anybody but Countdown as far as I know.
>
> The more recent terroist arrest is muslim and it's all ove the news.
>
> Of course he's an idiot that didn't do anything and wasn't likely to do
> anything. He thinks he can blow up a mall with a couple of hand grenades
and he
> has no clue how to get a hand grenade anyway.
>
> But he's muslim. So he's bad. The Christian terroist who actually killed
> people wasn't really evil, he was just confused.
>
> I'll never figure it out.
gary, take us to the second level:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0612090096dec09,1,3166360.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed
"
Crowds of confused commuters built quickly as security guards turned them
away from Ogilvie, where roughly 50,000 commuters typically depart on a
weeknight.
Public address announcements were muffled. Commuters literally bumped into
one another, trying to make sense of unintelligible chatter.
Hours later, Chicago police would explain that a man had shot and killed
three men in a law office and was holding another person hostage before a
sniper from a police SWAT team killed him.
"
if you read the article carefully, you'll find no mention of this
murderous man's religious taste (a gutless cover-up, i'll wager). he's
done some bad shit, so we know he's religious. but, we're still trying
to figure out which religion to blame. any thoughts? i guess if all else
fails, we could use old standby and blame the jews.
mo_charles
____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 10 Dec
From: Gary Carson
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
Probably a jew raised by same sex parents and that ultra liberal Chicago Tribune
wants to cover it up.
On Dec 9 2006 6:20 PM, mo_charles wrote:
> > > > It just gets so confusing.
> > >
> > > when you know everything there is to know, then you don't really need
> > > another G_d, do you gary? long live evolution, and don't forget to save
> > > the fucking whales!
> >
> > I'll never figure it out.
> >
> > The Christian terroist wasn't covered anybody but Countdown as far as I
> > know.
> >
> > The more recent terroist arrest is muslim and it's all ove the news.
> >
> > Of course he's an idiot that didn't do anything and wasn't likely to do
> > anything. He thinks he can blow up a mall with a couple of hand grenades
> and he
> > has no clue how to get a hand grenade anyway.
> >
> > But he's muslim. So he's bad. The Christian terroist who actually killed
> > people wasn't really evil, he was just confused.
> >
> > I'll never figure it out.
>
> gary, take us to the second level:
>
>
> http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0612090096dec09,1,3166360.
> story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed
>
> "
> Crowds of confused commuters built quickly as security guards turned them
> away from Ogilvie, where roughly 50,000 commuters typically depart on a
> weeknight.
>
> Public address announcements were muffled. Commuters literally bumped into
> one another, trying to make sense of unintelligible chatter.
>
> Hours later, Chicago police would explain that a man had shot and killed
> three men in a law office and was holding another person hostage before a
> sniper from a police SWAT team killed him.
> "
>
> if you read the article carefully, you'll find no mention of this
> murderous man's religious taste (a gutless cover-up, i'll wager). he's
> done some bad shit, so we know he's religious. but, we're still trying
> to figure out which religion to blame. any thoughts? i guess if all else
> fails, we could use old standby and blame the jews.
>
> mo_charles
Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com
_______________________________________________________________
Watch Lists, Block Lists, Favorites - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 09 Dec 2006 20:21:08
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
lol, you're so imaginative
On Dec 9 2006 8:09 PM, Gary Carson wrote:
> Probably a jew raised by same sex parents and that ultra liberal Chicago
Tribune
> wants to cover it up.
>
>
> On Dec 9 2006 6:20 PM, mo_charles wrote:
>
> > > > > It just gets so confusing.
> > > >
> > > > when you know everything there is to know, then you don't really need
> > > > another G_d, do you gary? long live evolution, and don't forget to save
> > > > the fucking whales!
> > >
> > > I'll never figure it out.
> > >
> > > The Christian terroist wasn't covered anybody but Countdown as far as I
> > > know.
> > >
> > > The more recent terroist arrest is muslim and it's all ove the news.
> > >
> > > Of course he's an idiot that didn't do anything and wasn't likely to do
> > > anything. He thinks he can blow up a mall with a couple of hand grenades
> > and he
> > > has no clue how to get a hand grenade anyway.
> > >
> > > But he's muslim. So he's bad. The Christian terroist who actually
killed
> > > people wasn't really evil, he was just confused.
> > >
> > > I'll never figure it out.
> >
> > gary, take us to the second level:
> >
> >
> >
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0612090096dec09,1,3166360.
> > story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed
> >
> > "
> > Crowds of confused commuters built quickly as security guards turned them
> > away from Ogilvie, where roughly 50,000 commuters typically depart on a
> > weeknight.
> >
> > Public address announcements were muffled. Commuters literally bumped into
> > one another, trying to make sense of unintelligible chatter.
> >
> > Hours later, Chicago police would explain that a man had shot and killed
> > three men in a law office and was holding another person hostage before a
> > sniper from a police SWAT team killed him.
> > "
> >
> > if you read the article carefully, you'll find no mention of this
> > murderous man's religious taste (a gutless cover-up, i'll wager). he's
> > done some bad shit, so we know he's religious. but, we're still trying
> > to figure out which religion to blame. any thoughts? i guess if all else
> > fails, we could use old standby and blame the jews.
> >
> > mo_charles
> Gary Carson
> http://www.garycarson.com
thumbers on stars, pokerchimp1 on absolute
------
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 12:10:26
From: WuzYoungOnceToo
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8, 1:55 pm, "Chris H. from Portland, OR" <chris...@comcast.net >
wrote:
>
> Please tell us, then, since you are obviously such an expert on the
> subject, how Iraq and Afghanistan are glowing sucesses?
Since I never said either of them were glowing successes I'll write
your asinine question off as a pointless exercise in hot air
production.
> Why don't you go back and read the threads, dipshit
I did read the threads...including the post you specifically responded
to...moron.
> and then FOAD.
Sorry, I didn't know I was responding to a 12 year-old.
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 11:55:55
From: Chris H. from Portland, OR
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
> On Dec 8, 1:42 pm, "Chris H. from Portland, OR" <chris...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Apparently not, since Afghanistan has become as bad a clusterfuck as Iraq.
>
> You clearly don't have a clue about either place then.
Please tell us, then, since you are obviously such an expert on the
subject, how Iraq and Afghanistan are glowing sucesses?
> > Obviously, you can't read the title. Is your newsreader broken?
>
> Obviously you don't comprehend the difference between the subject line
> and the actual content of the post you specifically responded to. Is
> your head permanently jammed up your ass, or is it a temporary
> condition?
Why don't you go back and read the threads, dipshit, and then FOAD.
-
Chris H. from Portland, OR
Konichiwa, Bitches!
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 11:50:17
From: WuzYoungOnceToo
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
On Dec 8, 1:42 pm, "Chris H. from Portland, OR" <chris...@comcast.net >
wrote:
>
> Apparently not, since Afghanistan has become as bad a clusterfuck as Iraq.
You clearly don't have a clue about either place then.
> Obviously, you can't read the title. Is your newsreader broken?
Obviously you don't comprehend the difference between the subject line
and the actual content of the post you specifically responded to. Is
your head permanently jammed up your ass, or is it a temporary
condition?
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 11:42:07
From: Chris H. from Portland, OR
Subject: Re: Pearl Harbor & 911
|
WuzYoungOnceToo wrote:
> On Dec 7, 11:02 pm, "Chris H. of Portland, OR"
> <chris...@comcast.FUCKOFFSPAMMERS.net> wrote:
> >
> > Apples and Oranges.
> >
> > Pearl Harbor was a military against military combat engagement, albet "sneak
> > attack", but still in the context of a war. America's response was swift and
> > universal: get the bastards responsible. And we did.
> >
> > 9/11 was a civilian attack against civilians in a civilian setting. A
> > non-governmental organization of criminals masterminded it, using a religion
> > as their excuse/scapegoat. America's response was to pay lip service to
> > "getting the bastards responsible" while using the event to attack a
> > completely non-involved country to grab resource rights/settle an old family
> > beef.
>
> We had an old family beef with the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan?
Apparently not, since Afghanistan has become as bad a clusterfuck as
Iraq. Bush couldn't even do the correct war right.
> > Yes, they are obviously the same thing *rolling eyes*
>
> Where the fuck did you see him comparing the two?
Obviously, you can't read the title. Is your newsreader broken?
-
Chris H. from Portland, OR
Konichiwa, Bitches!
|
|
