| |
Main
Date: 29 Nov 18:30:15
From: Teabagger
Subject: Expectations - STTs
|
I posted a question earlier re: expectations for STTs.
The answers I got talked about ROI - Return on Investment. How does this apply
to STTs?
For example:
If I entered 100 $20 SNGs with a $2 vig, total investment of $2200, what would
be the ROI if expected ROI were met?
if the expected ROI were 13%, would my expected winnings be $286?
a 13% ROI seems pretty low.
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 21:00:10
From: tourneytracker.net
Subject: Re: Expectations - STTs
|
http://www.tourneytracker.net/ calculates all of this.
I heard that 20% is good for STT.
but 13% seems decent. I have had steaks at 10% or lower and streaks of 30% or
higher but for me it seems to avg out around 20%
On Nov 29 2006 1:30 PM, Teabagger wrote:
>
> I posted a question earlier re: expectations for STTs.
>
> The answers I got talked about ROI - Return on Investment. How does this apply
> to STTs?
>
> For example:
>
> If I entered 100 $20 SNGs with a $2 vig, total investment of $2200, what would
> be the ROI if expected ROI were met?
>
> if the expected ROI were 13%, would my expected winnings be $286?
>
> a 13% ROI seems pretty low.
_______________________________________________________________
Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2006 21:00:03
From: Patti Beadles
Subject: Re: Expectations - STTs
|
In article <1164825015$913179@recpoker.com >,
Teabagger <43078607@recpoker.com > wrote:
>If I entered 100 $20 SNGs with a $2 vig, total investment of $2200, what would
>be the ROI if expected ROI were met?
>if the expected ROI were 13%, would my expected winnings be $286?
Yes, that's precisely right.
>a 13% ROI seems pretty low.
Some people can do a little bit better. Most will do significantly
worse than that. 13% is a perfectly respectable ROI for the
standard 5-3-2 SNG structure.
If your goal is to make significant money rather than just enjoying
yourself and making a small profit, then you need to play bigger
stakes. Remember, too, that you can multi-table these pretty
easily.
-Patti
--
Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2006 12:33:36
From: Aodhan
Subject: Re: Expectations - STTs
|
> If I entered 100 $20 SNGs with a $2 vig, total investment of $2200, what
would
> be the ROI if expected ROI were met?
>
> if the expected ROI were 13%, would my expected winnings be $286?
>
> a 13% ROI seems pretty low.
13% is actually close to standard. This works out to 2.86 ROI per tourney,
most STT's take about an hour. If you want to make more, then you either
need to move up in limits or multitable.
Aodhan
________________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2006 12:09:44
From: Teo
Subject: Re: Expectations - STTs
|
> If I entered 100 $20 SNGs with a $2 vig, total investment of $2200, what would
> be the ROI if expected ROI were met?
>
> if the expected ROI were 13%, would my expected winnings be $286?
I presume those discussing ROI refer to positive return, that is,
return above
and beyond your invested principal. So 13% ROI would reflect winning
$2486,
for a profit of $286.
Teo
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 19:59:02
From: Stu Ungar Fan
Subject: Re: Expectations - STTs
|
> a 13% ROI seems pretty low.
Actually, it's standard. If you want to make more dollars per hour you have to
move up to a higher buy-in STTs.
http://stuungar.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
|
