| |
Main
Date: 01 Dec 16:11:37
From: Teabagger
Subject: All-in situation
|
Hypothetical:
Mid stages of a stt, 6 players left. Blinds at 50-100. I have an average
stack(1500). I limp with KQs from MP, the button(T1000) limps and the BB
(T1000) checks. Flop is As, 9s, 4d.
I check, the button with the short stack pushes in with 900, the BB with 900
calls.
the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush draw.
should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I am
crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
_______________________________________________________________
New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
|
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 17:48:02
From: Al Gore's Dead Cat
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
"Teabagger" <43078607@recpoker.com > wrote in message
> the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush
> draw.
> should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I
> am
> crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
I don't know about others, but 100% of the time when I do that I miss the
flush. However, when people do it against me, they hit it 100% of the time.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Dec 18:12:17
From: freakinfoldalready
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
please mark your response with bad beat whine next time.
On Dec 1 2006 12:48 PM, Al Gore's Dead Cat wrote:
> "Teabagger" <43078607@recpoker.com> wrote in message
> > the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush
> > draw.
> > should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I
> > am
> > crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
>
> I don't know about others, but 100% of the time when I do that I miss the
> flush. However, when people do it against me, they hit it 100% of the time.
_______________________________________________________________
Your Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 08:55:58
From: xyious
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
On Dec 1 2006 5:11 PM, Teabagger wrote:
> Hypothetical:
>
> Mid stages of a stt, 6 players left. Blinds at 50-100. I have an average
> stack(1500). I limp with KQs from MP, the button(T1000) limps and the BB
> (T1000) checks. Flop is As, 9s, 4d.
>
> I check, the button with the short stack pushes in with 900, the BB with 900
> calls.
>
> the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush
draw.
> should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I am
> crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
knowing the other stack sizes would be helpful.
but with anything but extreme situations i'm probably calling here.
-Alexander Knopf
http://www.xyious.com/?links
________________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 11:22:11
From: John B.
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
Two cards left to go with no real scare cards on the flop? I'd go for it.
For the reason you stated. Gotta gamble sometimes.
John B.
"Teabagger" <43078607@recpoker.com > wrote in message
news:1164989497$914662@recpoker.com...
>
> Hypothetical:
>
> Mid stages of a stt, 6 players left. Blinds at 50-100. I have an average
> stack(1500). I limp with KQs from MP, the button(T1000) limps and the BB
> (T1000) checks. Flop is As, 9s, 4d.
>
> I check, the button with the short stack pushes in with 900, the BB with
900
> calls.
>
> the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush
draw.
> should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I
am
> crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 13:57:58
From: Bill Ricardi
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
Teabagger wrote:
> Hypothetical:
>
> Mid stages of a stt, 6 players left. Blinds at 50-100. I have an average
> stack(1500). I limp with KQs from MP, the button(T1000) limps and the BB
> (T1000) checks. Flop is As, 9s, 4d.
>
> I check, the button with the short stack pushes in with 900, the BB with 900
> calls.
>
> the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush draw.
> should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I am
> crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
Must call. Nut flush draw and runners? Pot SHOULD be at 2150 unless no
SB for some reason. And M 4 can be recovered from. Do it.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 17:46:32
From: Bill Ricardi
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
ben carr wrote:
> The pot odds are near what you want to call, but for all of my money pot
> odds become less valuable to me.
But it wasn't all your money. M 4 left. There's a chance for a comeback
there.
|
| | |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 19:48:12
From: ben carr
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
The pot odds are near what you want to call, but for all of my money pot
odds become less valuable to me. For me my decision would have been
based on the other players. If I think the others are just trying to go
broke by playing wrecklessly then I might fold. I would convince myself
that I could get all of my money in when I am in the lead and that they
would go along with me and give me their money. If they arent crazy and
wont go broke when behind I think it is an easy call here.
|
| |
Date: 01 Dec 2006 11:32:16
From: Grip
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
Easy call.
Your odds are slightly a little low if someone already has a set, but
if your hand draws out you'll have 3500/9000 of the chips in play and
4 players left.
Teabagger wrote:
> Hypothetical:
>
> Mid stages of a stt, 6 players left. Blinds at 50-100. I have an average
> stack(1500). I limp with KQs from MP, the button(T1000) limps and the BB
> (T1000) checks. Flop is As, 9s, 4d.
>
> I check, the button with the short stack pushes in with 900, the BB with 900
> calls.
>
> the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush draw.
> should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I am
> crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
|
| |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 19:14:12
From: FellKnight
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
On Dec 1 2006 9:11 AM, Teabagger wrote:
> Hypothetical:
>
> Mid stages of a stt, 6 players left. Blinds at 50-100. I have an average
> stack(1500). I limp with KQs from MP, the button(T1000) limps and the BB
> (T1000) checks. Flop is As, 9s, 4d.
>
> I check, the button with the short stack pushes in with 900, the BB with 900
> calls.
>
> the pot is at $2100. Since I am getting better than 2-1 with the nut flush
draw.
> should i call here? If I hit the flush, I am the chip leader. If I miss I am
> crippled, being down to $600 and an M of 4.
In an STT, I think a fold may be in order, but it is strictly because of
the payouts. In a cash game or an MTT, I call here all day long.
Fell
--
Website: www.fellknight.com
Email: fellknight at gmail dot com
_____________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 03 Dec 2006 03:30:42
From: Palooka
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
"FellKnight" wrote:
>
> In an STT, I think a fold may be in order, but it is strictly because of
> the payouts. In a cash game or an MTT, I call here all day long.
>
Yes, but would you be limping in the first place?
Palooka
|
| | | |
Date: 02 Dec 2006 19:58:50
From: FellKnight
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
On Dec 2 2006 8:30 PM, Palooka wrote:
> "FellKnight" wrote:
> >
> > In an STT, I think a fold may be in order, but it is strictly because of
> > the payouts. In a cash game or an MTT, I call here all day long.
> >
> Yes, but would you be limping in the first place?
>
> Palooka
Me? Hell fucking no :)
Fell
--
Website: www.fellknight.com
Email: fellknight at gmail dot com
______________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 03 Dec 2006 21:53:02
From: Palooka
Subject: Re: All-in situation
|
"FellKnight" <jordandevenport@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:qku944x9ga.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Dec 2 2006 8:30 PM, Palooka wrote:
>
>> "FellKnight" wrote:
>> >
>> > In an STT, I think a fold may be in order, but it is strictly because
>> > of
>> > the payouts. In a cash game or an MTT, I call here all day long.
>> >
>> Yes, but would you be limping in the first place?
>>
>> Palooka
>
> Me? Hell fucking no :)
>
Thought not.
Palooka
|
|
