| |
Main
Date: 12 Dec 2006 22:57:36
From: Eric Rosenberg
Subject: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
This is from an interview conducted by Bernard Chapin that appeared on
pokernews.com:
BC: Also, are you thinking of becoming a politician? If so, what kind of
office do you desire? What types of positions would you support?
GR: In many ways, I would not make a good politician, at least not the
way the business of politics presently works in our country. I am not
very good at compromising. If you convince me you are right, I will
agree with you, but until you do, I will do what I think is the smartest
thing to do. Having said that, I am currently talking to some people who
run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
Party.
--
Watch Poker TV!
Watch CNN, ABC, Sports Networks & More!
at the all new: http://www.PokerUpdates.com
|
|
| |
Date: 16 Dec 2006 15:18:16
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
"Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com > wrote in message
news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> This is from an interview conducted by Bernard Chapin that appeared on
> pokernews.com:
>
> BC: Also, are you thinking of becoming a politician? If so, what kind of
> office do you desire? What types of positions would you support?
>
> GR: In many ways, I would not make a good politician, at least not the
> way the business of politics presently works in our country. I am not
> very good at compromising. If you convince me you are right, I will
> agree with you, but until you do, I will do what I think is the smartest
> thing to do. Having said that, I am currently talking to some people who
> run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
> party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
> a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
> Party.
\
In other words, the organized Libertarian Party needs a huge CASH infusion
and is looking to someone who is well known, well liked, has a big bankroll,
and his backers have a MEGA BANKROLL. To my friends that own and control
Pstars. HOLD ON TO YOUR WALLETS!!!
Rick "DaVoice" Charles
|
| | |
Date: 16 Dec 2006 19:17:23
From: mccard
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
"DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net > wrote in message
news:T8%gh.70866$xM4.5335@newsfe07.phx...
>
> "Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com> wrote in message
> news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>> This is from an interview conducted by Bernard Chapin that appeared on
>> pokernews.com:
>>
>> BC: Also, are you thinking of becoming a politician? If so, what kind of
>> office do you desire? What types of positions would you support?
>>
>> GR: In many ways, I would not make a good politician, at least not the
>> way the business of politics presently works in our country. I am not
>> very good at compromising. If you convince me you are right, I will
>> agree with you, but until you do, I will do what I think is the smartest
>> thing to do. Having said that, I am currently talking to some people who
>> run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
>> party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
>> a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
>> Party.
> \
>
> In other words, the organized Libertarian Party needs a huge CASH infusion
> and is looking to someone who is well known, well liked, has a big
> bankroll, and his backers have a MEGA BANKROLL. To my friends that own
> and control Pstars. HOLD ON TO YOUR WALLETS!!!
>
> Rick "DaVoice" Charles
>
I believe I endorsed Mr Raymer for President in this newgroup on October 2nd
of this year. I would not like to see him settle for the VP slot. America
needs smart poker savvy leadership, Greg Raymer for President.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 15:46:56
From: Lou Krieger
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
"DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net > wrote in message
news:T8%gh.70866$xM4.5335@newsfe07.phx...
>
> "Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com> wrote in message
> news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>> I am currently talking to some people who
>> run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
>> party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
>> a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
>> Party.
I'm registered as a Libertarian and would gladly support Greg's candidacy
for Vice-President.
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 10:24:15
From: mccard
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
"Lou Krieger" <loukrieger@verizon.net > wrote in message
news:QDdhh.196$4Q6.69@trnddc06...
>
> "DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:T8%gh.70866$xM4.5335@newsfe07.phx...
>>
>> "Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com> wrote in message
>> news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
>>> I am currently talking to some people who
>>> run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
>>> party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
>>> a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
>>> Party.
>
> I'm registered as a Libertarian and would gladly support Greg's candidacy
> for Vice-President.
VP run is a mistake, he needs to run for President. Who in the Libertarian
party has more name recognition than Greg?
|
| | | | |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 10:44:14
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
Not saying I wouldn't vote for Greg. But I would need to know a lot more
of his thoughts on the issues (other than poker) than merely stating he is
a libertarian.
On Dec 17 2006 11:24 AM, mccard wrote:
> "Lou Krieger" <loukrieger@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:QDdhh.196$4Q6.69@trnddc06...
> >
> > "DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:T8%gh.70866$xM4.5335@newsfe07.phx...
> >>
> >> "Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> >
> >>> I am currently talking to some people who
> >>> run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
> >>> party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
> >>> a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
> >>> Party.
> >
> > I'm registered as a Libertarian and would gladly support Greg's candidacy
> > for Vice-President.
> VP run is a mistake, he needs to run for President. Who in the Libertarian
> party has more name recognition than Greg?
thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
_____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 18:14:52
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:24:15 -0600, "mccard" <mcsoft@cox.net > wrote:
>"Lou Krieger" <loukrieger@verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:QDdhh.196$4Q6.69@trnddc06...
>> "DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:T8%gh.70866$xM4.5335@newsfe07.phx...
>>> "Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>>>> I am currently talking to some people who
>>>> run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
>>>> party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
>>>> a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
>>>> Party.
>> I'm registered as a Libertarian and would gladly support Greg's candidacy
>> for Vice-President.
>VP run is a mistake, he needs to run for President. Who in the Libertarian
>party has more name recognition than Greg?
Ron Paul, even if he calls himself a Republican.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 18 Dec
From: arlo payne
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
On Dec 17 2006 4:14 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:24:15 -0600, "mccard" wrote:
>
> >"Lou Krieger" wrote in message
> >news:QDdhh.196$4Q6.69@trnddc06...
>
> >> "DaVoice" wrote in message
> >> news:T8%gh.70866$xM4.5335@newsfe07.phx...
>
> >>> "Eric Rosenberg" wrote in message
> >>> news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
> >>>> I am currently talking to some people who
> >>>> run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
> >>>> party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
> >>>> a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
> >>>> Party.
>
> >> I'm registered as a Libertarian and would gladly support Greg's candidacy
> >> for Vice-President.
>
> >VP run is a mistake, he needs to run for President. Who in the Libertarian
> >party has more name recognition than Greg?
>
> Ron Paul, even if he calls himself a Republican.
VOTE ARLO OR DON'T VOTE AT ALL!
_______________________________________________________________
New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Dec 2006 16:18:50
From: Eric Rosenberg
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
From: Lou Krieger (loukrieger@verizon.net)
> I'm registered as a Libertarian and would
> gladly support Greg's candidacy for Vice
> President.
You would support him without hearing his views on Iraq, Iran,
Terrorism, Poverty, Housing costs, Israel, Unemployment, Abortion, or
Taxes?
Just because somebody runs with a particular party doesn't mean that you
know his own personal views on all matters. Don't you think that
knowing those views is important before supporting somebody for a
position that is basically one bullet away from the leader of the free
world?
--
Watch Poker TV!
Watch CNN, ABC, Sports Networks & More!
at the all new: http://www.PokerUpdates.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 13:58:43
From: Lou Krieger
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
"Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com > wrote in message
news:1166393930_23937@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> You would support him without hearing his views on Iraq, Iran,
> Terrorism, Poverty, Housing costs, Israel, Unemployment, Abortion, or
> Taxes?
>
> Just because somebody runs with a particular party doesn't mean that you
> know his own personal views on all matters. Don't you think that
> knowing those views is important before supporting somebody for a
> position that is basically one bullet away from the leader of the free
> world?
I support the majority of Libertarian positions. Greg said he would support
that same platform, so I think I have a decent take on his beliefs.
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 07:42:04
From: Iceman
Subject: Re: Greg Raymer: Libertarian Vice President
|
DaVoice wrote:
> "Eric Rosenberg" <eric@pokerTVnetworkREMOVE.com> wrote in message
> news:1165985856_6313@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> > This is from an interview conducted by Bernard Chapin that appeared on
> > pokernews.com:
> >
> > BC: Also, are you thinking of becoming a politician? If so, what kind of
> > office do you desire? What types of positions would you support?
> >
> > GR: In many ways, I would not make a good politician, at least not the
> > way the business of politics presently works in our country. I am not
> > very good at compromising. If you convince me you are right, I will
> > agree with you, but until you do, I will do what I think is the smartest
> > thing to do. Having said that, I am currently talking to some people who
> > run the Libertarian Party about the possibility of running to be the
> > party's official candidate for Vice President of the United States. With
> > a few exceptions, I would support the official planks of the Libertarian
> > Party.
> \
>
> In other words, the organized Libertarian Party needs a huge CASH infusion
> and is looking to someone who is well known, well liked, has a big bankroll,
> and his backers have a MEGA BANKROLL. To my friends that own and control
> Pstars. HOLD ON TO YOUR WALLETS!!!
Raymer for VP! I would love to see the Libertarian Party get 2% of the
national vote...it would easily throw a close election to the Democrats!
|
|
