| |
Main
Date: 14 Dec 2006 11:44:28
From: Omaholic
Subject: OT: NFL Week 15
|
It was a fun and theoretically profitable week last week! An 8-1 week can
sure make up for the two previous lackluster ones. Eleaticus, sorry we
coulnd't middle that IND-JAX game.
Not much I like this week. Give me:
DAL -3 at ATL
JAC -3.5 at TEN
DEN -2.5 at ARZ
STL +2 at OAK
The first two games are pretty marginal, but DEN and STL look pretty good
to me.
____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
|
| |
Date: 14 Dec 2006 15:54:17
From: phlash74
Subject: Re: NFL Week 15
|
On Dec 14, 3:48 pm, "DaVoice" <davoice...@cox.net > wrote:
> "Omaholic" <omaho...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:s5m854xcsf.ln2@recgroups.com...
>
> > It was a fun and theoretically profitable week last week! An 8-1 week can
> > sure make up for the two previous lackluster ones. Eleaticus, sorry we
> > coulnd't middle that IND-JAX game.
>
> > Not much I like this week. Give me:
>
> > DAL -3 at ATL
> > JAC -3.5 at TEN
> > DEN -2.5 at ARZ
> > STL +2 at OAK
>
> > The first two games are pretty marginal, but DEN and STL look pretty good
> > to me.Here are my 6 (yes six) "locks" for the week plus my 3 and 4 teamer and
> long shot pick.
>
> SF +10 @ SEA
>
> SEA is looking for payback for a loss to the 49'ers in SF back in November,
> and they may well get their payback, however there are only two teams that
> Seattle has beaten by 10 pts or more this year, and that is the ridiculously
> bad Green Bay Packers. and the even worse Oakland Raiders, granted the
> horrible Packers did play like a good team last week and beat SF
> unmercifully by 11.
>
> Seattle will most likely win this game, but SF WILL cover the 10 (and even
> 11 on some books) spread without much trouble.
>
> DEN -2.5 @ ARI
>
> No significant injury changes for either team makes this game a
> head-scratcher to me. While we all know Denver has fallen from the upper
> eschelon of teams in the league, I don't think they've fallen far enough to
> only be a FG favorite over a severely struggling Arizona team that they've
> beaten the past three times, as well as covering the spread the past three
> times. The other puzzling thing for me is the O/U line at 41.5. Denver is
> avg'ing 18.1 and allowing 18.2 while Arizona is avg'ing 19.1 and allowing
> 23.5. If I were to bet it I'd look closely at the Under, but I'm not using
> it as one of my picks this week, although I may be sorry later.
>
> DAL -3 @ ATL
>
> The Cowboys have been proving more and more that not only are they bound for
> the playoffs this year, but they are not a "one and out" type of playoff
> team. Atlanta, on the other hand, has also been beating a lot of teams,
> but the comparison of the teams they've been beating is what really matters
> here:
>
> Dallas has dispatched Indianapolis, split with the NYG, clobbered Carolina,
>
> Atlanta has big wins over Tampa, Cleveland, Detroit, Washington, etc.
>
> Here is something I've found myself saying to my son and wife over the last
> two weeks that I NEVER EVER thought I would say out loud. Terrell Owens has
> become a SuperStar Player without all of the bullshit on/off field
> crybabyish nonsense. Parcells may have been the only coach and Jones the
> only owner in the league that could have combined to bring it out in him,
> but he has become the ULTIMATE TEAM PLAYER. He's throwing blocks, catching
> balls over the middle, not bitching on the sidelines or in the press, and
> having a HUGE year.. Anyway, this is a LOCK Dallas -3
>
> STL + 3 @ OAK
>
> The opening line on this game was PK (pickem), and as usual the Raider
> Nation has moved the line by betting like the homer morons they are THREE
> ENTIRE POINTS the other way! Keep it up Raider Nation, we love you,
> especially in recent December games where you are 2-9 vs ATS. God love ya
> Raider Fans.
>
> Now let's look realistically at this game. The Rams are having the worst
> year they've had since before Vermeil came out of retirement, but not bad
> enough to lose to the Raiders. It's that simple, the Raiders are that bad,
> and frankly they're that OLD. They want to win the FIRST PICK IN THE DRAFT
> DERBY, so they don't care about winning another game. STL is injury ridden,
> and Bulger would probably not be a starter on ANY top tier team in the
> league (IMHO). But the Raiders will not win this game, and if they do, it
> won't be by 3.
>
> HOU +11 @ NE AND OVER 37
>
> Now before you go nuts on me, I know it looks like a sucker bet being AT New
> England, but Houston isn't that bad a team. Here is my thinking, the O/U is
> only at 37 and I don't think Houson can be held to less than 14, which means
> that NE would have to score more than their avg 23 ppg to cover which would
> be OVER. I think this game will go over by a few points and NE will win by
> as much as 9 or 10. So therefore, two bets on this game.
>
> 3 team parlay
>
> STL + 3
> DAL - 3
> DEN -2.5
>
> 4 team parlay
>
> STL +3
> DAL -3
> DEN -2.5
> HOU/NE OVER 37
>
> Longshot play of the week: (disclaimer: I'm putting one unit on this
> because I'm up 25 units on longshot plays in the past 6 weeks, not because I
> believe it will win, but if it does, hey....go me!)
>
> WAS +422 @ NEW ORLEANS
>
> Good Luck with your picks this week
>
> Rick "DaVoice" Charles
Arizona's won two straight and Denver's lost four straight. The
Broncos mailed the season in when they switched to Cutler. I won't be
surprised if the Cards win outright at home.
|
| |
Date: 14 Dec 2006 15:48:06
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: NFL Week 15
|
"Omaholic" <omaholic@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:s5m854xcsf.ln2@recgroups.com...
> It was a fun and theoretically profitable week last week! An 8-1 week can
> sure make up for the two previous lackluster ones. Eleaticus, sorry we
> coulnd't middle that IND-JAX game.
>
> Not much I like this week. Give me:
>
> DAL -3 at ATL
> JAC -3.5 at TEN
> DEN -2.5 at ARZ
> STL +2 at OAK
>
> The first two games are pretty marginal, but DEN and STL look pretty good
> to me.
>
Here are my 6 (yes six) "locks" for the week plus my 3 and 4 teamer and
long shot pick.
SF +10 @ SEA
SEA is looking for payback for a loss to the 49'ers in SF back in November,
and they may well get their payback, however there are only two teams that
Seattle has beaten by 10 pts or more this year, and that is the ridiculously
bad Green Bay Packers. and the even worse Oakland Raiders, granted the
horrible Packers did play like a good team last week and beat SF
unmercifully by 11.
Seattle will most likely win this game, but SF WILL cover the 10 (and even
11 on some books) spread without much trouble.
DEN -2.5 @ ARI
No significant injury changes for either team makes this game a
head-scratcher to me. While we all know Denver has fallen from the upper
eschelon of teams in the league, I don't think they've fallen far enough to
only be a FG favorite over a severely struggling Arizona team that they've
beaten the past three times, as well as covering the spread the past three
times. The other puzzling thing for me is the O/U line at 41.5. Denver is
avg'ing 18.1 and allowing 18.2 while Arizona is avg'ing 19.1 and allowing
23.5. If I were to bet it I'd look closely at the Under, but I'm not using
it as one of my picks this week, although I may be sorry later.
DAL -3 @ ATL
The Cowboys have been proving more and more that not only are they bound for
the playoffs this year, but they are not a "one and out" type of playoff
team. Atlanta, on the other hand, has also been beating a lot of teams,
but the comparison of the teams they've been beating is what really matters
here:
Dallas has dispatched Indianapolis, split with the NYG, clobbered Carolina,
Atlanta has big wins over Tampa, Cleveland, Detroit, Washington, etc.
Here is something I've found myself saying to my son and wife over the last
two weeks that I NEVER EVER thought I would say out loud. Terrell Owens has
become a SuperStar Player without all of the bullshit on/off field
crybabyish nonsense. Parcells may have been the only coach and Jones the
only owner in the league that could have combined to bring it out in him,
but he has become the ULTIMATE TEAM PLAYER. He's throwing blocks, catching
balls over the middle, not bitching on the sidelines or in the press, and
having a HUGE year.. Anyway, this is a LOCK Dallas -3
STL + 3 @ OAK
The opening line on this game was PK (pickem), and as usual the Raider
Nation has moved the line by betting like the homer morons they are THREE
ENTIRE POINTS the other way! Keep it up Raider Nation, we love you,
especially in recent December games where you are 2-9 vs ATS. God love ya
Raider Fans.
Now let's look realistically at this game. The Rams are having the worst
year they've had since before Vermeil came out of retirement, but not bad
enough to lose to the Raiders. It's that simple, the Raiders are that bad,
and frankly they're that OLD. They want to win the FIRST PICK IN THE DRAFT
DERBY, so they don't care about winning another game. STL is injury ridden,
and Bulger would probably not be a starter on ANY top tier team in the
league (IMHO). But the Raiders will not win this game, and if they do, it
won't be by 3.
HOU +11 @ NE AND OVER 37
Now before you go nuts on me, I know it looks like a sucker bet being AT New
England, but Houston isn't that bad a team. Here is my thinking, the O/U is
only at 37 and I don't think Houson can be held to less than 14, which means
that NE would have to score more than their avg 23 ppg to cover which would
be OVER. I think this game will go over by a few points and NE will win by
as much as 9 or 10. So therefore, two bets on this game.
3 team parlay
STL + 3
DAL - 3
DEN -2.5
4 team parlay
STL +3
DAL -3
DEN -2.5
HOU/NE OVER 37
Longshot play of the week: (disclaimer: I'm putting one unit on this
because I'm up 25 units on longshot plays in the past 6 weeks, not because I
believe it will win, but if it does, hey....go me!)
WAS +422 @ NEW ORLEANS
Good Luck with your picks this week
Rick "DaVoice" Charles
|
| | |
Date: 14 Dec 2006 20:33:00
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: NFL Week 15
|
"DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net > wrote
> Here are my 6 (yes six) "locks" for the week plus my 3 and 4 teamer and
> long shot pick.
>
>
> SF +10 @ SEA
>
> SEA is looking for payback for a loss to the 49'ers in SF back in
> November, and they may well get their payback, however there are only two
> teams that Seattle has beaten by 10 pts or more this year, and that is the
> ridiculously bad Green Bay Packers. and the even worse Oakland Raiders,
> granted the horrible Packers did play like a good team last week and beat
> SF unmercifully by 11.
>
> Seattle will most likely win this game, but SF WILL cover the 10 (and even
> 11 on some books) spread without much trouble.
The funny thing is I won another $200 in the "Beat the Prick" contest from
SBRforum and actually put $10 on SF to win $36 tonight, just because it was
free money to play with. WHY DIDN"T I PUT IT AS A LOCK?! DAMMIT!
RC
Good start to the week so far!
|
| | | |
Date: 14 Dec 2006 21:45:04
From: RazzO
Subject: Re: NFL Week 15
|
Good thing the 9'ers stopped trying to run the ball.
Nice line on this one.
I watched my first game on The NFL Channel tonight. Not bad, I guess. At
least I see no one can complain about the running box score being in the
way of view.
On Dec 14 2006 8:33 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> The funny thing is I won another $200 in the "Beat the Prick" contest from
> SBRforum and actually put $10 on SF to win $36 tonight, just because it was
> free money to play with. WHY DIDN"T I PUT IT AS A LOCK?! DAMMIT!
>
> RC
> Good start to the week so far!
RazzO
email:ticorazz (at) yahoo.com
http://www.razzo.com
______________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 15 Dec 2006 09:30:55
From: James L. Hankins
Subject: Re: NFL Week 15
|
"RazzO" <razzo@razzo.com > wrote in message
news:vbp954xikh.ln2@recgroups.com...
> Good thing the 9'ers stopped trying to run the ball.
>
> Nice line on this one.
>
> I watched my first game on The NFL Channel tonight. Not bad, I guess. At
> least I see no one can complain about the running box score being in the
> way of view.
I have not read any positive press about the Thursday night broadcast, and I
admit I thought it would suck, but I've been pleasantly surprised.
Gumbel isn't that bad and does a nice job with the play-by-play and
Collinsworth is solid as well.
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2006 21:09:33
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: NFL Week 15
|
"DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net > wrote
>
> Here are my 6 (yes six) "locks" for the week plus my 3 and 4 teamer and
> long shot pick.
>
>
> SF +10 @ SEA
>
> SEA is looking for payback for a loss to the 49'ers in SF back in
> November, and they may well get their payback, however there are only two
> teams that Seattle has beaten by 10 pts or more this year, and that is the
> ridiculously bad Green Bay Packers. and the even worse Oakland Raiders,
> granted the horrible Packers did play like a good team last week and beat
> SF unmercifully by 11.
>
> Seattle will most likely win this game, but SF WILL cover the 10 (and even
> 11 on some books) spread without much trouble.
>
>
>
> DAL -3 @ ATL
>
> The Cowboys have been proving more and more that not only are they bound
> for the playoffs this year, but they are not a "one and out" type of
> playoff team. Atlanta, on the other hand, has also been beating a lot of
> teams, but the comparison of the teams they've been beating is what really
> matters here:
>
> Dallas has dispatched Indianapolis, split with the NYG, clobbered
> Carolina,
>
> Atlanta has big wins over Tampa, Cleveland, Detroit, Washington, etc.
>
> Here is something I've found myself saying to my son and wife over the
> last two weeks that I NEVER EVER thought I would say out loud. Terrell
> Owens has become a SuperStar Player without all of the bullshit on/off
> field crybabyish nonsense. Parcells may have been the only coach and
> Jones the only owner in the league that could have combined to bring it
> out in him, but he has become the ULTIMATE TEAM PLAYER. He's throwing
> blocks, catching balls over the middle, not bitching on the sidelines or
> in the press, and having a HUGE year.. Anyway, this is a LOCK Dallas -3
> DEN -2.5 @ ARI
>
> No significant injury changes for either team makes this game a
> head-scratcher to me. While we all know Denver has fallen from the upper
> eschelon of teams in the league, I don't think they've fallen far enough
> to only be a FG favorite over a severely struggling Arizona team that
> they've beaten the past three times, as well as covering the spread the
> past three times. The other puzzling thing for me is the O/U line at
> 41.5. Denver is avg'ing 18.1 and allowing 18.2 while Arizona is avg'ing
> 19.1 and allowing 23.5. If I were to bet it I'd look closely at the
> Under, but I'm not using it as one of my picks this week, although I may
> be sorry later.
TWO FOR TWO SO FAR BAYBEEEE!!! I think this may be the week of "DaVoice"
and the season of "DaChargers".
Rick "DaVoice" Charles
|
|
