pokerfied.com
Promoting poker discussions.

Main
Date: 09 Feb 2009 02:26:03
From: Travel
Subject: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
The article has some discussion on FDIC protection and the pros and
cons of just letting banks fail.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29084713

_________________________________________________________
Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
Visit www.pokermagazine.com




 
Date: 09 Feb 2009 23:13:50
From: RGP Loner
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
On Feb 9 2009 1:26 AM, Travel wrote:

> The article has some discussion on FDIC protection and the pros and
> cons of just letting banks fail.
>
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29084713
>



This article proposes The Nationalization of failing banks as the solution
to the problem.

It makes the case using the Saving and Loan crises of the 80's as a road
map to solving this current problem.

________________________________________________________________________ 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com




  
Date: 10 Feb 2009 01:46:25
From: Travel
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
No it doesn't, you idiot. It reports the options and consequences being
discussed.

_________________________________________________________
Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
Visit www.pokermagazine.com


   
Date: 10 Feb 2009 01:04:25
From: RGP Loner
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
On Feb 10 2009 12:46 AM, Travel wrote:

> No it doesn't, you idiot. It reports the options and consequences being
> discussed.
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
> Visit www.pokermagazine.com


The only options it discusses are letting the Banks fail, buying the bad
assets off failing banks or Nationalizing the failing banks.

----- 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



    
Date: 10 Feb 2009 04:05:49
From: Travel
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
Those are options aren't they, you fucking idiot. You said the article
proposes nationalizing the banks.

Why don't you just STFU.

_________________________________________________________
Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
Visit www.pokermagazine.com


     
Date: 10 Feb 2009 02:54:01
From: RGP Loner
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
On Feb 10 2009 3:05 AM, Travel wrote:

> Those are options aren't they, you fucking idiot. You said the article
> proposes nationalizing the banks.
>
> Why don't you just STFU.
>

The article does propose Nationalization of the Banks as the
solution.....It says 1,we can't let them fail,
2, we also are unable to value the assets to buy the bad debt from the
banks, and so the solution proposed by this article is the
Nationalization of Banks.


"Seidman and others are calling for an alternative rescue plan that they
say would avoid the pitfalls of past efforts: a short-term nationalization
of the banks.

To many people, that very thought is an affront to the free-market system,
more Argentina than America. But that's exactly what the U.S. government
did in the S&L debacle of the 1980s."


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29084713

-------- 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com




      
Date: 10 Feb 2009 05:15:52
From: Travel
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
Your idiotic selective quoting is meaningless.

Bank of America says it can pay back bailout money in three years.
That's not nationalizing Bank Of America.

It's not an article about nationalizing the banks as a solution, you
dumb asshole.

_________________________________________________________
Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
Visit www.pokermagazine.com


       
Date: 10 Feb 2009 15:24:54
From: RGP Loner
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
On Feb 10 2009 4:15 AM, Travel wrote:

> Your idiotic selective quoting is meaningless.
>
> Bank of America says it can pay back bailout money in three years.
> That's not nationalizing Bank Of America.
>
> It's not an article about nationalizing the banks as a solution, you
> dumb asshole.
>


TeeHee You Didn't read the article , Did You?

It is THREE pages long, try again ...LOL

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29084713

--- 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com




        
Date: 11 Feb 2009 03:15:50
From: Travel
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
It's clear that you tried to read it, which explains your retarded
comments.

_________________________________________________________
Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
Visit www.pokermagazine.com


         
Date: 11 Feb 2009 02:06:27
From: RGP Loner
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
No your retarded.

----- 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com




          
Date: 11 Feb 2009 06:49:26
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout

"RGP Loner" <aaaa0db@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:3ika66xjpl.ln2@recgroups.com...
> No your retarded.
>
That would be, "you're" retarded. When you use "your" instead of "you are",
it makes you sound retarded.

Irish Mike





           
Date: 11 Feb 2009 04:07:30
From: RGP Loner
Subject: Re: Decent Overview Article On The Bank Bailout
On Feb 11 2009 4:49 AM, Irish Mike wrote:

> "RGP Loner" <aaaa0db@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:3ika66xjpl.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > No your retarded.
> >
> That would be, "you're" retarded. When you use "your" instead of "you are",
> it makes you sound retarded.
>
> Irish Mike


Yeah, I rely too much on spell checker and that makes me look retarded.
you post and that makes you look retarded.

------ 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com