| |
Main
Date: 18 Dec 2006 06:41:35
From: mo_charles
Subject: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
thanks in advance!
mo_charles
_______________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 08:09:38
From: wadner
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
mo_charles wrote:
> i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
>
> thanks in advance!
>
> mo_charles
>
Well I don't really believe a Jewish lesbian can judge the ignorance of
posts related to anything other than lesbian posts, maybe some Jewish
posts as well. We need to create a Board of Ignorance Judgers composed
of all sorts of minorities and member of the majority.
Any volunteers?
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 16:34:30
From: Smorgass Bored
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
On Dec 18 2006 12:09 PM, wadner wrote:
> mo_charles wrote:
> > i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> > either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> > or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> > think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
> >
> > thanks in advance!
> >
> > mo_charles
> >
>
> Well I don't really believe a Jewish lesbian can judge the ignorance of
> posts related to anything other than lesbian posts, maybe some Jewish
> posts as well. We need to create a Board of Ignorance Judgers composed
> of all sorts of minorities and member of the majority.
>
> Any volunteers?
Will the fact that I come from a long line of ignoramouses help my appointment ?
Doug
Feverishly Trying To Outrun The Bots
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 07:08:43
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
LOL Now come on Mo, I have only done that one time in the 2-3 years I've
been on RGP. I won't back down though, it was a totally ignorant post.
I've already responded to several naysayers. Anyone who judges people by
their haircuts as being child abusers is simply ignorant. If you disagree
with that, you are entitled to your opinion, but it won't change mine.
Also, I'll post any damn thing I want. Your sarcasm is duly noted.
On Dec 18 2006 9:41 AM, mo_charles wrote:
> i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
>
> thanks in advance!
>
> mo_charles
thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
____________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 08:03:37
From: mo_charles
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
> > i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> > either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> > or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> > think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
> >
> > thanks in advance!
>
> LOL Now come on Mo, I have only done that one time in the 2-3 years I've
> been on RGP. I won't back down though, it was a totally ignorant post.
> I've already responded to several naysayers. Anyone who judges people by
> their haircuts as being child abusers is simply ignorant. If you disagree
> with that, you are entitled to your opinion, but it won't change mine.
> Also, I'll post any damn thing I want. Your sarcasm is duly noted.
laughing at my idea, and calling me sarcastic? i respect your take a lot,
but on this particular case, i'm going to have to tell you that you're way
off base. i'm not sure how you got there because your liberal, lesbian
perspective is usually brilliant - but on this occassion, you've
completely misunderstood. like i said, you're usually right just not this
time.
i usually defer to my own understanding of posts to make sense of the
fundamental ideas in play - for instance, when gary carson says kilgore
trout is a worthless piece of shit, i'm inclined to believe he's being
serious. kilgore trout has demonstrated on numerous occassions what a
worthless, lying piece of shit he is, so gary is obviously telling the
truth. when gary says pickle is lying, well, then i know he's being
sarcastic because everybody knows pickle is one of the wise, old men of
rgp and as such never lies. see? i didn't need you tell me what to think
on those two specific instances, but that's just because they were so
EASY. however, for the most part, i really need your help (as do others
around here - that's my guess anyway). are you sure you can't take a
little time out of your busy schedule to post some kind of helpful ratings
system. imagine the time we'd all save if we could simply rely on your
read BEFORE wasting our valuable time on all those stupid people's
ignorant posts. if you need help coming up with a decent system (which
i'm sure you don't), let me know.
thanks again!
mo_charles
_______________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 16:42:21
From: Paul Popinjay
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
"mo_charles" <harrybalzer@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:pnqi54xhf9.ln2@recgroups.com...
> kilgore trout has demonstrated on numerous occassions what a
> worthless, lying piece of shit he is,
>
I like that quality in a man.
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 15:29:23
From: Brian
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
Pokerchimp, have you ever heard eaten at the Cheesecake Factory? Their food
isn't very good. It isn't bad, but it isn't good. It's just there. I've always
been of the opinion that to make up for the quality of their food, they overload
you with quantity.
On Dec 18 2006 9:08 AM, pokerchimp wrote:
> LOL Now come on Mo, I have only done that one time in the 2-3 years I've
> been on RGP. I won't back down though, it was a totally ignorant post.
> I've already responded to several naysayers. Anyone who judges people by
> their haircuts as being child abusers is simply ignorant. If you disagree
> with that, you are entitled to your opinion, but it won't change mine.
> Also, I'll post any damn thing I want. Your sarcasm is duly noted.
> On Dec 18 2006 9:41 AM, mo_charles wrote:
>
> > i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> > either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> > or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> > think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
> >
> > thanks in advance!
> >
> > mo_charles
>
>
> thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 20:16:20
From: Bill Starr
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
On Dec 18 2006 9:08 AM, pokerchimp wrote:
> LOL Now come on Mo, I have only done that one time in the 2-3 years I've
> been on RGP. I won't back down though, it was a totally ignorant post.
> I've already responded to several naysayers. Anyone who judges people by
> their haircuts as being child abusers is simply ignorant. If you disagree
> with that, you are entitled to your opinion, but it won't change mine.
> Also, I'll post any damn thing I want. Your sarcasm is duly noted.
> On Dec 18 2006 9:41 AM, mo_charles wrote:
>
> > i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> > either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> > or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> > think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
> >
> > thanks in advance!
> >
> > mo_charles
>
>
> thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
pokerchimp, what I mostly want to know is do you have any tattoos, and if so
where? There has been so much interest in Annie Duke's that it just seems
reasonable for you to divulge this information. And by the way, just ignore all
those ignorant,mean, sarcasic remarks aimed at you lately.
Bill
_______________________________________________________________
* New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2006 15:12:19
From: pokerchimp
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
No tatoos, no more posts for a while. Tired of you people. Have a good
day.
On Dec 18 2006 3:16 PM, Bill Starr wrote:
> On Dec 18 2006 9:08 AM, pokerchimp wrote:
>
> > LOL Now come on Mo, I have only done that one time in the 2-3 years I've
> > been on RGP. I won't back down though, it was a totally ignorant post.
> > I've already responded to several naysayers. Anyone who judges people by
> > their haircuts as being child abusers is simply ignorant. If you disagree
> > with that, you are entitled to your opinion, but it won't change mine.
> > Also, I'll post any damn thing I want. Your sarcasm is duly noted.
> > On Dec 18 2006 9:41 AM, mo_charles wrote:
> >
> > > i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> > > either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> > > or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> > > think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
> > >
> > > thanks in advance!
> > >
> > > mo_charles
> >
> >
> > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
>
>
> pokerchimp, what I mostly want to know is do you have any tattoos, and if so
> where? There has been so much interest in Annie Duke's that it just seems
> reasonable for you to divulge this information. And by the way, just ignore
all
> those ignorant,mean, sarcasic remarks aimed at you lately.
>
> Bill
thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 19 Dec 14:07:54
From: Brian
Subject: Re: Attn: Pokerchimp
|
My Cheesecake Factory analogy hit home?
On Dec 18 2006 5:12 PM, pokerchimp wrote:
> No tatoos, no more posts for a while. Tired of you people. Have a good
> day.
>
> On Dec 18 2006 3:16 PM, Bill Starr wrote:
>
> > On Dec 18 2006 9:08 AM, pokerchimp wrote:
> >
> > > LOL Now come on Mo, I have only done that one time in the 2-3 years I've
> > > been on RGP. I won't back down though, it was a totally ignorant post.
> > > I've already responded to several naysayers. Anyone who judges people by
> > > their haircuts as being child abusers is simply ignorant. If you disagree
> > > with that, you are entitled to your opinion, but it won't change mine.
> > > Also, I'll post any damn thing I want. Your sarcasm is duly noted.
> > > On Dec 18 2006 9:41 AM, mo_charles wrote:
> > >
> > > > i was wondering if you could read every thread on the ng and rate them
> > > > either ignorant or enlightened (maybe use a sliding scale from .1 to 9.9
> > > > or something). i know that i really respect your read on things, and
> > > > think the community would benefit from this profound insight.
> > > >
> > > > thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > > mo_charles
> > >
> > >
> > > thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
> >
> >
> > pokerchimp, what I mostly want to know is do you have any tattoos, and if so
> > where? There has been so much interest in Annie Duke's that it just seems
> > reasonable for you to divulge this information. And by the way, just ignore
> all
> > those ignorant,mean, sarcasic remarks aimed at you lately.
> >
> > Bill
>
>
> thumbers on stars, dieseldyke on absolute/vegaspoker24/7
_______________________________________________________________
* New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
|
|
