pokerfied.com
Promoting poker discussions.

Main
Date: 13 Dec 2008 02:34:13
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
The fact that Barack Obama is a liar was established when he stood in front
of the camera and said that, in more than 20 years of sitting in the pews,
he had never heard Jeremiah Wright make a racist, anti-American or
anti-Semitic comment. And that was just one of the lies he has been caught
in.

Obama is a product of the totally corrupt Chicago Democrat political
machine. His whole political career was built and based on the lies and
corruption that are daily business-as-usual in Chicago. But the liberal
media ignored his corrupt background in Chicago politics through out the
presidential campaign. Now that a few real Chicago journalists have
reported this Senate-seat-for-sale scandal, every one is suddenly surprised
to find that Obama is involved in it up to his jug ears.

Obama said that he never discussed his vacant Senate seat with Blagojevich.
We know that's a lie because his own campaign manager (Axelrod) reported on
national TV that Obama had personal conversations with Blagojevich about
filling his vacant Senate seat. In addition, Obama's chief of staff, Rahn
Emanuel, had extensive conversations with Blagojevich to push Obama's desire
to have Valerie Jarrett get the seat. But Blagojevich was pissed because
Obama wouldn't pony up enough money. Regardless of any other involvement,
both Obama and Emanuel had a legal responsibility to immediately report this
whole seat-for-sale bribe scandal and didn't do it.

Now they are going to have a grand jury investigation, unless the Democrats
call stop it. If the Democrats fail in killing the investigation or at
least controlling the out come, my guess is Blagojevich and his assistant
will roll over on Rahn Emanuel and the other Democrat scum bags involved.
That includes the business men who were trying to raise a $1,000,000.00 in
bribes to have the vacant Senate seat go to Jesse Jackson Jr.

Needless to say, the liberal media is not going to investigate or report
Obama's involvement is this scandal. The question is, will the Democrats be
able to kill/control the grand jury investigation and protect Emanuel and
the rest of The Messiah's staff? My money is on The Messiah. Blagojevich
and Obama are both snakes but Obama is a big snake and Blagojevich is a
little snake. Look for the big snake to kill and eat the little snake.
Bye-bye Blagojevich.

Irish Mike

Very, very proud to be one of the 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote for
Obama.







 
Date: 13 Dec 2008 11:57:16
From: eldo77
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Dec 13 2008 2:34 AM, Irish Mike wrote:


>gibberish<

I don't see how you have any time to play poker. It seems all your time is
spent demonizing Democrats.

Keep trying. Maybe you'll finish driving yourself crazy.I feel your pain
and it makes me feel so good.


eldo77

______________________________________________________________________ 
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com



  
Date: 13 Dec 2008 20:10:15
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"eldo77" <ab26ec1@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:slgd16xv58.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Dec 13 2008 2:34 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
>
>
>>gibberish<
>
> I don't see how you have any time to play poker. It seems all your time is
> spent demonizing Democrats.

Well bucko, there are 55,000,000+ of we Americans who did not vote for your
Messiah.
But the ball's in your lunatic liberal left court now. You've got no place
to hide and no one else to blame any more for your fuck-ups. We've listened
to you liberals bitch, whine, criticize and complain about President Bush
for eight straight years - now it's our turn.

If we all had a dollar for every time we heard Obama promise "change" if he
was elected, we'd have enough money to bail out the auto makers our selves.
Well, let's see how that big change has gone so far:

1. Obama has appointed his cabinet. Every one of them is an old time, old
school Washington insider and most are hold-overs from the Clinton
administration of the 1990s. Except a couple who are from George Bush's
administration.

2. Obama, and his staff, are directly linked to a disgraceful political
corruption scandal involving the Democrat Goveneror of Illinois and the
attempted sale of Obama's Senate seat to the higherst bidder.

3. Obama is not going to pull all U.S. troops out of Iraq in 16 months as
promised.

4. The economy is in a shambles and he, and the Democrats, helped bring
about it's down fall with their entitlement-loans-to-buy-votes policies.

5. Jeremiah Wright is back in his church preaching the same racist,
anti-American, anti-Semitic hate mongering crap he did during the 20 years
Obama sat in the pews.

Sorry bucko, but it seems like "business as usual" to most of us.

Irish Mike





   
Date: 14 Dec 2008 09:12:05
From: Patrick Karl
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
Irish Mike wrote:
> "eldo77" <ab26ec1@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:slgd16xv58.ln2@recgroups.com...

> 5. Jeremiah Wright is back in his church preaching the same racist,
> anti-American, anti-Semitic hate mongering crap he did during the 20 years
> Obama sat in the pews.

But that's not very different than your very own behavior of continuing
to sit in those Catholic pews in the face of the buggering behavior of
your priests. Your criticism of Obama with regard to Jeremiah Wright is
a prime example of hypocriticism on your part. You really ought to give
that line of argument up.


    
Date: 14 Dec 2008 10:56:01
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"Patrick Karl" <jpkarl@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:gi37oa$91l$1@news.motzarella.org...
> Irish Mike wrote:
>> "eldo77" <ab26ec1@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:slgd16xv58.ln2@recgroups.com...
>
>> 5. Jeremiah Wright is back in his church preaching the same racist,
>> anti-American, anti-Semitic hate mongering crap he did during the 20
>> years Obama sat in the pews.
>
> But that's not very different than your very own behavior of continuing to
> sit in those Catholic pews in the face of the buggering behavior of your
> priests. Your criticism of Obama with regard to Jeremiah Wright is a
> prime example of hypocriticism on your part. You really ought to give
> that line of argument up.

Patrick, you are sick. You have a sexual obsession with young boys, you
truly need professional help but it's clear you will never seek it of your
own accord. I have contacted the police and gave them the screen name and
e-mail address you've been using on RGP. I am also putting you in my
kill-file. I hope, for your sake, that they follow up on the investigation
and that you are arrested.

Irish Mike




     
Date: 14 Dec 2008 10:47:30
From: Patrick Karl
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
Irish Mike wrote:
> "Patrick Karl" <jpkarl@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gi37oa$91l$1@news.motzarella.org...
>> Irish Mike wrote:
>>> "eldo77" <ab26ec1@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:slgd16xv58.ln2@recgroups.com...
>>> 5. Jeremiah Wright is back in his church preaching the same racist,
>>> anti-American, anti-Semitic hate mongering crap he did during the 20
>>> years Obama sat in the pews.
>> But that's not very different than your very own behavior of continuing to
>> sit in those Catholic pews in the face of the buggering behavior of your
>> priests. Your criticism of Obama with regard to Jeremiah Wright is a
>> prime example of hypocriticism on your part. You really ought to give
>> that line of argument up.
>
> Patrick, you are sick. You have a sexual obsession with young boys, you
> truly need professional help but it's clear you will never seek it of your
> own accord. I have contacted the police and gave them the screen name and
> e-mail address you've been using on RGP. I am also putting you in my
> kill-file. I hope, for your sake, that they follow up on the investigation
> and that you are arrested.

Irish Mike, you are thick. My only obsession is with hypocrits such as
yourself, castigating Obama for behavior which is mild in comparison
with yours in blithely ignoring the buggering which a large percentage
of your Catholics priests have been engaged in for the last 50 years
(probably forever, actually, or at least since the middle ages when the
concept of a celibate priesthood arose).


      
Date: 14 Dec 2008 12:12:11
From: bub
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:47:30 -0600, Patrick Karl <jpkarl@gmail.com >
wrote:

>which is mild in comparison
>with yours in blithely ignoring the buggering which a large percentage
>of your Catholics priests have been engaged in

of course you know that the percentage of pedophiles in the catholic
church is the same percentage of pedophiles in the total population

same percentage ,but of course you knew that


       
Date: 14 Dec 2008 13:06:04
From: Patrick Karl
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
bub wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:47:30 -0600, Patrick Karl <jpkarl@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> which is mild in comparison
>> with yours in blithely ignoring the buggering which a large percentage
>> of your Catholics priests have been engaged in
>
> of course you know that the percentage of pedophiles in the catholic
> church is the same percentage of pedophiles in the total population
>
> same percentage ,but of course you knew that

Actually, I did not know that. Do you provide cites with your
off-the-wall declarations?

The information I've seen indicates that the rate of pedophilia in the
general population is unknown, for various reasons.

Don't you think that priests should be held to a higher standard than
the general population?


        
Date: 14 Dec 2008 20:32:33
From: bub
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:06:04 -0600, Patrick Karl <jpkarl@gmail.com >
>
>Actually, I did not know that. Do you provide cites with your
>off-the-wall declarations?
yeah ,here is some off-the-wall stuff for you

" Pedophilia (the sexual abuse of a prepubescent child) among priests
is extremely rare, affecting only 0.3% of the entire population of
clergy. The vast majority of the clerical sex-abuse scandals now
coming to light do not involve pedophilia. Rather, they involve
ephebophilia homosexual attraction to adolescent boys. While the
total number of sexual abusers in the priesthood is much higher than
those guilty of pedophilia, it still amounts to less than 2 percent
comparable to the rate among married men"
Philip Jenkins, professor of history and religious studies at
Pennsylvania State University, author of Pedophiles and Priests:
Anatomy of a Contemporary Crisis

"Four percent of the population suffers from sexual orientation toward
children"
http://www.registeredoffenderslist.org/what-is-pedophilia.htm


>Don't you think that priests should be held to a higher standard than
>the general population?

why would i care what standards are held for them? i'm not catholic.
that would be up to the people who follow/listen to them to decide if
priests should be held to higher standards
i ,myself, think all child molesters should be put in prison general
population with the stipulation everyone knows they are child
molesters.


         
Date: 15 Dec 2008 02:54:40
From: garycarson
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Dec 14 2008 9:32 PM, bub wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:06:04 -0600, Patrick Karl <jpkarl@gmail.com>
> >
> >Actually, I did not know that. Do you provide cites with your
> >off-the-wall declarations?
> yeah ,here is some off-the-wall stuff for you
>
> " Pedophilia (the sexual abuse of a prepubescent child) among priests
> is extremely rare, affecting only 0.3% of the entire population of
> clergy. The vast majority of the clerical sex-abuse scandals now
> coming to light do not involve pedophilia. Rather, they involve
> ephebophilia homosexual attraction to adolescent boys. While the
> total number of sexual abusers in the priesthood is much higher than
> those guilty of pedophilia, it still amounts to less than 2 percent
> comparable to the rate among married men"
> Philip Jenkins, professor of history and religious studies at
> Pennsylvania State University, author of Pedophiles and Priests:
> Anatomy of a Contemporary Crisis

Of upi jave a quibble with his use of the word pedophile then you should
have just said that rather than trying to be obscure.

>
> "Four percent of the population suffers from sexual orientation toward
> children"
> http://www.registeredoffenderslist.org/what-is-pedophilia.htm

Registered sex offender lists include 18 year olds who had sex with 17
year olds.

Your trying to compare priests to the general population for a very
narrow, technical defintion of the word then comparing priests to a the
general population for a very wide definition of the word when applied to
general population and a normal usage when applied to priests.

Basically you're just trying to present a cute attempt at a childish
sematics trick.

____________________________________________________________________ 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com




          
Date: 16 Dec 2008 01:53:28
From: bub
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:54:40 -0800, "garycarson"
<garycarson@alumni.northwestern.edu > wrote:

>Of upi jave a quibble


ohhh ,ok ..now i understand


        
Date: 14 Dec 2008 16:18:47
From: garycarson
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Dec 14 2008 2:06 PM, Patrick Karl wrote:

> bub wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:47:30 -0600, Patrick Karl <jpkarl@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> which is mild in comparison
> >> with yours in blithely ignoring the buggering which a large percentage
> >> of your Catholics priests have been engaged in
> >
> > of course you know that the percentage of pedophiles in the catholic
> > church is the same percentage of pedophiles in the total population
> >
> > same percentage ,but of course you knew that
>
> Actually, I did not know that. Do you provide cites with your
> off-the-wall declarations?
>
> The information I've seen indicates that the rate of pedophilia in the
> general population is unknown, for various reasons.
>
> Don't you think that priests should be held to a higher standard than
> the general population?

No, I don't think they should. The same standard would be good though.

The problem with priests isn't that some have been fucking children, it's
that the priests who weren't doing it knew about the ones who were and
actively covered it up.

Then when those catholic pew sitters found out they just yawned.

They're all scum. That kind of behavior isn't at all the norm in the
general population.

________________________________________________________________________ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com



        
Date: 14 Dec 2008 16:25:01
From: da pickle
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
"Patrick Karl"

> The information I've seen indicates that the rate of pedophilia in the
> general population is unknown, for various reasons.

And yet you quote it?




         
Date: 14 Dec 2008 18:00:53
From: Patrick Karl
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
da pickle wrote:
> "Patrick Karl"
>
>> The information I've seen indicates that the rate of pedophilia in the
>> general population is unknown, for various reasons.
>
> And yet you quote it?

Where?


      
Date: 14 Dec 2008 11:26:42
From: da pickle
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
"Patrick Karl"

> Irish Mike, you are thick. My only obsession is with hypocrits such as
> yourself, castigating Obama for behavior which is mild in comparison with
> yours in blithely ignoring the buggering which a large percentage of your
> Catholics priests have been engaged in for the last 50 years (probably
> forever, actually, or at least since the middle ages when the concept of a
> celibate priesthood arose).

You know little about the catholic church, Patrick ... you know little about
priests and you know little about the "concept of a celibate priesthood."
You must be very young or at the least poorly educated. Educate yourself a
little more before you continue to prove your innocence.




       
Date: 14 Dec 2008 12:48:00
From: Patrick Karl
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
da pickle wrote:
> "Patrick Karl"
>
>> Irish Mike, you are thick. My only obsession is with hypocrits such as
>> yourself, castigating Obama for behavior which is mild in comparison with
>> yours in blithely ignoring the buggering which a large percentage of your
>> Catholics priests have been engaged in for the last 50 years (probably
>> forever, actually, or at least since the middle ages when the concept of a
>> celibate priesthood arose).
>
> You know little about the catholic church, Patrick ... you know little about
> priests and you know little about the "concept of a celibate priesthood."
> You must be very young or at the least poorly educated. Educate yourself a
> little more before you continue to prove your innocence.

You carrying Irish Mike's water these days?

I've served as an altar boy in a Solemn High Mass. I believe the Solemn
High Mass has become obsolete with the fall of the Tridentine Mass. So
this ought to eliminate at least the "very young" part of your very weak
ad hominem argument.

But, in any case, I put the part about the middle ages in parentheses
because it was not an essential part of what I was saying, namely:

* buggering an innocent boy by a consecrated priest is much worse
that throwing off a comment judged by some to be racist.

* the rate of buggery among the American Catholic clergy is around
4%, or some 40 times the rate postulated by Irish Mike, making him the
one who knows "...little about priests".

* the seriousness of this buggery on the part of American Catholic
priests is such that dioceses are declaring bankruptcy as a result of
civil lawsuits.

It is agreed by many that the "concept of a celibate priesthood" (well,
actually, the existence of a celibate priesthood) is responsible for
attracting the kind of men to the priesthood who are inclined to engage
in buggery of innocent young boys. There is room for a lot of debate
about exactly when the celibate priesthood arose.

For Irish Mike to continue to press the issue of Obama's church
attendence in the face of these facts is the height of hypocrisy.


        
Date: 14 Dec 2008 16:24:09
From: da pickle
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
"Patrick Karl"

> I've served as an altar boy in a Solemn High Mass. I believe the Solemn
> High Mass has become obsolete with the fall of the Tridentine Mass. So
> this ought to eliminate at least the "very young" part of your very weak
> ad hominem argument.
>
> But, in any case, I put the part about the middle ages in parentheses
> because it was not an essential part of what I was saying, namely

If not a child in age, a child in thought.




         
Date: 14 Dec 2008 18:02:13
From: Patrick Karl
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
da pickle wrote:
> "Patrick Karl"
>
>> I've served as an altar boy in a Solemn High Mass. I believe the Solemn
>> High Mass has become obsolete with the fall of the Tridentine Mass. So
>> this ought to eliminate at least the "very young" part of your very weak
>> ad hominem argument.
>>
>> But, in any case, I put the part about the middle ages in parentheses
>> because it was not an essential part of what I was saying, namely
>
> If not a child in age, a child in thought.
>
>
You're just being silly now.


   
Date: 13 Dec 2008 19:26:23
From: eldo77
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Dec 13 2008 8:10 PM, Irish Mike wrote:

> "eldo77" <ab26ec1@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:slgd16xv58.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > On Dec 13 2008 2:34 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
> >
> >
> >>gibberish<
> >
> > I don't see how you have any time to play poker. It seems all your time is
> > spent demonizing Democrats.
>
> Well bucko, there are 55,000,000+ of we Americans who did not vote for your
> Messiah.

Well Fucko,I know. I'm one of them.

> But the ball's in your lunatic liberal left court now. You've got no place
> to hide and no one else to blame any more for your fuck-ups. We've listened
> to you liberals bitch, whine, criticize and complain about President Bush
> for eight straight years - now it's our turn.

You mean you didn't care that he was ruining the country?
>
> If we all had a dollar for every time we heard Obama promise "change" if he
> was elected, we'd have enough money to bail out the auto makers our selves.
> Well, let's see how that big change has gone so far:

Are you so dense you haven't noticed he hasn't served one day in office
yet?

>
> 1. Obama has appointed his cabinet. Every one of them is an old time, old
> school Washington insider and most are hold-overs from the Clinton
> administration of the 1990s. Except a couple who are from George Bush's
> administration.

Your attempted Clinton smear won't work.Because it can't be a smear. We
were in great shape when Clinton was in office. I don't give one fuck that
he got his dick sucked.

>
> 2. Obama, and his staff, are directly linked to a disgraceful political
> corruption scandal involving the Democrat Goveneror of Illinois and the
> attempted sale of Obama's Senate seat to the higherst bidder.

This is a bald face lie but I'm not surprised.
>
> 3. Obama is not going to pull all U.S. troops out of Iraq in 16 months as
> promised.

I didn't think you wanted him to.
>
> 4. The economy is in a shambles and he, and the Democrats, helped bring
> about it's down fall with their entitlement-loans-to-buy-votes policies.

Bush has been in office 8 years and the economy is in shambles. HELLO!!
>
> 5. Jeremiah Wright is back in his church preaching the same racist,
> anti-American, anti-Semitic hate mongering crap he did during the 20 years
> Obama sat in the pews.

I don't give a shit what some nigger in Chicago preaches.
>
> Sorry bucko, but it seems like "business as usual" to most of us.
>
> Irish Mike

BTW, I know about this "bucko" shit. Most people on here don't know it's a
derogatory term you use to insult or put people down.I would like to
respond in kind, but I can't think of a term low enough to insult you.

eldo77

________________________________________________________________________ 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com




    
Date: 14 Dec 2008 07:05:34
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"eldo77" <ab26ec1@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:vvae16xkab.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Dec 13 2008 8:10 PM, Irish Mike wrote:
>
>> "eldo77" <ab26ec1@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:slgd16xv58.ln2@recgroups.com...
>> > On Dec 13 2008 2:34 AM, Irish Mike wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>gibberish<
>> >
>> > I don't see how you have any time to play poker. It seems all your time
>> > is
>> > spent demonizing Democrats.
>>
>> Well bucko, there are 55,000,000+ of we Americans who did not vote for
>> your
>> Messiah.
>
> Well Fucko,I know. I'm one of them.
>
>> But the ball's in your lunatic liberal left court now. You've got no
>> place
>> to hide and no one else to blame any more for your fuck-ups. We've
>> listened
>> to you liberals bitch, whine, criticize and complain about President Bush
>> for eight straight years - now it's our turn.
>
> You mean you didn't care that he was ruining the country?
>>
>> If we all had a dollar for every time we heard Obama promise "change" if
>> he
>> was elected, we'd have enough money to bail out the auto makers our
>> selves.
>> Well, let's see how that big change has gone so far:
>
> Are you so dense you haven't noticed he hasn't served one day in office
> yet?
>
>>
>> 1. Obama has appointed his cabinet. Every one of them is an old time,
>> old
>> school Washington insider and most are hold-overs from the Clinton
>> administration of the 1990s. Except a couple who are from George Bush's
>> administration.
>
> Your attempted Clinton smear won't work.Because it can't be a smear. We
> were in great shape when Clinton was in office. I don't give one fuck that
> he got his dick sucked.
>
>>
>> 2. Obama, and his staff, are directly linked to a disgraceful political
>> corruption scandal involving the Democrat Goveneror of Illinois and the
>> attempted sale of Obama's Senate seat to the higherst bidder.
>
> This is a bald face lie but I'm not surprised.
>>
>> 3. Obama is not going to pull all U.S. troops out of Iraq in 16 months as
>> promised.
>
> I didn't think you wanted him to.
>>
>> 4. The economy is in a shambles and he, and the Democrats, helped bring
>> about it's down fall with their entitlement-loans-to-buy-votes policies.
>
> Bush has been in office 8 years and the economy is in shambles. HELLO!!
>>
>> 5. Jeremiah Wright is back in his church preaching the same racist,
>> anti-American, anti-Semitic hate mongering crap he did during the 20
>> years
>> Obama sat in the pews.
>
> I don't give a shit what some nigger in Chicago preaches.
>>
>> Sorry bucko, but it seems like "business as usual" to most of us.
>>
>> Irish Mike
>
> BTW, I know about this "bucko" shit. Most people on here don't know it's a
> derogatory term you use to insult or put people down.I would like to
> respond in kind, but I can't think of a term low enough to insult you.
>
> eldo77

(snip eldo77's lame response that ignored the facts)

BTW eldo, any insult from being called "bucko" exists only in your tiny
little mind - bucko.

Irish Mike





 
Date: 13 Dec 2008 09:33:01
From: Bob T.
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
On Dec 12, 11:34=A0pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
> The fact that Barack Obama is a liar was established when he stood in fro=
nt
> of the camera and said that, in more than 20 years of sitting in the pews=
,
> he had never heard Jeremiah Wright make a racist, anti-American or
> anti-Semitic comment. =A0And that was just one of the lies he has been ca=
ught
> in.
>
> Obama is a product of the totally corrupt Chicago Democrat political
> machine. =A0His whole political career was built and based on the lies an=
d
> corruption that are daily business-as-usual in Chicago. =A0But the libera=
l
> media ignored his corrupt background in Chicago politics through out the
> presidential campaign. =A0Now that a few real Chicago journalists have
> reported this Senate-seat-for-sale scandal, every one is suddenly surpris=
ed
> to find that Obama is involved in it up to his jug ears.
>
> Obama said that he never discussed his vacant Senate seat with Blagojevic=
h.
> We know that's a lie because his own campaign manager (Axelrod) reported =
on
> national TV that Obama had personal conversations with Blagojevich about
> filling his vacant Senate seat. =A0In addition, Obama's chief of staff, R=
ahn
> Emanuel, had extensive conversations with Blagojevich to push Obama's des=
ire
> to have Valerie Jarrett get the seat. =A0But Blagojevich was pissed becau=
se
> Obama wouldn't pony up enough money. =A0Regardless of any other involveme=
nt,
> both Obama and Emanuel had a legal responsibility to immediately report t=
his
> whole seat-for-sale bribe scandal and didn't do it.
>
> Now they are going to have a grand jury investigation, unless the Democra=
ts
> call stop it. =A0If the Democrats fail in killing the investigation or at
> least controlling the out come, my guess is Blagojevich and his assistant
> will roll over on Rahn Emanuel and the other Democrat scum bags involved.
> That includes the business men who were trying to raise a =A0$1,000,000.0=
0 in
> bribes to have the vacant Senate seat go to Jesse Jackson Jr.
>
> Needless to say, the liberal media is not going to investigate or report
> Obama's involvement is this scandal. =A0The question is, will the Democra=
ts be
> able to kill/control the grand jury investigation and protect Emanuel and
> the rest of The Messiah's staff? =A0My money is on The Messiah. =A0Blagoj=
evich
> and Obama are both snakes but Obama is a big snake and Blagojevich is a
> little snake. =A0Look for the big snake to kill and eat the little snake.
> Bye-bye Blagojevich.
>
> Irish Mike
>
> Very, very proud to be one of the 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote =
for
> Obama.

Nothing would make Mike happier than to have a big scandal derail the
Obama presidency and throw the nation into chaos. He would be so
proud!

- Bob T.


  
Date: 13 Dec 2008 19:46:33
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"Bob T." <bob@synapse-cs.com > wrote in message
news:590a04ac-7afd-4b70-8f1a-8cd821e25237@p2g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 11:34 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
> The fact that Barack Obama is a liar was established when he stood in
> front
> of the camera and said that, in more than 20 years of sitting in the pews,
> he had never heard Jeremiah Wright make a racist, anti-American or
> anti-Semitic comment. And that was just one of the lies he has been caught
> in.
>
> Obama is a product of the totally corrupt Chicago Democrat political
> machine. His whole political career was built and based on the lies and
> corruption that are daily business-as-usual in Chicago. But the liberal
> media ignored his corrupt background in Chicago politics through out the
> presidential campaign. Now that a few real Chicago journalists have
> reported this Senate-seat-for-sale scandal, every one is suddenly
> surprised
> to find that Obama is involved in it up to his jug ears.
>
> Obama said that he never discussed his vacant Senate seat with
> Blagojevich.
> We know that's a lie because his own campaign manager (Axelrod) reported
> on
> national TV that Obama had personal conversations with Blagojevich about
> filling his vacant Senate seat. In addition, Obama's chief of staff, Rahn
> Emanuel, had extensive conversations with Blagojevich to push Obama's
> desire
> to have Valerie Jarrett get the seat. But Blagojevich was pissed because
> Obama wouldn't pony up enough money. Regardless of any other involvement,
> both Obama and Emanuel had a legal responsibility to immediately report
> this
> whole seat-for-sale bribe scandal and didn't do it.
>
> Now they are going to have a grand jury investigation, unless the
> Democrats
> call stop it. If the Democrats fail in killing the investigation or at
> least controlling the out come, my guess is Blagojevich and his assistant
> will roll over on Rahn Emanuel and the other Democrat scum bags involved.
> That includes the business men who were trying to raise a $1,000,000.00 in
> bribes to have the vacant Senate seat go to Jesse Jackson Jr.
>
> Needless to say, the liberal media is not going to investigate or report
> Obama's involvement is this scandal. The question is, will the Democrats
> be
> able to kill/control the grand jury investigation and protect Emanuel and
> the rest of The Messiah's staff? My money is on The Messiah. Blagojevich
> and Obama are both snakes but Obama is a big snake and Blagojevich is a
> little snake. Look for the big snake to kill and eat the little snake.
> Bye-bye Blagojevich.
>
> Irish Mike
>
> Very, very proud to be one of the 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote
> for
> Obama.

Nothing would make Mike happier than to have a big scandal derail the
Obama presidency and throw the nation into chaos. He would be so
proud!

- Bob T.

Not nearly as proud as Bob would have been if the surge had failed and there
had been another terrorist attack on
American soil during President Bush's term in office.

Irish Mike




 
Date: 13 Dec 2008 08:17:49
From: DannyOcean
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
Mike........who are your heroes??

"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:2AJ0l.13956$Ws1.1033@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
> The fact that Barack Obama is a liar was established when he stood in
> front of the camera and said that, in more than 20 years of sitting in the
> pews, he had never heard Jeremiah Wright make a racist, anti-American or
> anti-Semitic comment. And that was just one of the lies he has been
> caught in.
>
> Obama is a product of the totally corrupt Chicago Democrat political
> machine. His whole political career was built and based on the lies and
> corruption that are daily business-as-usual in Chicago. But the liberal
> media ignored his corrupt background in Chicago politics through out the
> presidential campaign. Now that a few real Chicago journalists have
> reported this Senate-seat-for-sale scandal, every one is suddenly
> surprised to find that Obama is involved in it up to his jug ears.
>
> Obama said that he never discussed his vacant Senate seat with
> Blagojevich. We know that's a lie because his own campaign manager
> (Axelrod) reported on national TV that Obama had personal conversations
> with Blagojevich about filling his vacant Senate seat. In addition,
> Obama's chief of staff, Rahn Emanuel, had extensive conversations with
> Blagojevich to push Obama's desire to have Valerie Jarrett get the seat.
> But Blagojevich was pissed because Obama wouldn't pony up enough money.
> Regardless of any other involvement, both Obama and Emanuel had a legal
> responsibility to immediately report this whole seat-for-sale bribe
> scandal and didn't do it.
>
> Now they are going to have a grand jury investigation, unless the
> Democrats call stop it. If the Democrats fail in killing the
> investigation or at least controlling the out come, my guess is
> Blagojevich and his assistant will roll over on Rahn Emanuel and the other
> Democrat scum bags involved. That includes the business men who were
> trying to raise a $1,000,000.00 in bribes to have the vacant Senate seat
> go to Jesse Jackson Jr.
>
> Needless to say, the liberal media is not going to investigate or report
> Obama's involvement is this scandal. The question is, will the Democrats
> be able to kill/control the grand jury investigation and protect Emanuel
> and the rest of The Messiah's staff? My money is on The Messiah.
> Blagojevich and Obama are both snakes but Obama is a big snake and
> Blagojevich is a little snake. Look for the big snake to kill and eat the
> little snake. Bye-bye Blagojevich.
>
> Irish Mike
>
> Very, very proud to be one of the 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote
> for Obama.
>
>
>




  
Date: 13 Dec 2008 19:42:53
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"DannyOcean" <vicvega47@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:VeR0l.58686$zQ3.26362@newsfe12.iad...
> Mike........who are your heroes??

The 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote for Obama.

Irish Mike


>
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:2AJ0l.13956$Ws1.1033@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> The fact that Barack Obama is a liar was established when he stood in
>> front of the camera and said that, in more than 20 years of sitting in
>> the pews, he had never heard Jeremiah Wright make a racist, anti-American
>> or anti-Semitic comment. And that was just one of the lies he has been
>> caught in.
>>
>> Obama is a product of the totally corrupt Chicago Democrat political
>> machine. His whole political career was built and based on the lies and
>> corruption that are daily business-as-usual in Chicago. But the liberal
>> media ignored his corrupt background in Chicago politics through out the
>> presidential campaign. Now that a few real Chicago journalists have
>> reported this Senate-seat-for-sale scandal, every one is suddenly
>> surprised to find that Obama is involved in it up to his jug ears.
>>
>> Obama said that he never discussed his vacant Senate seat with
>> Blagojevich. We know that's a lie because his own campaign manager
>> (Axelrod) reported on national TV that Obama had personal conversations
>> with Blagojevich about filling his vacant Senate seat. In addition,
>> Obama's chief of staff, Rahn Emanuel, had extensive conversations with
>> Blagojevich to push Obama's desire to have Valerie Jarrett get the seat.
>> But Blagojevich was pissed because Obama wouldn't pony up enough money.
>> Regardless of any other involvement, both Obama and Emanuel had a legal
>> responsibility to immediately report this whole seat-for-sale bribe
>> scandal and didn't do it.
>>
>> Now they are going to have a grand jury investigation, unless the
>> Democrats call stop it. If the Democrats fail in killing the
>> investigation or at least controlling the out come, my guess is
>> Blagojevich and his assistant will roll over on Rahn Emanuel and the
>> other Democrat scum bags involved. That includes the business men who
>> were trying to raise a $1,000,000.00 in bribes to have the vacant Senate
>> seat go to Jesse Jackson Jr.
>>
>> Needless to say, the liberal media is not going to investigate or report
>> Obama's involvement is this scandal. The question is, will the Democrats
>> be able to kill/control the grand jury investigation and protect Emanuel
>> and the rest of The Messiah's staff? My money is on The Messiah.
>> Blagojevich and Obama are both snakes but Obama is a big snake and
>> Blagojevich is a little snake. Look for the big snake to kill and eat
>> the little snake. Bye-bye Blagojevich.
>>
>> Irish Mike
>>
>> Very, very proud to be one of the 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote
>> for Obama.
>>
>>
>>
>
>




   
Date: 13 Dec 2008 19:54:15
From: James L. Hankins
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:kEY0l.10046$c45.2099@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> "DannyOcean" <vicvega47@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:VeR0l.58686$zQ3.26362@newsfe12.iad...
>> Mike........who are your heroes??
>
> The 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote for Obama.
>
> Irish Mike



Gee, Danny, you served that one up nicely.




    
Date: 13 Dec 2008 20:02:29
From: mccard
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"James L. Hankins" <jhankins5@cox.net > wrote in message
news:cHZ0l.2961$cL7.1564@newsfe22.iad...
>
> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
> news:kEY0l.10046$c45.2099@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>
>> "DannyOcean" <vicvega47@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:VeR0l.58686$zQ3.26362@newsfe12.iad...
>>> Mike........who are your heroes??
>>
>> The 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote for Obama.
>>
>> Irish Mike
>
> Gee, Danny, you served that one up nicely.
>
Don't think Mike is going to take Colin Powell's advice and stop shouting
right wing propaganda at everyone, do you?



     
Date: 14 Dec 2008 07:09:51
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?

"mccard" <no_won@no_won.none > wrote in message
news:ePZ0l.11983$uS1.4336@newsfe19.iad...
>
> "James L. Hankins" <jhankins5@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:cHZ0l.2961$cL7.1564@newsfe22.iad...
>>
>> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
>> news:kEY0l.10046$c45.2099@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>
>>> "DannyOcean" <vicvega47@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:VeR0l.58686$zQ3.26362@newsfe12.iad...
>>>> Mike........who are your heroes??
>>>
>>> The 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote for Obama.
>>>
>>> Irish Mike
>>
>> Gee, Danny, you served that one up nicely.
>>
> Don't think Mike is going to take Colin Powell's advice and stop shouting
> right wing propaganda at everyone, do you?

Maybe that's because Colin Powell wasn't one of the 55,000,000+ Americans
who did not vote for Obama.
Besides, we've listened to liberals shout left wing propaganda for eight
straight years. Seems only fair we should have a turn at bat.

Irish Mike




      
Date: 15 Dec 2008 17:53:36
From: Kyle T. Jones
Subject: Re: Will the liberal media be able to cover up Obama scandal?
Irish Mike, my dear, dear friend, there was this time, oh, 12/14/2008
6:09 AM or thereabouts, when you let the following craziness loose on
Usenet:
> "mccard" <no_won@no_won.none> wrote in message
> news:ePZ0l.11983$uS1.4336@newsfe19.iad...
>> "James L. Hankins" <jhankins5@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:cHZ0l.2961$cL7.1564@newsfe22.iad...
>>> "Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net> wrote in message
>>> news:kEY0l.10046$c45.2099@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>> "DannyOcean" <vicvega47@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:VeR0l.58686$zQ3.26362@newsfe12.iad...
>>>>> Mike........who are your heroes??
>>>> The 55,000,000+ Americans who did not vote for Obama.
>>>>
>>>> Irish Mike
>>> Gee, Danny, you served that one up nicely.
>>>
>> Don't think Mike is going to take Colin Powell's advice and stop shouting
>> right wing propaganda at everyone, do you?
>
> Maybe that's because Colin Powell wasn't one of the 55,000,000+ Americans
> who did not vote for Obama.
> Besides, we've listened to liberals shout left wing propaganda for eight
> straight years. Seems only fair we should have a turn at bat.
>
> Irish Mike
>
>

Cripes, man, y'all impeached a dewd for lying about getting a damn BJ!
(you realize his *wife* was listening, right)?

I thought you *had* your turn!

Round and round.

Cheers.