pokerfied.com
Promoting poker discussions.

Main
Date: 08 Jan 2009 10:19:54
From: Jason Pawloski
Subject: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1

--
"Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)

____________________________________________________________________ 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com






 
Date: 08 Jan 2009 18:14:33
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?

"Jason Pawloski" <a6794a4@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:ansh36xdlk.ln2@recgroups.com...
> Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1

Isn't "Durr" that Pee Wee Herman looking internet player? Has this guy ever
won a WSOP bracelet or even a live poker tournament? Other than an episode
on Poker After Dark, all I ever saw him do was go all in against Phil
Helmuth early in their National Heads-Up Championship match. Helmuth seemed
to have a good read on Pee Wee and to be able to jerk his chain at will.
Pee Wee went all in with TT and Helmuth called with AA. Pee Wee got lucky
and hit a T on the turn and cracked Helmuth's pocket Aces. I didn't see the
Pee Wee vs. Ivy game.

Irish Mike




  
Date: 08 Jan 2009 19:46:50
From: Arlo-Payne
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 4:14 PM, Irish Mike wrote:

> "Jason Pawloski" <a6794a4@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:ansh36xdlk.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
>
> Isn't "Durr" that Pee Wee Herman looking internet player? Has this guy ever
> won a WSOP bracelet or even a live poker tournament? Other than an episode
> on Poker After Dark, all I ever saw him do was go all in against Phil
> Helmuth early in their National Heads-Up Championship match. Helmuth seemed
> to have a good read on Pee Wee and to be able to jerk his chain at will.
> Pee Wee went all in with TT and Helmuth called with AA. Pee Wee got lucky
> and hit a T on the turn and cracked Helmuth's pocket Aces. I didn't see the
> Pee Wee vs. Ivy game.
>
> Irish Mike

Mike you have seen this shit before nothing real here just making an image
to draw people in.
None of the upper people at FTP make money playing poker anymore. They
make so much from FTP they can burn any poker winnings in a fireplace.

Must say I love how people still buy this crap as real.
Move the game from FTP and let s see if they wiill still offer the deal.
If so I will take a slice of Danny N. on pokerstars any time against FTPs
new superstar in the making.

____________________________________________________________________ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com



   
Date: 10 Jan 2009 22:43:13
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 9:46 PM, Arlo-Payne wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 4:14 PM, Irish Mike wrote:
>
> > "Jason Pawloski" <a6794a4@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:ansh36xdlk.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> >
> > Isn't "Durr" that Pee Wee Herman looking internet player? Has this guy
ever
> > won a WSOP bracelet or even a live poker tournament? Other than an
episode
> > on Poker After Dark, all I ever saw him do was go all in against Phil
> > Helmuth early in their National Heads-Up Championship match. Helmuth
seemed
> > to have a good read on Pee Wee and to be able to jerk his chain at will.
> > Pee Wee went all in with TT and Helmuth called with AA. Pee Wee got lucky
> > and hit a T on the turn and cracked Helmuth's pocket Aces. I didn't see
the
> > Pee Wee vs. Ivy game.
> >
> > Irish Mike
>
> Mike you have seen this shit before nothing real here just making an image
> to draw people in.
> None of the upper people at FTP make money playing poker anymore. They
> make so much from FTP they can burn any poker winnings in a fireplace.
>
> Must say I love how people still buy this crap as real.
> Move the game from FTP and let s see if they wiill still offer the deal.
> If so I will take a slice of Danny N. on pokerstars any time against FTPs
> new superstar in the making.

better be carefuyl about that .. Negraneau almost got broke with his 500k
HU challenge matches

He didnt like it when it was over

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire

_______________________________________________________________________ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



 
Date: 08 Jan 2009 10:25:29
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:

> Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1

YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?

I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
>
> --
> "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)


Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire

------- 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com




  
Date: 08 Jan 2009 14:54:19
From:
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8, 4:06=A0pm, "John_Brian_K" <a7ec...@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>
> After 50k hands whoever is ahead wins. =A0he is putting his money on Durr=
.
> I know this is hard to follow.

I think this challenge has almost no chance of getting to 50K hands.
Someone will go on a big downswing and quit (and be forced to pay the
side bet of 500K or 1500K).

JG


  
Date: 08 Jan 2009 10:58:28
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 12:25 PM, FangBanger wrote:

> YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
>
> I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?

So awesome. When I read JP's first message I could actually envision him
throwing the stick and you chasing after it. Thanks for that.

---
Morphy
xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
"SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio

------ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com



   
Date: 08 Jan 2009 14:37:56
From: jonathan
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
ahhahaahahahhaha

On Jan 8 2009 10:58 AM, XaQ Morphy wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 12:25 PM, FangBanger wrote:
>
> > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
> >
> > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
>
> So awesome. When I read JP's first message I could actually envision him
> throwing the stick and you chasing after it. Thanks for that.
>
> ---
> Morphy
> xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
> http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
> "SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio


-------------------------------
me and you... we'll never get along, i hate the way you play your hands
and you wear your gun all wrong

------ 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com




  
Date: 08 Jan 2009 10:36:00
From: Jason Pawloski
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
>
> > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
>
> YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
>
> I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> >
> > --
> > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
>
>
> Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
> Voltaire

Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.

--
"Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)

------- 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com



   
Date: 08 Jan 2009 21:48:36
From: Lynx
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
> The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.

Okay it's better odds, but that 2-1 still doesn't mean that the odds are
in your favor.

3-1 is a side bet that DURRRR is offering to get someone to play him. The
total amount won or lost is likely to be much greater than the side bet in
and of itself.

Durrrr does not have to believe his odds against his opponent are that
much greater to offer the side bet. If the amount won or lost on the
actual hands is well into the millions, than the 3-1 side bet may be a
small percentage of that.

Taking the hands and the side bet together is very different than taking
the side bet alone. Durrrr doesn't have to believe that he is a 3-1
favorite. He doesn't even have to believe that he is a 2-1 favorite, to
sensibly make the bet.

________________________________________________________________________ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com



   
Date: 08 Jan 2009 21:06:37
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 11:36 AM, Jason Pawloski wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> >
> > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
> >
> > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
> >
> >
> > Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
> > Voltaire
>
> Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.

Did you mean to say that you'll take durr and lay 2-1?

------- 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



    
Date: 10 Jan 2009 22:41:21
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 11:06 PM, risky biz wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 11:36 AM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> > >
> > > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
> > >
> > > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > > > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
> > >
> > >
> > > Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities.
> > > Voltaire
> >
> > Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.
>
> Did you mean to say that you'll take durr and lay 2-1?

No .. he is trying to pull some grade school "double reverse" bullshit
thinking that anyone over the age of 12 might fall for something that lame
?

Makes you wonder how sharp he thinks he is in comparison to how sharp he
really is !!


Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire

------ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



   
Date: 08 Jan 2009 13:03:07
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 12:36 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> >
> > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
> >
> > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
> >
> >
> > Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
> > Voltaire
>
> Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.

when you ask for 2-1 you are asking for someone to lay you 200 for a 100

r u really that lame ?
>
> --
> "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)


Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire

----- 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



    
Date: 08 Jan 2009 13:19:19
From: Jason Pawloski
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 2:03 PM, FangBanger wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 12:36 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> > >
> > > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
> > >
> > > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > > > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
> > >
> > >
> > > Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities.
> > > Voltaire
> >
> > Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.
>
> when you ask for 2-1 you are asking for someone to lay you 200 for a 100
>
> r u really that lame ?

Yes but Ivey is a 3-1 dog, in other words durr is a 1-3 favorite, so
getting 2-1 on that is a good deal.

> >
> > --
> > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
>
>
> Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
> Voltaire


--
"Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)

------ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com



     
Date: 08 Jan 2009 21:12:47
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 2:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:

> Yes but Ivey is a 3-1 dog, in other words durr is a 1-3 favorite, so
> getting 2-1 on that is a good deal.

WTF are you talking about "Ivey is a 3-1 dog"? Just because Durr offered
that it doesn't automatically reflect Ivey's chances of winning. His
"dogginess" might be accurately reflected if there was widespread
sidebetting.

But anyone who sidebets on this is a fool unless they think they've
figured out what the possible under the table agreement is.

_____________________________________________________________________ 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com




      
Date: 08 Jan 2009 23:12:41
From: Jason Pawloski
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 10:12 PM, risky biz wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 2:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
>
> > Yes but Ivey is a 3-1 dog, in other words durr is a 1-3 favorite, so
> > getting 2-1 on that is a good deal.
>
> WTF are you talking about "Ivey is a 3-1 dog"? Just because Durr offered
> that it doesn't automatically reflect Ivey's chances of winning. His
> "dogginess" might be accurately reflected if there was widespread
> sidebetting.
>
> But anyone who sidebets on this is a fool unless they think they've
> figured out what the possible under the table agreement is.

NO SHIT SHERLOCK !!!

I WAS JUST TRYING TO BAIT DOGGY INTO AN ILL-ADVISED BET !!!!!!

UR AN ASSWIPE !!!!

--
"Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)

--- 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com




       
Date: 10 Jan 2009 22:38:23
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 9 2009 1:12 AM, Jason Pawloski wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 10:12 PM, risky biz wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 2:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> >
> > > Yes but Ivey is a 3-1 dog, in other words durr is a 1-3 favorite, so
> > > getting 2-1 on that is a good deal.
> >
> > WTF are you talking about "Ivey is a 3-1 dog"? Just because Durr offered
> > that it doesn't automatically reflect Ivey's chances of winning. His
> > "dogginess" might be accurately reflected if there was widespread
> > sidebetting.
> >
> > But anyone who sidebets on this is a fool unless they think they've
> > figured out what the possible under the table agreement is.
>
> NO SHIT SHERLOCK !!!
>
> I WAS JUST TRYING TO BAIT DOGGY INTO AN ILL-ADVISED BET !!!!!!
>
> UR AN ASSWIPE !!!!
>
> --
> "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)

and you thought that was a "clever' little trap or something .. that
wouldnt have worked when I was 12 years old .

I was figuring baseball parlays in my head when I was 15 .

How lame are you to think that silly shit might work ?

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire

_____________________________________________________________________ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



       
Date: 08 Jan 2009 23:23:50
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 9 2009 12:12 AM, Jason Pawloski wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 10:12 PM, risky biz wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 2:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> >
> > > Yes but Ivey is a 3-1 dog, in other words durr is a 1-3 favorite, so
> > > getting 2-1 on that is a good deal.
> >
> > WTF are you talking about "Ivey is a 3-1 dog"? Just because Durr offered
> > that it doesn't automatically reflect Ivey's chances of winning. His
> > "dogginess" might be accurately reflected if there was widespread
> > sidebetting.
> >
> > But anyone who sidebets on this is a fool unless they think they've
> > figured out what the possible under the table agreement is.
>
> NO SHIT SHERLOCK !!!
>
> I WAS JUST TRYING TO BAIT DOGGY INTO AN ILL-ADVISED BET !!!!!!
>
> UR AN ASSWIPE !!!!

Why him? Because you both post in all caps? Jesus.

--- 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com




      
Date: 08 Jan 2009 21:52:54
From: Arlo-Payne
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 10:12 PM, risky biz wrote:


> But anyone who sidebets on this is a fool unless they think they've
> figured out what the possible under the table agreement is.

YOU ARE WAY TO KIND.

THIS WHOLE THING IS JUST A SCAM.

_______________________________________________________________________ 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com




    
Date: 08 Jan 2009 13:13:11
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 3:03 PM, FangBanger wrote:

> when you ask for 2-1 you are asking for someone to lay you 200 for a 100
>
> r u really that lame ?

At least he's not telling someone to settle for $60-$70 on a double or
nothing bet.

---
Morphy
xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
"SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio

--- 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



   
Date: 08 Jan 2009 10:51:39
From: jonathan
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
i'll take durrr, even money, for any amount i can beg steal or borrow.
On Jan 8 2009 10:36 AM, Jason Pawloski wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> >
> > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?

you're missing the point. shocking, i know

> >
> > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
> >
> >
> > Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
> > Voltaire
>
> Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.
>
> --
> "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)


-------------------------------
me and you... we'll never get along, i hate the way you play your hands
and you wear your gun all wrong

______________________________________________________________________ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



    
Date: 08 Jan 2009 13:28:08
From: brewmaster
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 10:51 AM, jonathan wrote:

> i'll take durrr, even money, for any amount i can beg steal or borrow.

Why are you so sure Durr will win this? Isn't durr the retard who pushed
TT into Hellmuth's AA and hit his 2 outter, then justified that "anyone
would push there" which was obv untrue. I'm not so sure he is the world's
best HU player like he thinks he is.

> On Jan 8 2009 10:36 AM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> > >
> > > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
>
> you're missing the point. shocking, i know
>
> > >
> > > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > > > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
> > >
> > >
> > > Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities.
> > > Voltaire
> >
> > Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.
> >
> > --
> > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
>
>
> -------------------------------
> me and you... we'll never get along, i hate the way you play your hands
> and you wear your gun all wrong


Brew
--
Email me here: http://tinymail.me/k4r2nk

_______________________________________________________________________ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com



     
Date: 08 Jan 2009 19:42:17
From: Arlo-Payne
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 2:28 PM, brewmaster wrote:

> On Jan 8 2009 10:51 AM, jonathan wrote:
>
> > i'll take durrr, even money, for any amount i can beg steal or borrow.
>
> Why are you so sure Durr will win this? Isn't durr the retard who pushed
> TT into Hellmuth's AA and hit his 2 outter, then justified that "anyone
> would push there" which was obv untrue. I'm not so sure he is the world's
> best HU player like he thinks he is.

100% sure it is just one more scam see them before and will continue to
see them as long as the puppet masters still control the strings.

______________________________________________________________________ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



      
Date: 08 Jan 2009 21:43:02
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:42:17 -0800, "Arlo-Payne"
<arlo_payne@hotmail.com > wrote:

>On Jan 8 2009 2:28 PM, brewmaster wrote:
>
>> On Jan 8 2009 10:51 AM, jonathan wrote:
>>
>> > i'll take durrr, even money, for any amount i can beg steal or borrow.
>>
>> Why are you so sure Durr will win this? Isn't durr the retard who pushed
>> TT into Hellmuth's AA and hit his 2 outter, then justified that "anyone
>> would push there" which was obv untrue. I'm not so sure he is the world's
>> best HU player like he thinks he is.
>
>100% sure it is just one more scam see them before and will continue to
>see them as long as the puppet masters still control the strings.
>

Ooooh, puppet masters.

I do so love new conspiracy theories.

Tell me more.


    
Date: 08 Jan 2009 13:04:53
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 12:51 PM, jonathan wrote:

> i'll take durrr, even money, for any amount i can beg steal or borrow.
> On Jan 8 2009 10:36 AM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8 2009 11:25 AM, FangBanger wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 8 2009 12:19 PM, Jason Pawloski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone want to throw down? I'll take durrrr and I'll take 2 to 1
> > >
> > > YOU WANT 2-1 ON A GUY LAYING 3-1?
>
> you're missing the point. shocking, i know

youre an idiot .. he is asking to get 2 to 1 on a side that is laying 3-1
you ignorant asswipe !!

very sporting

he doesnt and obviously you dont know the difference either

BUT THEN YOU CANT BE EXPECTED TO
>
> > >
> > > I will assume that you didnt re-read this before you posted it ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > > > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
> > >
> > >
> > > Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities.
> > > Voltaire
> >
> > Yes. The odds are in my favor, dumbass. 2-1 is better than 3-1.
> >
> > --
> > "Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
> > Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)
>
>
> -------------------------------
> me and you... we'll never get along, i hate the way you play your hands
> and you wear your gun all wrong


Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire

_______________________________________________________________________ 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com




     
Date: 08 Jan 2009 20:59:16
From: Lynx
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
> youre an idiot .. he is asking to get 2 to 1 on a side that is laying 3-1

No, that's not really true. You've gotten it wrong, as have the vast
majority of others that have posted on this event.

3-1 is a side bet that DURRRR is offering to get someone to play him. The
total amount won or lost is likely to be much greater than the side bet in
and of itself.

Durrrr does not have to believe his odds against his opponent are that
much greater to offer the side bet. If the amount won or lost on the
actual hands is well into the millions, than the 3-1 side bet may be a
small percentage of that.

Taking the hands and the side bet together is very different from taking
the side bet alone. I'm sure that durrrr does not believe that he is that
much of a favorite to to justify the side bet in and of itself.

Anyone that doesn't get that IS totally missing the point.

> you ignorant asswipe !!

You might want to be more careful about making statements like that. If
it applies to others in this situation, it certainly applies to you.

------ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



     
Date: 08 Jan 2009 13:06:48
From: John_Brian_K
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
> BUT THEN YOU CANT BE EXPECTED TO

Hey buddy! He is offering 2-1 that Durr will win the 50k hands result.

After 50k hands whoever is ahead wins. he is putting his money on Durr.
I know this is hard to follow.

========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
========
BOOM byae
John

----- 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



      
Date: 08 Jan 2009 16:14:53
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 3:06 PM, John_Brian_K wrote:

> > BUT THEN YOU CANT BE EXPECTED TO
>
> Hey buddy! He is offering 2-1 that Durr will win the 50k hands result.
>
> After 50k hands whoever is ahead wins. he is putting his money on Durr.
> I know this is hard to follow.

TRY READING IT MORON ..

HE IS TRYING TO "get" 2-1 MAN U R LAME EVEN FOR A MORON FROM DETROIT
>
> ========================================
> You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
> nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
> ========
> BOOM byae
> John


Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire

_____________________________________________________________________ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



      
Date: 08 Jan 2009 13:09:04
From: Jason Pawloski
Subject: Re: durrrr vs Ivey - side action?
On Jan 8 2009 2:06 PM, John_Brian_K wrote:

> > BUT THEN YOU CANT BE EXPECTED TO
>
> Hey buddy! He is offering 2-1 that Durr will win the 50k hands result.
>
> After 50k hands whoever is ahead wins. he is putting his money on Durr.
> I know this is hard to follow.
>
> ========================================
> You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
> nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
> ========
> BOOM byae
> John

Please don't ruin my fun.

--
"Actually, I will read Jason's posts too. He's smart also." - Paul
Popinjay, 10/21/2007 (http://tinyurl.com/4bggyp)

--- 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com