| |
Main
Date: 20 Jan 2009 12:36:36
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
I can't wait to hear what his testimony will be when the prosecutor
starts questioning him about 9-11.
Bush in classroom on 9/11 with his commentary!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlgTE3y3MNc
On 9/11, Bush watched the first plane impact
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U&feature=PlayList&p=A6431C0DFB2EFD5C&playnext=1&index=15
Prosecutor: Mr. Bush, on several occasions you have said that you saw
the first plane hit the WTC. Could you tell us the time and place you
witnessed this event on television?
Defense: I object your honor.
Judge: Objection over ruled.
Prosecutor: You can answer the question Mr. Bush.
Bush: I see you have been watching all of my youtube videos. (Bush
chuckles).
Courtroom: Laughter erupts and the lady in the back stands up and
says, "Just admit your guilty Mr. Bush."
Judge: Will someone Taze that fuckin' bitch in the back and get her
out of here. Thank you.
Bush: This is so cool. (Bush chuckles). Now watch this drive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3p9y_OEAdc
|
|
| |
Date: 26 Jan 2009 08:14:39
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 25, 3:53=A0pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
> "Senator Millionaire" <moon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0c93f0ce-f025-4711-97eb-9ab4f2fa6270@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 23, 5:00 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
>
> > Sorry to disappoint you bucko. But the idea that America created the 9/=
11
> > terrorist attacks as part of some dark, evil political plot is absurd. =
And
> > those two and a half sentences is about all that theory is worth.
>
> > Irish Mike
>
> What's absurd Irish Mike is YOU taking the 'official' version of the
> 9-11 commission at face value and leaving it at that. And remember,
> initially Bush was against any type of commission investigating
> 9-11!
>
> The former FBI director, Louis Freeh, wrote an article published in
> the Wall Street Journal titled:
>
> An Incomplete Investigation -- Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore
> "Able Danger"?
>
> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=3D110007559
>
> So now you disagree with the former FBI director? YOU are a
> disinformation shill and a complete fuckin' moron. How much are they
> paying you Irish Mike?
>
> OK, you got me bukco. =A0I confess. =A0The government secretly pays me $1=
12.67 a
> week for being a "disinformation shill" on a poker newsgroup. =A0Plus, I =
get
> 5% of all the money they make selling tin foil hats to conspiracy nuts. =
=A0So
> far, I'm making more on tin foil. =A0As a point of curiosity, what are yo=
u
> guys who suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome going to do now that he's
> gone? =A0I mean, given that The Messiah is strictly off limits, what will=
you
> do?
>
> Irish Mike
>
> I can see you're still having trouble answering the two simple
> questions I asked you.
It looks to me like YOU are the one suffering from 'Bush Derangement
Syndrome'. You probably voted for him twice and look what your vote
did! The National Debt is almost $11 trillion dollars and counting and
the economy is a disaster. And you're still licking Bush ass? You
really need to get your head examined!
|
| | |
Date: 26 Jan 2009 12:17:57
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:26912d51-5daf-4ec4-acdb-0afdcb99bf37@s36g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 25, 3:53 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
> "Senator Millionaire" <moon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0c93f0ce-f025-4711-97eb-9ab4f2fa6270@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 23, 5:00 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
>
> > Sorry to disappoint you bucko. But the idea that America created the
> > 9/11
> > terrorist attacks as part of some dark, evil political plot is absurd.
> > And
> > those two and a half sentences is about all that theory is worth.
>
> > Irish Mike
>
> What's absurd Irish Mike is YOU taking the 'official' version of the
> 9-11 commission at face value and leaving it at that. And remember,
> initially Bush was against any type of commission investigating
> 9-11!
>
> The former FBI director, Louis Freeh, wrote an article published in
> the Wall Street Journal titled:
>
> An Incomplete Investigation -- Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore
> "Able Danger"?
>
> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007559
>
> So now you disagree with the former FBI director? YOU are a
> disinformation shill and a complete fuckin' moron. How much are they
> paying you Irish Mike?
>
> OK, you got me bukco. I confess. The government secretly pays me $112.67 a
> week for being a "disinformation shill" on a poker newsgroup. Plus, I get
> 5% of all the money they make selling tin foil hats to conspiracy nuts. So
> far, I'm making more on tin foil. As a point of curiosity, what are you
> guys who suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome going to do now that he's
> gone? I mean, given that The Messiah is strictly off limits, what will you
> do?
>
> Irish Mike
>
> I can see you're still having trouble answering the two simple
> questions I asked you.
"It looks to me like YOU are the one suffering from 'Bush Derangement
Syndrome'. You probably voted for him twice and look what your vote
did! The National Debt is almost $11 trillion dollars and counting and
the economy is a disaster. And you're still licking Bush ass? You
really need to get your head examined!"
I did vote for Bush twice because I thought the Democrats would be worse.
We have not had a terrorist attack on American soil in seven and a half
years. The national debt is terrible and your Messiah is about to make it
twice as bad. His phony stimulus plan in really just a thinly disguised
well fare, give away, entitlement program to buy votes. Many of the people
who get this Obama handout, pay zero income taxes. The financial disaster
started because Democrats, including your Messiah, pressured banks in to
making high risk mortgage loans to people who wouldn't have qualified for a
pup tent under the former bank lending standards. Next time you talk with
your Messiah you might want to tell him that you can't spend your way out of
a recession by taking money from tax payers and using it to grow the
government.
Irish Mike
|
| | | |
Date: 26 Jan 2009 20:32:42
From: Dave
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Irish Mike wrote:
> "Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:26912d51-5daf-4ec4-acdb-0afdcb99bf37@s36g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 25, 3:53 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>> "Senator Millionaire" <moon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:0c93f0ce-f025-4711-97eb-9ab4f2fa6270@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 23, 5:00 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
>>> Sorry to disappoint you bucko. But the idea that America created the
>>> 9/11
>>> terrorist attacks as part of some dark, evil political plot is absurd.
>>> And
>>> those two and a half sentences is about all that theory is worth.
>>> Irish Mike
>> What's absurd Irish Mike is YOU taking the 'official' version of the
>> 9-11 commission at face value and leaving it at that. And remember,
>> initially Bush was against any type of commission investigating
>> 9-11!
>>
>> The former FBI director, Louis Freeh, wrote an article published in
>> the Wall Street Journal titled:
>>
>> An Incomplete Investigation -- Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore
>> "Able Danger"?
>>
>> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007559
>>
>> So now you disagree with the former FBI director? YOU are a
>> disinformation shill and a complete fuckin' moron. How much are they
>> paying you Irish Mike?
>>
>> OK, you got me bukco. I confess. The government secretly pays me $112.67 a
>> week for being a "disinformation shill" on a poker newsgroup. Plus, I get
>> 5% of all the money they make selling tin foil hats to conspiracy nuts. So
>> far, I'm making more on tin foil. As a point of curiosity, what are you
>> guys who suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome going to do now that he's
>> gone? I mean, given that The Messiah is strictly off limits, what will you
>> do?
>>
>> Irish Mike
>>
>> I can see you're still having trouble answering the two simple
>> questions I asked you.
>
> "It looks to me like YOU are the one suffering from 'Bush Derangement
> Syndrome'. You probably voted for him twice and look what your vote
> did! The National Debt is almost $11 trillion dollars and counting and
> the economy is a disaster. And you're still licking Bush ass? You
> really need to get your head examined!"
>
> I did vote for Bush twice because I thought the Democrats would be worse.
> We have not had a terrorist attack on American soil in seven and a half
> years. The national debt is terrible and your Messiah is about to make it
> twice as bad. His phony stimulus plan in really just a thinly disguised
> well fare, give away, entitlement program to buy votes. Many of the people
> who get this Obama handout, pay zero income taxes. The financial disaster
> started because Democrats, including your Messiah, pressured banks in to
> making high risk mortgage loans to people who wouldn't have qualified for a
> pup tent under the former bank lending standards. Next time you talk with
> your Messiah you might want to tell him that you can't spend your way out of
> a recession by taking money from tax payers and using it to grow the
> government.
>
> Irish Mike
>
>
Mike,
The information about Bush is fact. What your spouting is fiction
created in your little mind.
You/we don't have a clue about whats going to go on in the future, but
we absolutely do know what has happened in the past.
You voted for a known which was proven to be wrong in pretty much all he
did, it sounds like you would still vote for him even though every thing
has gone to shit.
It really sounds like the battered wife syndrome.
It sounds like you like the misery and don't want it to go away. Your
happiest when things are bad.
Sorry
|
| | | | |
Date: 26 Jan 2009 20:58:54
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Dave" <bonanzaman@att.net > wrote in message
news:8qtfl.11820$D32.10297@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com...
>
>
> Irish Mike wrote:
>> "Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:26912d51-5daf-4ec4-acdb-0afdcb99bf37@s36g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 25, 3:53 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>> "Senator Millionaire" <moon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:0c93f0ce-f025-4711-97eb-9ab4f2fa6270@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jan 23, 5:00 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
>>>> Sorry to disappoint you bucko. But the idea that America created the
>>>> 9/11
>>>> terrorist attacks as part of some dark, evil political plot is absurd.
>>>> And
>>>> those two and a half sentences is about all that theory is worth.
>>>> Irish Mike
>>> What's absurd Irish Mike is YOU taking the 'official' version of the
>>> 9-11 commission at face value and leaving it at that. And remember,
>>> initially Bush was against any type of commission investigating
>>> 9-11!
>>>
>>> The former FBI director, Louis Freeh, wrote an article published in
>>> the Wall Street Journal titled:
>>>
>>> An Incomplete Investigation -- Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore
>>> "Able Danger"?
>>>
>>> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007559
>>>
>>> So now you disagree with the former FBI director? YOU are a
>>> disinformation shill and a complete fuckin' moron. How much are they
>>> paying you Irish Mike?
>>>
>>> OK, you got me bukco. I confess. The government secretly pays me $112.67
>>> a
>>> week for being a "disinformation shill" on a poker newsgroup. Plus, I
>>> get
>>> 5% of all the money they make selling tin foil hats to conspiracy nuts.
>>> So
>>> far, I'm making more on tin foil. As a point of curiosity, what are you
>>> guys who suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome going to do now that he's
>>> gone? I mean, given that The Messiah is strictly off limits, what will
>>> you
>>> do?
>>>
>>> Irish Mike
>>>
>>> I can see you're still having trouble answering the two simple
>>> questions I asked you.
>>
>> "It looks to me like YOU are the one suffering from 'Bush Derangement
>> Syndrome'. You probably voted for him twice and look what your vote
>> did! The National Debt is almost $11 trillion dollars and counting and
>> the economy is a disaster. And you're still licking Bush ass? You
>> really need to get your head examined!"
>>
>> I did vote for Bush twice because I thought the Democrats would be worse.
>> We have not had a terrorist attack on American soil in seven and a half
>> years. The national debt is terrible and your Messiah is about to make
>> it twice as bad. His phony stimulus plan in really just a thinly
>> disguised well fare, give away, entitlement program to buy votes. Many
>> of the people who get this Obama handout, pay zero income taxes. The
>> financial disaster started because Democrats, including your Messiah,
>> pressured banks in to making high risk mortgage loans to people who
>> wouldn't have qualified for a pup tent under the former bank lending
>> standards. Next time you talk with your Messiah you might want to tell
>> him that you can't spend your way out of a recession by taking money from
>> tax payers and using it to grow the government.
>>
>> Irish Mike
> Mike,
>
> The information about Bush is fact. What your spouting is fiction created
> in your little mind.
> You/we don't have a clue about whats going to go on in the future, but we
> absolutely do know what has happened in the past.
> You voted for a known which was proven to be wrong in pretty much all he
> did, it sounds like you would still vote for him even though every thing
> has gone to shit.
> It really sounds like the battered wife syndrome.
> It sounds like you like the misery and don't want it to go away. Your
> happiest when things are bad.
>
> Sorry
I don't like Obama, I don't trust him and I didn't vote for him. I think
his decision to gut America's defenses was wrong and his economic plan to
spend another trillion dollars on welfare programs and to grow the
government is stupid. However, I never want to see another terrorist attack
on American soil and would love to recover all the money I've lost as a
result of the subprine financial recession. So I hope he succeeds but I
don't think he will.
Irish Mike
|
| |
Date: 25 Jan 2009 05:37:06
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 23, 5:00=A0pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
>
> I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
>
> Sorry to disappoint you bucko. =A0But the idea that America created the 9=
/11
> terrorist attacks as part of some dark, evil political plot is absurd. =
=A0And
> those two and a half sentences is about all that theory is worth.
>
> Irish Mike
What's absurd Irish Mike is YOU taking the 'official' version of the
9-11 commission at face value and leaving it at that. And remember,
initially Bush was against any type of commission investigating
9-11!
The former FBI director, Louis Freeh, wrote an article published in
the Wall Street Journal titled:
An Incomplete Investigation -- Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore
"Able Danger"?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=3D110007559
So now you disagree with the former FBI director? YOU are a
disinformation shill and a complete fuckin' moron. How much are they
paying you Irish Mike?
I can see you're still having trouble answering the two simple
questions I asked you.
|
| | |
Date: 25 Jan 2009 15:53:12
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:0c93f0ce-f025-4711-97eb-9ab4f2fa6270@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 23, 5:00 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
>
> I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
>
> Sorry to disappoint you bucko. But the idea that America created the 9/11
> terrorist attacks as part of some dark, evil political plot is absurd. And
> those two and a half sentences is about all that theory is worth.
>
> Irish Mike
What's absurd Irish Mike is YOU taking the 'official' version of the
9-11 commission at face value and leaving it at that. And remember,
initially Bush was against any type of commission investigating
9-11!
The former FBI director, Louis Freeh, wrote an article published in
the Wall Street Journal titled:
An Incomplete Investigation -- Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore
"Able Danger"?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007559
So now you disagree with the former FBI director? YOU are a
disinformation shill and a complete fuckin' moron. How much are they
paying you Irish Mike?
OK, you got me bukco. I confess. The government secretly pays me $112.67 a
week for being a "disinformation shill" on a poker newsgroup. Plus, I get
5% of all the money they make selling tin foil hats to conspiracy nuts. So
far, I'm making more on tin foil. As a point of curiosity, what are you
guys who suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome going to do now that he's
gone? I mean, given that The Messiah is strictly off limits, what will you
do?
Irish Mike
I can see you're still having trouble answering the two simple
questions I asked you.
|
| |
Date: 23 Jan 2009 12:40:22
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 23, 11:55=A0am, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
>
> Irish Mike, are you going to try and answer the questions I asked you?
>
> Jets were scrambled and Bush was directed by his secret service detachmen=
t.
> Now pull down the shades, put another layer of tin foil on your hat and
> crawl back under the bed.
>
> Irish Mike
I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
|
| | |
Date: 23 Jan 2009 17:00:02
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:b913cd2f-bf57-473d-8a2d-7b1173e0a6f3@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 23, 11:55 am, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
>
> Irish Mike, are you going to try and answer the questions I asked you?
>
> Jets were scrambled and Bush was directed by his secret service
> detachment.
> Now pull down the shades, put another layer of tin foil on your hat and
> crawl back under the bed.
>
> Irish Mike
I really expected more from you Irish Mike. That was pathetic!
Sorry to disappoint you bucko. But the idea that America created the 9/11
terrorist attacks as part of some dark, evil political plot is absurd. And
those two and a half sentences is about all that theory is worth.
Irish Mike
|
| | | |
Date: 23 Jan 2009 18:36:54
From: Bryan Kimmes
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 23 2009 5:00 PM, Irish Mike wrote:
> > Jets were scrambled
> Irish Mike
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/norad/
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/AOPof911p12.html
------
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 23 Jan 2009 06:49:32
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 22, 4:37=A0pm, Senator Millionaire <moon...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 22, 1:23=A0pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
> > You guys have a severe case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. =A0What are y=
ou
> > going to do now that the object of your obsession is gone? =A0My guess =
is
> > start chasing your tails, frothing at the mouth (even more than usual) =
and
> > bitting any thing that comes near you.
>
> > Irish Mike
>
> OK...Irish Mike here's your chance and don't run away. If you can
> answer just two simple questions.
>
> 1. Why were no fighter jets scrambled to intercept the four hijacked
> airliners?
> 2. Why did Bush continue with the photo session and enter the
> classroom after admitting several times to seeing the first plane
> crashing into the WTC?
Irish Mike, are you going to try and answer the questions I asked you?
|
| | |
Date: 23 Jan 2009 11:55:08
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:c9709468-78e1-4027-a186-5b4cf6088aa4@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 22, 4:37 pm, Senator Millionaire <moon...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 22, 1:23 pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
> > You guys have a severe case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. What are you
> > going to do now that the object of your obsession is gone? My guess is
> > start chasing your tails, frothing at the mouth (even more than usual)
> > and
> > bitting any thing that comes near you.
>
> > Irish Mike
>
> OK...Irish Mike here's your chance and don't run away. If you can
> answer just two simple questions.
>
> 1. Why were no fighter jets scrambled to intercept the four hijacked
> airliners?
> 2. Why did Bush continue with the photo session and enter the
> classroom after admitting several times to seeing the first plane
> crashing into the WTC?
Irish Mike, are you going to try and answer the questions I asked you?
Jets were scrambled and Bush was directed by his secret service detachment.
Now pull down the shades, put another layer of tin foil on your hat and
crawl back under the bed.
Irish Mike
|
| |
Date: 22 Jan 2009 13:37:05
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 22, 1:23=A0pm, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
>
> You guys have a severe case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. =A0What are you
> going to do now that the object of your obsession is gone? =A0My guess is
> start chasing your tails, frothing at the mouth (even more than usual) an=
d
> bitting any thing that comes near you.
>
> Irish Mike
OK...Irish Mike here's your chance and don't run away. If you can
answer just two simple questions.
1. Why were no fighter jets scrambled to intercept the four hijacked
airliners?
2. Why did Bush continue with the photo session and enter the
classroom after admitting several times to seeing the first plane
crashing into the WTC?
|
| |
Date: 22 Jan 2009 08:53:28
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 22, 12:46=A0am, "ChrisRobin" <a9db...@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>
> I think the evidence is pretty conclusive, particularly given the stakes.
> See here:
>
> http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/powell_lies_to_un.html
>
You're definitely more likely right then wrong. Invading Iraq was
planned well before 9-11 and Powell didn't really have much choice
other than resigning. So yeah, I guess you're right, he was in on it.
|
| | |
Date: 22 Jan 2009 13:23:22
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:93a9d1a6-4a8d-4d64-88da-99d047f03608@g38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 22, 12:46 am, "ChrisRobin" <a9db...@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>
> I think the evidence is pretty conclusive, particularly given the stakes.
> See here:
>
> http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/powell_lies_to_un.html
>
You're definitely more likely right then wrong. Invading Iraq was
planned well before 9-11 and Powell didn't really have much choice
other than resigning. So yeah, I guess you're right, he was in on it.
You guys have a severe case of Bush Derangement Syndrome. What are you
going to do now that the object of your obsession is gone? My guess is
start chasing your tails, frothing at the mouth (even more than usual) and
bitting any thing that comes near you.
Irish Mike
|
| |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 17:54:00
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21, 1:53=A0pm, "ChrisRobin" <a9db...@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>
> He knowingly, deliberately LIED =97 repeatedly =97 to justify our invasio=
n of
> Iraq. This is indisputable fact, and history will bear this out. Period.
>
> -------=A0
> * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more..www.recgroups.com
I'm not sure Powell knowingly lied like you suggest. He may have been
uneasy about some of the information the CIA was feeding him.
|
| | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 21:46:03
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 8:54 PM, Senator Millionaire wrote:
> On Jan 21, 1:53 pm, "ChrisRobin" <a9db...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > He knowingly, deliberately LIED repeatedly to justify our invasion of
> > Iraq. This is indisputable fact, and history will bear this out. Period.
> >
> I'm not sure Powell knowingly lied like you suggest. He may have been
> uneasy about some of the information the CIA was feeding him.
I think the evidence is pretty conclusive, particularly given the stakes.
See here:
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/powell_lies_to_un.html
Keep in mind that this isn't the first time Colin went to bat and lied on
behalf of an embattled Administration. Do Mai Lai and Iran-Contra ring any
bells?
---
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 07:56:22
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20, 8:46=A0pm, "DaVoice" <davoice...@cox.net > wrote:
>
> The guy is GONE and you still want to blame him for what happened 7+ year=
s
> ago after Clinton gutted our "boots on the ground" intelliegence gatherin=
g?
> STFU and focus on the NOW, we have a lot more problems than whether or no=
t
> Bush saw the first plane hit the building. =A0What happened to "MOVE ON"
> moveon.org was started by people who thought we should "move on" from the
> Clinton impeachment. =A0Now YOU MOVE ON. =A0Jeebus
>
> --
> Rick "ADB DaVoice" Charles
You can't be serious? Bush can be charged with 'Dereliction of duty'
by a civilian court. The fact that four airliners were hijacked and
none were intercepted by fighters rests on Bush. Bush was in charge of
national defense...was he not? Most of us know that Bush and others
had foreknowledge of 9-11. His actions on that day speak for
themselves.
We also know that the largest FBI investigation ever was concluded
because the origin of the anthrax was determined to be from a U.S.
military installation. This leads most to conclude that the CIA was
involved. Did you really expect the FBI to implicate the CIA? Of
course not! The news generated by the anthrax attacks alerted the
American public to the dangers of WMD. The Bush administration was
then successfully able to connect the dangers of WMD with Saddam
Hussein, which in turn, lead to the invasion.
Did they find WMD? No! But they found plenty of oil and that's what
they were really looking for. Mission Accomplished!
Don't count on the major media or Rush Limbaugh (America's truth
detector LOL) to tell you that.
|
| |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:59:15
From: joeturn
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
He has diplomatic immunity
|
| | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:06:38
From: James L. Hankins
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"joeturn" <joeturn2000@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:e42cfc90-85e7-426a-b0a3-0ce05ff86603@k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
> He has diplomatic immunity
He does not. Nor does he need it.
|
| |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:46:30
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1d1269be-641c-42fa-ab90-ca1e42fcce64@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>I can't wait to hear what his testimony will be when the prosecutor
> starts questioning him about 9-11.
<snip the bullshit >
The guy is GONE and you still want to blame him for what happened 7+ years
ago after Clinton gutted our "boots on the ground" intelliegence gathering?
STFU and focus on the NOW, we have a lot more problems than whether or not
Bush saw the first plane hit the building. What happened to "MOVE ON"
moveon.org was started by people who thought we should "move on" from the
Clinton impeachment. Now YOU MOVE ON. Jeebus
--
Rick "ADB DaVoice" Charles
|
| |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:34:11
From: joeturn
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Our most recent Nobel Prize winner was ask if he intended to run for
the President!cy
His reply was "politics is poison"
|
| |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 15:11:23
From: Martin D
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
> Prosecutor: President Bush, on several >occasions you have said that you saw
> the first plane hit the WTC.
Bush Defense Attorney: Your Honor, as you and everybody else in this
country knows, my client is an idiot with a memory problem. (Defense
Attorney hits the 'play' button on a tape recorder):
G.W: "I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.
I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in...."
G.W: "fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. (long pause) It fool me
we can't get fooled again."
Defense Attorney: Now can we all take off our Tinfoil hats and get the
fuck out of here!
Judge: "I hear that." [Judge declares a mistrial, thanks the jury,
and then tells the bailiff to take the prosecuting attorney into
custody before setting a date for disbarment hearings to begin.
Everybody in the courtroom jumps for joy (except for that one
loudmouth cunt who's still convulsing on the floor from being
justifiably tazed numerous times )]
|
| | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 15:53:28
From: brewmaster
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20 2009 3:11 PM, Martin D wrote:
> > Prosecutor: President Bush, on several >occasions you have said that you
saw
> > the first plane hit the WTC.
>
> Bush Defense Attorney: Your Honor, as you and everybody else in this
> country knows, my client is an idiot with a memory problem. (Defense
> Attorney hits the 'play' button on a tape recorder):
>
> G.W: "I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.
> I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in...."
>
> G.W: "fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. (long pause) It fool me
> we can't get fooled again."
>
> Defense Attorney: Now can we all take off our Tinfoil hats and get the
> fuck out of here!
>
> Judge: "I hear that." [Judge declares a mistrial, thanks the jury,
> and then tells the bailiff to take the prosecuting attorney into
> custody before setting a date for disbarment hearings to begin.
> Everybody in the courtroom jumps for joy (except for that one
> loudmouth cunt who's still convulsing on the floor from being
> justifiably tazed numerous times )]
You fuckers crack me up. You can all say anything you want about Bush,
but if anybody says anything about Obama you call us whiners (and don't
even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the second
he was elected).
Brew
--
Email me here: http://tinymail.me/k4r2nk
-----
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 20:08:14
From: BillB
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"brewmaster" <a163b@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:oo4i46xs81.ln2@recgroups.com...
>(and don't
> even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the second
> he was elected).
Actually, Bush had a ~ 90% approval rating after 9/11. So you are wrong,
the polls clearly show people were willing to give Bush a chance. Most of
those people eventually turned on him, including a huge percentage of
Republicans, and it wasn't on a whim. It was *because of the things he said
and did*.
Even I was willing to give Bush a chance, even though I pretty much knew
from Day 1 he was a fool. I remember saying to myself, "maybe he'll surprise
me". Well, he sure did surprise me. He was 10x worse than I ever could have
imagined.
|
| | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 09:52:51
From: Travel A
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Tue, Jan 20, 2009, 8:08pm
From: BillB <nospam723@anon.com >
"brewmaster" <a163b@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:oo4i46xs81.ln2@recgroups.com...
(and don't
even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the
second he was elected).
Actually, Bush had a ~ 90% approval rating after 9/11. So you are wrong,
the polls clearly show people were willing to give Bush a chance. Most
of those people eventually turned on him, including a huge percentage of
Republicans, and it wasn't on a whim. It was *because of the things he
said and did*.
Even I was willing to give Bush a chance, even though I pretty much knew
from Day 1 he was a fool. I remember saying to myself, "maybe he'll
surprise me". Well, he sure did surprise me. He was 10x worse than I
ever could have imagined.
...............................................................................
Not even close to the truth.
The left wing stayed quite for a while after 9/11 and then took out the
knives again. And of course, you were cheerleading.
They stayed quiet only because it would have been political disaster to
go after Bush during the confusing aftermath of 9/11.
The vitriol from the left started-up again against Bush before he
actually even had a chance to do anything; never mind anything wrong.
The left wing was all for the Iraq invasion, including the New York
times. There's nothing they liked better thanb the elimination of
Israel's biggest threat.
As soon as the left wing knew that Bush was definitely going to invade
Iraq, they started criticizing him for the invasion of Iraq in order to,
as usual, damage Bush and the Republican party. They had it both ways.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 29 Jan 2009 09:52:11
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Irish Mike, it looks to me like you're staying up too late at night
and not getting enough sleep. You really should stop watching Art
Bell's Webcam and get some rest.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 29 Jan 2009 12:56:30
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:f3642ec4-931d-4382-8f02-4c6cda1d8347@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> Irish Mike, it looks to me like you're staying up too late at night
> and not getting enough sleep. You really should stop watching Art
> Bell's Webcam and get some rest.
I appreciate your concern bucko but I'm not an Art Bell fan. In fact, the
only time I've ever listened to him is on the car radio, in the wee hours
,when I'm driving home from a poker game. I don't hang with that tin foil
hat, trailer park, conspiracy under every bed crowd.
Irish Mike
|
| | | | | |
Date: 28 Jan 2009 09:35:14
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Irish Mike, why are you saying you answered the two simple questions?
Dribbling on about some nonsense isn't really an answer. Just admit
that you are unable to answer the questions. OK?
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 28 Jan 2009 14:10:14
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:9b6673e0-6cfe-4274-88d3-dca45879e197@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> Irish Mike, why are you saying you answered the two simple questions?
> Dribbling on about some nonsense isn't really an answer. Just admit
> that you are unable to answer the questions. OK?
I answered both of your questions. However, you have never answered my
questions. I'll repeat them now: Do you think 9/11 could have been caused
by aliens, pretending to be humans? Has any one in your trailer park been
abducted by aliens? Are we on the verge of a planet-wide alien invasion?
Could Art Bell be an alien? Do you think any of his callers are aliens?
Should I invest my money in tin foil hats or do you think the market is
saturated?
Irish Mike
|
| | | | | |
Date: 27 Jan 2009 12:26:12
From: Senator Millionaire
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
That about sums it up Irish Mike but don't worry. There aren't too
many Republicans or conservatives around who would care to try and
answer these two questions and that's the problem. With so many
unanswered questions about the 9-11 attacks, where are the
Republicans? Do you have to be an Independent or a Democrat to
question the 'official' story or the findings of the 9-11 commission?
1. Why were no fighter jets scrambled to intercept the four hijacked
airliners?
2. Why did Bush continue with the photo session and enter the
classroom after admitting several times to seeing the first plane
crashing into the WTC?
Evidence that George W. Bush had advanced knowledge of 9-11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw&feature=related
Does anyone know why Bush appears so jovial when answering the young
boys question in this video? His answer is so disgusting.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 27 Jan 2009 17:31:12
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Senator Millionaire" <moone99@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:b9912c31-5dda-48a4-98bc-0af585388e6d@v15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> That about sums it up Irish Mike but don't worry. There aren't too
> many Republicans or conservatives around who would care to try and
> answer these two questions and that's the problem. With so many
> unanswered questions about the 9-11 attacks, where are the
> Republicans? Do you have to be an Independent or a Democrat to
> question the 'official' story or the findings of the 9-11 commission?
>
> 1. Why were no fighter jets scrambled to intercept the four hijacked
> airliners?
> 2. Why did Bush continue with the photo session and enter the
> classroom after admitting several times to seeing the first plane
> crashing into the WTC?
>
> Evidence that George W. Bush had advanced knowledge of 9-11
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw&feature=related
>
> Does anyone know why Bush appears so jovial when answering the young
> boys question in this video? His answer is so disgusting.
I answered your questions bucko, you just didn't like the answers. Now put
another layer of tin foil on your hat, pull down the shades and tune in Art
Bell to get the latest news on alien abductions in a trailer park near you.
BTW, have you ever considered the possibility that 9/11 was really a plot by
aliens to take over the world? That maybe you're the only human being left
on the planet? That all those folks who keep telling you that you're
completely bat shit are really aliens? Jeepers!
Irish Mike
|
| | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 10:30:26
From: BillB
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"Travel A" <nine510@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:28286-497760F3-618@baytvnwsxa001.msntv.msn.com...
> They stayed quiet only because it would have been political disaster to
> go after Bush during the confusing aftermath of 9/11.
Uhhhh...I know you aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, but people who
respond to anonymous polls aren't typically concerned with "political
disasters". Bush had an approximately 90% approval rating on November 1,
2001. Over the next year and a half it slowly and steadlily declined to 60%.
By the end of his second term it had hit 25%. These are facts. That proves
beyond any doubt that the public was willing to give Bush a chance, and he
blew that chance in a way never before witnessed in the history of US
presidential politics.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 22 Jan 2009 04:55:14
From: Travel A
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Wed, Jan 21, 2009, 10:30am
From: BillB <nospam723@anon.com >
"Travel A" <nine510@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:28286-497760F3-618@baytvnwsxa001.msntv.msn.com...
They stayed quiet only because it would have been political disaster to
go after Bush during the confusing aftermath of 9/11.
Uhhhh...I know you aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, but people
who respond to anonymous polls aren't typically concerned with
"political disasters". Bush had an approximately 90% approval rating on
November 1,
2001. Over the next year and a half it slowly and steadlily declined to
60%. By the end of his second term it had hit 25%. These are facts. That
proves beyond any doubt that the public was willing to give Bush a
chance, and he blew that chance in a way never before witnessed in the
history of US presidential politics.
,................................................................................
Moron, we're talking about what brought down the polls. It was the
massive left wing, unfounded attacks on the Bush administration before
the invasion even occurred.
You're deceitfully trying to portray the left wing media and the
Democrats as (I'm laughing) "giving Bush a chance" and you have the gall
to include yourself in that lie.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 20:02:23
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:26 -0800, "BillB" <nospam723@anon.com >
wrote:
>
>"Travel A" <nine510@webtv.net> wrote in message
>news:28286-497760F3-618@baytvnwsxa001.msntv.msn.com...
>
>
>> They stayed quiet only because it would have been political disaster to
>> go after Bush during the confusing aftermath of 9/11.
>
>Uhhhh...I know you aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, but people who
>respond to anonymous polls aren't typically concerned with "political
>disasters". Bush had an approximately 90% approval rating on November 1,
>2001. Over the next year and a half it slowly and steadlily declined to 60%.
>By the end of his second term it had hit 25%. These are facts. That proves
>beyond any doubt that the public was willing to give Bush a chance, and he
>blew that chance in a way never before witnessed in the history of US
>presidential politics.
>
Ever heard of Harry S. Truman?
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 18:52:11
From: BillB
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com > wrote in message
news:uqkfn4pi9f3a1ef00lq24rnjuc7qs8mfmc@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:26 -0800, "BillB" <nospam723@anon.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Travel A" <nine510@webtv.net> wrote in message
>>news:28286-497760F3-618@baytvnwsxa001.msntv.msn.com...
>>
>>
>>> They stayed quiet only because it would have been political disaster to
>>> go after Bush during the confusing aftermath of 9/11.
>>
>>Uhhhh...I know you aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, but people who
>>respond to anonymous polls aren't typically concerned with "political
>>disasters". Bush had an approximately 90% approval rating on November 1,
>>2001. Over the next year and a half it slowly and steadlily declined to
>>60%.
>>By the end of his second term it had hit 25%. These are facts. That proves
>>beyond any doubt that the public was willing to give Bush a chance, and he
>>blew that chance in a way never before witnessed in the history of US
>>presidential politics.
>>
>
> Ever heard of Harry S. Truman?
I could be wrong but I think Bush's high/low approval spreads are a bit
higher than Truman's. Bush went from 92% in October, 2001 all the way down
to 19% in late 2008. I am pretty sure I read that that is a record.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 21:33:43
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:52:11 -0800, "BillB" <nospam723@anon.com >
wrote:
>
>"FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com> wrote in message
>news:uqkfn4pi9f3a1ef00lq24rnjuc7qs8mfmc@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:26 -0800, "BillB" <nospam723@anon.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Travel A" <nine510@webtv.net> wrote in message
>>>news:28286-497760F3-618@baytvnwsxa001.msntv.msn.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>> They stayed quiet only because it would have been political disaster to
>>>> go after Bush during the confusing aftermath of 9/11.
>>>
>>>Uhhhh...I know you aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, but people who
>>>respond to anonymous polls aren't typically concerned with "political
>>>disasters". Bush had an approximately 90% approval rating on November 1,
>>>2001. Over the next year and a half it slowly and steadlily declined to
>>>60%.
>>>By the end of his second term it had hit 25%. These are facts. That proves
>>>beyond any doubt that the public was willing to give Bush a chance, and he
>>>blew that chance in a way never before witnessed in the history of US
>>>presidential politics.
>>>
>>
>> Ever heard of Harry S. Truman?
>
>I could be wrong but I think Bush's high/low approval spreads are a bit
>higher than Truman's. Bush went from 92% in October, 2001 all the way down
>to 19% in late 2008. I am pretty sure I read that that is a record.
>
I think you are correct in what you say.
My only point is that Truman was an example of a President who left
office with a low public approval rating.
In Truman's case, the historians over the years have upgraded his
rating.
Historians have the advantage of perfect 20-20 hindsight to base their
opinions on.
The long term results of any President's policies can only be
evaluated with that perfect 20-20 hindsight.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 27 Jan 2009 08:59:00
From: Kyle T. Jones
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
FL Turbo, my dear, dear friend, there was this time, oh, 1/21/2009 9:33
PM or thereabouts, when you let the following craziness loose on Usenet:
>> I could be wrong but I think Bush's high/low approval spreads are a bit
>> higher than Truman's. Bush went from 92% in October, 2001 all the way down
>> to 19% in late 2008. I am pretty sure I read that that is a record.
>>
>
> I think you are correct in what you say.
>
> My only point is that Truman was an example of a President who left
> office with a low public approval rating.
>
> In Truman's case, the historians over the years have upgraded his
> rating.
>
> Historians have the advantage of perfect 20-20 hindsight to base their
> opinions on.
>
> The long term results of any President's policies can only be
> evaluated with that perfect 20-20 hindsight.
>
>
>
In the context of Bush, what policies do you think those are?
Cheers.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 27 Jan 2009 19:59:23
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:59:00 -0600, "Kyle T. Jones"
<KBfoMe@realdomain.net > wrote:
>FL Turbo, my dear, dear friend, there was this time, oh, 1/21/2009 9:33
>PM or thereabouts, when you let the following craziness loose on Usenet:
>
>>> I could be wrong but I think Bush's high/low approval spreads are a bit
>>> higher than Truman's. Bush went from 92% in October, 2001 all the way down
>>> to 19% in late 2008. I am pretty sure I read that that is a record.
>>>
>>
>> I think you are correct in what you say.
>>
>> My only point is that Truman was an example of a President who left
>> office with a low public approval rating.
>>
>> In Truman's case, the historians over the years have upgraded his
>> rating.
>>
>> Historians have the advantage of perfect 20-20 hindsight to base their
>> opinions on.
>>
>> The long term results of any President's policies can only be
>> evaluated with that perfect 20-20 hindsight.
>>
>
>In the context of Bush, what policies do you think those are?
>
Iraq has to be at the top of the list.
If the coming years see a stable, peaceful Iraq with a markedly better
economy, it will raise his rating.
I'm not making any Fearless Predictions, though.
I only have Hope for positive Change in the Middle East.
>Cheers.
Cheerios.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 22 Jan 2009 05:23:24
From: Travel A
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Wed, Jan 21, 2009, 9:33pm (PST+2)
From: FL Turbo <noemail@notime.com >
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:52:11 -0800, "BillB" <nospam723@anon.com > wrote:
"FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com > wrote in message
news:uqkfn4pi9f3a1ef00lq24rnjuc7qs8mfmc@4ax.com...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:26 -0800, "BillB" <nospam723@anon.com > wrote:
"Travel A" <nine510@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:28286-497760F3-618@baytvnwsxa001.msntv.msn.com...
They stayed quiet only because it would have been political disaster to
go after Bush during the confusing aftermath of 9/11.
Uhhhh...I know you aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer, but people
who respond to anonymous polls aren't typically concerned with
"political disasters". Bush had an approximately 90% approval rating on
November 1,
2001. Over the next year and a half it slowly and steadlily declined to
60%.
By the end of his second term it had hit 25%. These are facts. That
proves beyond any doubt that the public was willing to give Bush a
chance, and he blew that chance in a way never before witnessed in the
history of US presidential politics.
Ever heard of Harry S. Truman?
I could be wrong but I think Bush's high/low approval spreads are a bit
higher than Truman's. Bush went from 92% in October, 2001 all the way
down to 19% in late 2008. I am pretty sure I read that that is a record.
I think you are correct in what you say.
My only point is that Truman was an example of a President who left
office with a low public approval rating.
In Truman's case, the historians over the years have upgraded his
rating.
Historians have the advantage of perfect 20-20 hindsight to base their
opinions on.
The long term results of any President's policies can only be evaluated
with that perfect 20-20 hindsight.
.................................................................
He's not correct in what he says. He said that he "gave Bush a chance".
He didn't. He's full of shit.
Quoting the poll numbers of the people is just a smoke screen. The left
wing and BillB's approval rating of Bush started a "0" and ended at "0".
Being a left wing scumbag is one thing, but don't try to get way saying
that you were fair to Bush. I mean, that's the laugh of the month.
|
| | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 02:20:29
From: Paul Popinjay
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"BillB" <nospam723@anon.com > wrote in message
news:gl673d$rgh$1@news.motzarella.org...
>
> Actually, Bush had a ~ 90% approval rating after 9/11. So you are wrong,
> the polls clearly show people were willing to give Bush a chance. Most of
> those people eventually turned on him, including a huge percentage of
> Republicans, and it wasn't on a whim. It was *because of the things he
> said and did*.
>
I was never part of that 90%. I have hated him all along. I warned you, I
warned everyone. I knew what he was about from way before he became
president. I was right, as usual.
> Even I was willing to give Bush a chance,
Even YOU were willing to suck Bush's cock. You and Fl Turbo can share an
ICC holding cell together.
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:17:21
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20 2009 5:53 PM, brewmaster wrote:
> On Jan 20 2009 3:11 PM, Martin D wrote:
>
> > > Prosecutor: President Bush, on several >occasions you have said that you
> saw
> > > the first plane hit the WTC.
> >
> > Bush Defense Attorney: Your Honor, as you and everybody else in this
> > country knows, my client is an idiot with a memory problem. (Defense
> > Attorney hits the 'play' button on a tape recorder):
> >
> > G.W: "I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.
> > I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in...."
> >
> > G.W: "fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. (long pause) It fool me
> > we can't get fooled again."
> >
> > Defense Attorney: Now can we all take off our Tinfoil hats and get the
> > fuck out of here!
> >
> > Judge: "I hear that." [Judge declares a mistrial, thanks the jury,
> > and then tells the bailiff to take the prosecuting attorney into
> > custody before setting a date for disbarment hearings to begin.
> > Everybody in the courtroom jumps for joy (except for that one
> > loudmouth cunt who's still convulsing on the floor from being
> > justifiably tazed numerous times )]
>
> You fuckers crack me up. You can all say anything you want about Bush,
> but if anybody says anything about Obama you call us whiners (and don't
> even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the second
> he was elected).
>
> Brew
> --
> Email me here: http://tinymail.me/k4r2nk
au contraire my little rightie butt -boy . His rating were at 93% ater
9-11 and the whole world was behind him . After he started weaving his
magic , he was exposed for what he was .
NOW SIT DOWN AND STFU ....AS THE GROWN-UPS ARE IN CHARGE !!
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire
______________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 20:08:51
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:17:21 -0800, "FangBanger"
<a29bed1@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>On Jan 20 2009 5:53 PM, brewmaster wrote:
>
>> On Jan 20 2009 3:11 PM, Martin D wrote:
>>
>> > > Prosecutor: President Bush, on several >occasions you have said that you
>> saw
>> > > the first plane hit the WTC.
>> >
>> > Bush Defense Attorney: Your Honor, as you and everybody else in this
>> > country knows, my client is an idiot with a memory problem. (Defense
>> > Attorney hits the 'play' button on a tape recorder):
>> >
>> > G.W: "I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.
>> > I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in...."
>> >
>> > G.W: "fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. (long pause) It fool me
>> > we can't get fooled again."
>> >
>> > Defense Attorney: Now can we all take off our Tinfoil hats and get the
>> > fuck out of here!
>> >
>> > Judge: "I hear that." [Judge declares a mistrial, thanks the jury,
>> > and then tells the bailiff to take the prosecuting attorney into
>> > custody before setting a date for disbarment hearings to begin.
>> > Everybody in the courtroom jumps for joy (except for that one
>> > loudmouth cunt who's still convulsing on the floor from being
>> > justifiably tazed numerous times )]
>>
>> You fuckers crack me up. You can all say anything you want about Bush,
>> but if anybody says anything about Obama you call us whiners (and don't
>> even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the second
>> he was elected).
>>
>> Brew
>> --
>> Email me here: http://tinymail.me/k4r2nk
>
>au contraire my little rightie butt -boy . His rating were at 93% ater
>9-11 and the whole world was behind him . After he started weaving his
>magic , he was exposed for what he was .
>
>NOW SIT DOWN AND STFU ....AS THE GROWN-UPS ARE IN CHARGE !!
>
Are you fixin' to get in line behind Orangie and Razzo to suck Obama's
cock?
If the line goes around the block, will you still get in line?
-----------------------
Inquiring minds want to know.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 02:25:59
From: Paul Popinjay
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com > wrote in message
news:3l0dn4pup3gmmb59f18vdu8tlui2gki1ik@4ax.com...
>
> Are you [FangBanger] fixin' to get in line behind Orangie and Razzo to
> suck Obama's cock?
>
Doggystyle just wants to hump on his leg a little.
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:40:50
From: brewmaster
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20 2009 5:17 PM, FangBanger wrote:
> On Jan 20 2009 5:53 PM, brewmaster wrote:
>
> > On Jan 20 2009 3:11 PM, Martin D wrote:
> >
> > > > Prosecutor: President Bush, on several >occasions you have said that
you
> > saw
> > > > the first plane hit the WTC.
> > >
> > > Bush Defense Attorney: Your Honor, as you and everybody else in this
> > > country knows, my client is an idiot with a memory problem. (Defense
> > > Attorney hits the 'play' button on a tape recorder):
> > >
> > > G.W: "I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.
> > > I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in...."
> > >
> > > G.W: "fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. (long pause) It fool me
> > > we can't get fooled again."
> > >
> > > Defense Attorney: Now can we all take off our Tinfoil hats and get the
> > > fuck out of here!
> > >
> > > Judge: "I hear that." [Judge declares a mistrial, thanks the jury,
> > > and then tells the bailiff to take the prosecuting attorney into
> > > custody before setting a date for disbarment hearings to begin.
> > > Everybody in the courtroom jumps for joy (except for that one
> > > loudmouth cunt who's still convulsing on the floor from being
> > > justifiably tazed numerous times )]
> >
> > You fuckers crack me up. You can all say anything you want about Bush,
> > but if anybody says anything about Obama you call us whiners (and don't
> > even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the second
> > he was elected).
> >
> > Brew
> > --
> > Email me here: http://tinymail.me/k4r2nk
>
> au contraire my little rightie butt -boy . His rating were at 93% ater
> 9-11 and the whole world was behind him . After he started weaving his
> magic , he was exposed for what he was .
BULL SHIT!!!!
You all claimed he stole the election in Florida right from the beginning.
You never gave him a chance. His approval rating soared after his
handling of 9/11.
>
> NOW SIT DOWN AND STFU ....AS THE GROWN-UPS ARE IN CHARGE !!
>
> Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
> Voltaire
Brew
--
Email me here: http://tinymail.me/k4r2nk
-------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 19:42:03
From: Schmedley
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"brewmaster" <a163b@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:oo4i46xs81.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Jan 20 2009 3:11 PM, Martin D wrote:
>
>> > Prosecutor: President Bush, on several >occasions you have said that
>> > you
> saw
>> > the first plane hit the WTC.
>>
>> Bush Defense Attorney: Your Honor, as you and everybody else in this
>> country knows, my client is an idiot with a memory problem. (Defense
>> Attorney hits the 'play' button on a tape recorder):
>>
>> G.W: "I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.
>> I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in...."
>>
>> G.W: "fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. (long pause) It fool me
>> we can't get fooled again."
>>
>> Defense Attorney: Now can we all take off our Tinfoil hats and get the
>> fuck out of here!
>>
>> Judge: "I hear that." [Judge declares a mistrial, thanks the jury,
>> and then tells the bailiff to take the prosecuting attorney into
>> custody before setting a date for disbarment hearings to begin.
>> Everybody in the courtroom jumps for joy (except for that one
>> loudmouth cunt who's still convulsing on the floor from being
>> justifiably tazed numerous times )]
>
> You fuckers crack me up. You can all say anything you want about Bush,
> but if anybody says anything about Obama you call us whiners (and don't
> even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the second
> he was elected).
>
> Brew
To be fair, I really didn't totally hate Bush until his flacks called Max
Cleland a traitor. For that alone, he can rot.
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 19:23:05
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:42:03 -0500, "Schmedley" <schmegegel@yahoo.com >
wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
>
>To be fair, I really didn't totally hate Bush until his flacks called Max
>Cleland a traitor. For that alone, he can rot.
No one called Max Cleland a traitor.
Where do you get stupid shit like that?
Now consider CongressCritter Murtha.
Plenty of people have called him a traitor.
Are you sure that you haven't gotten the two of them mixed up?
|
| | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 00:15:48
From: Schmedley
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com > wrote in message
news:2stcn459nalmfhes1hbpa8blbang4899d1@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:42:03 -0500, "Schmedley" <schmegegel@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------
>>
>>To be fair, I really didn't totally hate Bush until his flacks called Max
>>Cleland a traitor. For that alone, he can rot.
>
> No one called Max Cleland a traitor.
>
> Where do you get stupid shit like that?
>
> Now consider CongressCritter Murtha.
> Plenty of people have called him a traitor.
>
> Are you sure that you haven't gotten the two of them mixed up?
OK they put a pix of him and OBL, then said he voted against homeland
security. That's not accusing him of being a traitor, but then I am a
stupid shit and cannot read between the lines.
And since Sax is such an original thinker, I am sure he and his campaign
thought all of this crap up without any help from Rove and the rest of the
gang.
None of which is not according to Hoyle in a campaign, but F Chambliss,
Rove, Bush and all the rest.
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:01:07
From: brewmaster
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20 2009 4:42 PM, Schmedley wrote:
> "brewmaster" <a163b@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:oo4i46xs81.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > On Jan 20 2009 3:11 PM, Martin D wrote:
> >
> >> > Prosecutor: President Bush, on several >occasions you have said that
> >> > you
> > saw
> >> > the first plane hit the WTC.
> >>
> >> Bush Defense Attorney: Your Honor, as you and everybody else in this
> >> country knows, my client is an idiot with a memory problem. (Defense
> >> Attorney hits the 'play' button on a tape recorder):
> >>
> >> G.W: "I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.
> >> I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in...."
> >>
> >> G.W: "fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. (long pause) It fool me
> >> we can't get fooled again."
> >>
> >> Defense Attorney: Now can we all take off our Tinfoil hats and get the
> >> fuck out of here!
> >>
> >> Judge: "I hear that." [Judge declares a mistrial, thanks the jury,
> >> and then tells the bailiff to take the prosecuting attorney into
> >> custody before setting a date for disbarment hearings to begin.
> >> Everybody in the courtroom jumps for joy (except for that one
> >> loudmouth cunt who's still convulsing on the floor from being
> >> justifiably tazed numerous times )]
> >
> > You fuckers crack me up. You can all say anything you want about Bush,
> > but if anybody says anything about Obama you call us whiners (and don't
> > even think of saying to give him a chance, you all were on Bush the second
> > he was elected).
> >
> > Brew
>
> To be fair, I really didn't totally hate Bush until his flacks called Max
> Cleland a traitor. For that alone, he can rot.
Hmmm not exactly accurate, is it?
http://mediamatters.org/items/200407300007
Brew
--
Email me here: http://tinymail.me/k4r2nk
------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 16:37:12
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Bush's trial? Don't tell me he got caught getting a blow job from one of
his young interns in the oval office. And then got caught lying his ass off
trying to get out of it. Well I have to admit that is pretty fucking
disgraceful conduct.
Irish Mike
|
| | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:12:54
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20 2009 3:37 PM, Irish Mike wrote:
> Bush's trial? Don't tell me he got caught getting a blow job from one of
> his young interns in the oval office. And then got caught lying his ass off
> trying to get out of it. Well I have to admit that is pretty fucking
> disgraceful conduct.
>
> Irish Mike
NO CHANCE .. What you describe is a heterosexual function . Prominent
righties dont get caught doing that !!
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire
-----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:30:28
From: MZB
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic fucking
war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
Mel
"Irish Mike" <mjostar@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:eurdl.11750$as4.5418@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Bush's trial? Don't tell me he got caught getting a blow job from one of
> his young interns in the oval office. And then got caught lying his ass
> off trying to get out of it. Well I have to admit that is pretty fucking
> disgraceful conduct.
>
> Irish Mike
>
>
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 17:48:50
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net > wrote in message
news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic
> fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give Bush
the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it you want
to put on trial?
--
Rick "ADB DaVoice" Charles
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:28:08
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic
> > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
>
> Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give Bush
> the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it you want
> to put on trial?
Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office of Special
Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually admitted
afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent). Flip them
and you've got your case against pretty much the entire Administration.
But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each other,
there'd be no one left to "govern."
------
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 23:55:01
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 12:28 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
>
> > "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> > news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic
> > > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
> >
> > Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give Bush
> > the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it you
want
> > to put on trial?
>
> Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office of Special
> Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually admitted
> afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent). Flip them
> and you've got your case against pretty much the entire Administration.
>
> But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each other,
> there'd be no one left to "govern."
Gt some proof of yur allegations, Chrissy ?
Atheism is drawing dead
____________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 00:54:12
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 2:55 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> On Jan 21 2009 12:28 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>
> > On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> >
> > > "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> > > news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > > > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic
> > > > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
> > >
> > > Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give
Bush
> > > the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it you
> want
> > > to put on trial?
> >
> > Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office of Special
> > Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually admitted
> > afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent). Flip them
> > and you've got your case against pretty much the entire Administration.
> >
> > But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each other,
> > there'd be no one left to "govern."
> Gt some proof of yur allegations, Chrissy ?
Cheney:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/17/iraq.usa
Powell:
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/34861/
---
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 02:56:54
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 3:54 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> On Jan 21 2009 2:55 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21 2009 12:28 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> > >
> > > > "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > > > > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic
> > > > > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
> > > >
> > > > Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give
> Bush
> > > > the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it you
> > want
> > > > to put on trial?
> > >
> > > Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office of
Special
> > > Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually admitted
> > > afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent). Flip
them
> > > and you've got your case against pretty much the entire Administration.
> > >
> > > But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each other,
> > > there'd be no one left to "govern."
>
> > Gt some proof of yur allegations, Chrissy ?
>
> Cheney:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/17/iraq.usa
>
> Powell:
> http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/34861/
Is it Christine or Christina ? Sorry hun, i dont see where Cheney admitted
to anything and you need to look at the Powell quotes again. He is only
quoted in a few situations here they are since you obviously attribute
anything with quotes to Powell
"The CIA was pushing the aluminum tube argument heavily and Cheney went
with that instead of what our guys wrote," Powell said. And the Niger
reference in Bush's State of the Union speech? "That was a big mistake,"
he said. "It should never have been in the speech. I didn't need Wilson to
tell me that there wasn't a Niger connection. He didn't tell us anything
we didn't already know. I never believed it."
When I pressed further as to why the president played up the Iraq nuclear
threat, Powell said it wasn't the president: "That was all Cheney."
We all realize that you will grasp at anything you can lil lady, speshully
from the sites that you twisted your quotes from. I am truly astonished
that you even exist. Atheism is drawing dead
________________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 10:53:43
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 5:56 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> On Jan 21 2009 3:54 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21 2009 2:55 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 21 2009 12:28 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > > > > > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged
idiotic
> > > > > > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give
> > Bush
> > > > > the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it
you
> > > want
> > > > > to put on trial?
> > > >
> > > > Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office of
> Special
> > > > Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually
admitted
> > > > afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent). Flip
> them
> > > > and you've got your case against pretty much the entire Administration.
> > > >
> > > > But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each
other,
> > > > there'd be no one left to "govern."
> >
> > > Gt some proof of yur allegations, Chrissy ?
> >
> > Cheney:
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/17/iraq.usa
> >
> > Powell:
> > http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/34861/
> Is it Christine or Christina ? Sorry hun, i dont see where Cheney admitted
> to anything and you need to look at the Powell quotes again. He is only
> quoted in a few situations here they are since you obviously attribute
> anything with quotes to Powell
I never claimed Cheney admitted anything. The link merely demonstrated how
he set up his own office, the OSP, to generate his own intelligence. That
intelligence has been conclusively and categorically proven false.
Therefore, Cheney is guilty of manufacturing false intelligence. Pretty
simple, actually.
To wit: "According to former Bush officials, all defence and intelligence
sources, senior administration figures created a shadow agency of Pentagon
analysts staffed mainly by ideological amateurs to compete with the CIA
and its military counterpart, the Defence Intelligence Agency."
"Ideological amateurs." In other words, hacks. Shills. Liars.
> "The CIA was pushing the aluminum tube argument heavily and Cheney went
> with that instead of what our guys wrote," Powell said. And the Niger
> reference in Bush's State of the Union speech? "That was a big mistake,"
> he said. "It should never have been in the speech. I didn't need Wilson to
> tell me that there wasn't a Niger connection. He didn't tell us anything
> we didn't already know. I never believed it."
>
> When I pressed further as to why the president played up the Iraq nuclear
> threat, Powell said it wasn't the president: "That was all Cheney."
>
> We all realize that you will grasp at anything you can lil lady, speshully
> from the sites that you twisted your quotes from. I am truly astonished
> that you even exist. Atheism is drawing dead
Read the opening paragraph of the Powell piece, you idiot:
"...Colin Powell said he never believed that Iraq posed an imminent
threat..."
And yet, he stood in front of the U.N. and told the assembled world
leaders just that. He lied about the aluminum tubes, claiming they were
for rockets (they weren't). He claimed to have proof that Husssein had
WMDs. He included photos of trucks he identified as mobile bioweapon
laboratories (they weren't). He brazenly misrepresented Iraq's nuclear and
chemical weapons capability. He played a tape of a conversation between
Iraqi army officers that was deliberately mistranslated to convey the
OPPOSITE meaning. He lied about the status of the U.N. inspections. He
lied about Iraqi connections to Al-Qaeda. There were so many lies in that
speech it's literally difficult to keep an accurate tally of them. Need I
go on?
And yet, he had the gall to say this: "My colleagues, every statement I
make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not
assertions. What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid
intelligence. I will cite some examples, and these are from human sources."
He knowingly, deliberately LIED repeatedly to justify our invasion of
Iraq. This is indisputable fact, and history will bear this out. Period.
-------
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 22 Jan 2009 05:09:25
From: Travel A
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Also, a 90% approval rating isn't going to be sustained by any
President. The polls showed the people supported the Iraq invasion
despite the left wing criticism.
Using the 90% approval rating, (which was a result immediately after a
national disaster) as as a standard from which Bush fell, is just
further demonstration of your dishonesty.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 15:39:41
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 1:53 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> On Jan 21 2009 5:56 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21 2009 3:54 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 21 2009 2:55 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jan 21 2009 12:28 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > > > > > > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged
> idiotic
> > > > > > > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to
give
> > > Bush
> > > > > > the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it
> you
> > > > want
> > > > > > to put on trial?
> > > > >
> > > > > Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office of
> > Special
> > > > > Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually
> admitted
> > > > > afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent). Flip
> > them
> > > > > and you've got your case against pretty much the entire
Administration.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each
> other,
> > > > > there'd be no one left to "govern."
> > >
> > > > Gt some proof of yur allegations, Chrissy ?
> > >
> > > Cheney:
> > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/17/iraq.usa
> > >
> > > Powell:
> > > http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/34861/
> > Is it Christine or Christina ? Sorry hun, i dont see where Cheney admitted
> > to anything and you need to look at the Powell quotes again. He is only
> > quoted in a few situations here they are since you obviously attribute
> > anything with quotes to Powell
>
> I never claimed Cheney admitted anything. The link merely demonstrated how
> he set up his own office, the OSP, to generate his own intelligence. That
> intelligence has been conclusively and categorically proven false.
> Therefore, Cheney is guilty of manufacturing false intelligence. Pretty
> simple, actually.
>
> To wit: "According to former Bush officials, all defence and intelligence
> sources, senior administration figures created a shadow agency of Pentagon
> analysts staffed mainly by ideological amateurs to compete with the CIA
> and its military counterpart, the Defence Intelligence Agency."
>
> "Ideological amateurs." In other words, hacks. Shills. Liars.
>
> > "The CIA was pushing the aluminum tube argument heavily and Cheney went
> > with that instead of what our guys wrote," Powell said. And the Niger
> > reference in Bush's State of the Union speech? "That was a big mistake,"
> > he said. "It should never have been in the speech. I didn't need Wilson to
> > tell me that there wasn't a Niger connection. He didn't tell us anything
> > we didn't already know. I never believed it."
> >
> > When I pressed further as to why the president played up the Iraq nuclear
> > threat, Powell said it wasn't the president: "That was all Cheney."
> >
> > We all realize that you will grasp at anything you can lil lady, speshully
> > from the sites that you twisted your quotes from. I am truly astonished
> > that you even exist. Atheism is drawing dead
>
> Read the opening paragraph of the Powell piece, you idiot:
>
> "...Colin Powell said he never believed that Iraq posed an imminent
> threat..."
>
> And yet, he stood in front of the U.N. and told the assembled world
> leaders just that. He lied about the aluminum tubes, claiming they were
> for rockets (they weren't). He claimed to have proof that Husssein had
> WMDs. He included photos of trucks he identified as mobile bioweapon
> laboratories (they weren't). He brazenly misrepresented Iraq's nuclear and
> chemical weapons capability. He played a tape of a conversation between
> Iraqi army officers that was deliberately mistranslated to convey the
> OPPOSITE meaning. He lied about the status of the U.N. inspections. He
> lied about Iraqi connections to Al-Qaeda. There were so many lies in that
> speech it's literally difficult to keep an accurate tally of them. Need I
> go on?
>
> And yet, he had the gall to say this: "My colleagues, every statement I
> make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not
> assertions. What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid
> intelligence. I will cite some examples, and these are from human sources."
>
> He knowingly, deliberately LIED repeatedly to justify our invasion of
> Iraq. This is indisputable fact, and history will bear this out. Period.
I can attest that the CIA has at least 1 person who is a spineless little
man who hides under the dress of the CIA.
Atheism is drawing dead
----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 21:37:40
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 6:39 PM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> On Jan 21 2009 1:53 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21 2009 5:56 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 21 2009 3:54 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jan 21 2009 2:55 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 21 2009 12:28 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > > > > > > > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged
> > idiotic
> > > > > > > > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to
> give
> > > > Bush
> > > > > > > the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is
it
> > you
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > to put on trial?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office of
> > > Special
> > > > > > Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually
> > admitted
> > > > > > afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent).
Flip
> > > them
> > > > > > and you've got your case against pretty much the entire
> Administration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each
> > other,
> > > > > > there'd be no one left to "govern."
> > > >
> > > > > Gt some proof of yur allegations, Chrissy ?
> > > >
> > > > Cheney:
> > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/17/iraq.usa
> > > >
> > > > Powell:
> > > > http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/34861/
> > > Is it Christine or Christina ? Sorry hun, i dont see where Cheney
admitted
> > > to anything and you need to look at the Powell quotes again. He is only
> > > quoted in a few situations here they are since you obviously attribute
> > > anything with quotes to Powell
> >
> > I never claimed Cheney admitted anything. The link merely demonstrated how
> > he set up his own office, the OSP, to generate his own intelligence. That
> > intelligence has been conclusively and categorically proven false.
> > Therefore, Cheney is guilty of manufacturing false intelligence. Pretty
> > simple, actually.
> >
> > To wit: "According to former Bush officials, all defence and intelligence
> > sources, senior administration figures created a shadow agency of Pentagon
> > analysts staffed mainly by ideological amateurs to compete with the CIA
> > and its military counterpart, the Defence Intelligence Agency."
> >
> > "Ideological amateurs." In other words, hacks. Shills. Liars.
> >
> > > "The CIA was pushing the aluminum tube argument heavily and Cheney went
> > > with that instead of what our guys wrote," Powell said. And the Niger
> > > reference in Bush's State of the Union speech? "That was a big mistake,"
> > > he said. "It should never have been in the speech. I didn't need Wilson
to
> > > tell me that there wasn't a Niger connection. He didn't tell us anything
> > > we didn't already know. I never believed it."
> > >
> > > When I pressed further as to why the president played up the Iraq nuclear
> > > threat, Powell said it wasn't the president: "That was all Cheney."
> > >
> > > We all realize that you will grasp at anything you can lil lady,
speshully
> > > from the sites that you twisted your quotes from. I am truly astonished
> > > that you even exist. Atheism is drawing
dead
> >
> > Read the opening paragraph of the Powell piece, you idiot:
> >
> > "...Colin Powell said he never believed that Iraq posed an imminent
> > threat..."
> >
> > And yet, he stood in front of the U.N. and told the assembled world
> > leaders just that. He lied about the aluminum tubes, claiming they were
> > for rockets (they weren't). He claimed to have proof that Husssein had
> > WMDs. He included photos of trucks he identified as mobile bioweapon
> > laboratories (they weren't). He brazenly misrepresented Iraq's nuclear and
> > chemical weapons capability. He played a tape of a conversation between
> > Iraqi army officers that was deliberately mistranslated to convey the
> > OPPOSITE meaning. He lied about the status of the U.N. inspections. He
> > lied about Iraqi connections to Al-Qaeda. There were so many lies in that
> > speech it's literally difficult to keep an accurate tally of them. Need I
> > go on?
> >
> > And yet, he had the gall to say this: "My colleagues, every statement I
> > make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not
> > assertions. What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid
> > intelligence. I will cite some examples, and these are from human sources."
> >
> > He knowingly, deliberately LIED repeatedly to justify our invasion of
> > Iraq. This is indisputable fact, and history will bear this out. Period.
> I can attest that the CIA has at least 1 person who is a spineless little
> man who hides under the dress of the CIA.
Nice rebuttal.
________________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 23:31:31
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 22 2009 12:37 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> On Jan 21 2009 6:39 PM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21 2009 1:53 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 21 2009 5:56 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jan 21 2009 3:54 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 21 2009 2:55 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 21 2009 12:28 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Jan 20 2009 8:48 PM, DaVoice wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
> > > > > > > > > Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged
> > > idiotic
> > > > > > > > > fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to
> > give
> > > > > Bush
> > > > > > > > the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is
> it
> > > you
> > > > > > want
> > > > > > > > to put on trial?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Start with Cheney for manufacturing false intelligence ("Office
of
> > > > Special
> > > > > > > Plans") and Powell for knowingly lying to the U.N. (he actually
> > > admitted
> > > > > > > afterward he knew portions of his presentation were fraudulent).
> Flip
> > > > them
> > > > > > > and you've got your case against pretty much the entire
> > Administration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting
each
> > > other,
> > > > > > > there'd be no one left to "govern."
> > > > >
> > > > > > Gt some proof of yur allegations, Chrissy ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheney:
> > > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/17/iraq.usa
> > > > >
> > > > > Powell:
> > > > > http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/34861/
> > > > Is it Christine or Christina ? Sorry hun, i dont see where Cheney
> admitted
> > > > to anything and you need to look at the Powell quotes again. He is only
> > > > quoted in a few situations here they are since you obviously attribute
> > > > anything with quotes to Powell
> > >
> > > I never claimed Cheney admitted anything. The link merely demonstrated
how
> > > he set up his own office, the OSP, to generate his own intelligence. That
> > > intelligence has been conclusively and categorically proven false.
> > > Therefore, Cheney is guilty of manufacturing false intelligence. Pretty
> > > simple, actually.
> > >
> > > To wit: "According to former Bush officials, all defence and intelligence
> > > sources, senior administration figures created a shadow agency of
Pentagon
> > > analysts staffed mainly by ideological amateurs to compete with the CIA
> > > and its military counterpart, the Defence Intelligence Agency."
> > >
> > > "Ideological amateurs." In other words, hacks. Shills. Liars.
> > >
> > > > "The CIA was pushing the aluminum tube argument heavily and Cheney
went
> > > > with that instead of what our guys wrote," Powell said. And the Niger
> > > > reference in Bush's State of the Union speech? "That was a big
mistake,"
> > > > he said. "It should never have been in the speech. I didn't need Wilson
> to
> > > > tell me that there wasn't a Niger connection. He didn't tell us
anything
> > > > we didn't already know. I never believed it."
> > > >
> > > > When I pressed further as to why the president played up the Iraq
nuclear
> > > > threat, Powell said it wasn't the president: "That was all Cheney."
> > > >
> > > > We all realize that you will grasp at anything you can lil lady,
> speshully
> > > > from the sites that you twisted your quotes from. I am truly astonished
> > > > that you even exist. Atheism is drawing
> dead
> > >
> > > Read the opening paragraph of the Powell piece, you idiot:
> > >
> > > "...Colin Powell said he never believed that Iraq posed an imminent
> > > threat..."
> > >
> > > And yet, he stood in front of the U.N. and told the assembled world
> > > leaders just that. He lied about the aluminum tubes, claiming they were
> > > for rockets (they weren't). He claimed to have proof that Husssein had
> > > WMDs. He included photos of trucks he identified as mobile bioweapon
> > > laboratories (they weren't). He brazenly misrepresented Iraq's nuclear
and
> > > chemical weapons capability. He played a tape of a conversation between
> > > Iraqi army officers that was deliberately mistranslated to convey the
> > > OPPOSITE meaning. He lied about the status of the U.N. inspections. He
> > > lied about Iraqi connections to Al-Qaeda. There were so many lies in that
> > > speech it's literally difficult to keep an accurate tally of them. Need I
> > > go on?
> > >
> > > And yet, he had the gall to say this: "My colleagues, every statement I
> > > make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not
> > > assertions. What we're giving you are facts and conclusions based on
solid
> > > intelligence. I will cite some examples, and these are from human
sources."
> > >
> > > He knowingly, deliberately LIED repeatedly to justify our invasion of
> > > Iraq. This is indisputable fact, and history will bear this out. Period.
>
> > I can attest that the CIA has at least 1 person who is a spineless little
> > man who hides under the dress of the CIA.
>
> Nice rebuttal.
it wasnt a rebuttal
Atheism is drawing dead
________________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:42:41
From: Paul Popinjay
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"ChrisRobin" <a9dbf1e@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:8coi46x9p4.ln2@recgroups.com...
>
> But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each other,
> there'd be no one left to "govern."
>
It's gems like this that will keep you out of my new kill-suite, Chris.
Too bad the same can't be said for Risky Biz. I've already instructed the
maids to start stocking his with assorted soft drinks and $2.50 bottled
drinking water, but no individually wrapped plastic cups. It's going to be
rough.
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 22:23:02
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 12:42 AM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> "ChrisRobin" <a9dbf1e@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:8coi46x9p4.ln2@recgroups.com...
>
> >
> > But it'll never happen. If the elites went around prosecuting each other,
> > there'd be no one left to "govern."
> >
>
> It's gems like this that will keep you out of my new kill-suite, Chris.
Even a stopped clock... A pretty sad commentary on our current state of
affairs, ain't it?
> Too bad the same can't be said for Risky Biz. I've already instructed the
> maids to start stocking his with assorted soft drinks and $2.50 bottled
> drinking water, but no individually wrapped plastic cups. It's going to be
> rough.
Go easy on Risky. He's got more of a clue than 99% of the ditto-heads who
troll these waters.
That said... keep the suite stocked. I may need some refreshments.
----
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 19:54:22
From: James L. Hankins
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net > wrote in message
news:cavdl.13814$1L3.13286@newsfe20.iad...
>
> "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
> news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
>> Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic
>> fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
>
> Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give Bush
> the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it you
> want to put on trial?
>
> --
> Rick "ADB DaVoice" Charles
It's a troll, Rick. No rational person remotely believes that Bush is going
to charged and tried for anything.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:14:08
From: Paul Popinjay
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
"James L. Hankins" <jhankins5@cox.net > wrote in message
news:ifvdl.119155$ln7.40545@newsfe04.iad...
>
> It's a troll, Rick. No rational person remotely believes that Bush is
> going to charged and tried for anything.
I don't care about Bush. I'd like to see FL TURBO put on trial!
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 21 Jan 2009 00:51:11
From: RazzO
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-190507
On Jan 20 2009 9:14 PM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> I'd like to see FL TURBO put on trial!
RazzO
"Fucking poker, brings out the mental illness
in everyone!" - Porsche_Dan
________________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 22:30:09
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 12:14 AM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> "James L. Hankins" <jhankins5@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:ifvdl.119155$ln7.40545@newsfe04.iad...
>
> >
> > It's a troll, Rick. No rational person remotely believes that Bush is
> > going to charged and tried for anything.
>
> I don't care about Bush. I'd like to see FL TURBO put on trial!
Now you're talking!
Question is, what do you charge him with? This deserves it's own thread!
RGP, it's your time to shine!
------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:37:20
From: IHeartWuzzy
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 21 2009 12:14 AM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
>
> I don't care about Bush. I'd like to see FL TURBO put on trial!
WORD.
"I have no fucking clue" -- John_Brian_K, rgp, 1/19/2009
http://tinyurl.com/72ph6v
_______________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:15:24
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:54:22 -0600, "James L. Hankins"
<jhankins5@cox.net > wrote:
>
>"DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:cavdl.13814$1L3.13286@newsfe20.iad...
>>
>> "MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote in message
>> news:bgsdl.118541$ln7.26201@newsfe04.iad...
>>> Yeah, I know. Getting our country into a fucked up prolonged idiotic
>>> fucking war on false pretenses just pales in comparison.
>>
>> Ummm..lemme see. Powell went before the U.N, Congress voted to give Bush
>> the power to wage the war, Biden was the pointman, just WHO is it you
>> want to put on trial?
>>
>> --
>> Rick "ADB DaVoice" Charles
>
>
>
>It's a troll, Rick. No rational person remotely believes that Bush is going
>to charged and tried for anything.
>
How about "....former Bush Administration officials...." ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
said that House Democrats would be open to the possibility of
investigating and potentially prosecuting former Bush Administration
officials for alleged crimes committed during the Bush years.
Pelosi said that Democrats may even be forced to pursue prosecution in
some instances, even though doing so might be politically costly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did Pelosi just say that to watch Henry Waxman's nostrils quivering
like a bunny scenting a carrot?
--
"Holy fuck city, Turbo, you really ARE the biggest moron on this whole
entire newsgroup. I will pray for you." - Paul Popinjay, 11/7/2008
|
| | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 14:00:59
From: Ian Stuart
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
On Jan 20 2009 10:37 PM, Irish Mike wrote:
> Bush's trial? Don't tell me he got caught getting a blow job from one of
> his young interns in the oval office.
Absolutely shocking behavior. How dare he! Compared to that, waging all
out war on a country that poses no viable threat, blatantly stuffing your
cronies pockets with lucrative government contracts and pissing all over
the constitution just pales into insignificance.
As to the Clinton affair, if being president doesn't entitle you to the
occasional BJ from a willing junior staffer, there's something seriously
wrong with the system.
________________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 14:20:44
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: When Does the Bush Trial Start?
|
Bush got rid of 2 bad countries, the 100 year plan isnt done yet and we
are behind schedule. Do you know that Biden is head of the committee that
oversaw the warplans that were handed down . Yup, your boy Biden was the
pointman. I agree with what they did. It's funny how the ignorant espouse
such wisdom.
On Jan 20 2009 5:00 PM, Ian Stuart wrote:
> On Jan 20 2009 10:37 PM, Irish Mike wrote:
>
> > Bush's trial? Don't tell me he got caught getting a blow job from one of
> > his young interns in the oval office.
>
> Absolutely shocking behavior. How dare he! Compared to that, waging all
> out war on a country that poses no viable threat, blatantly stuffing your
> cronies pockets with lucrative government contracts and pissing all over
> the constitution just pales into insignificance.
>
> As to the Clinton affair, if being president doesn't entitle you to the
> occasional BJ from a willing junior staffer, there's something seriously
> wrong with the system.
Atheism is drawing dead
_____________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
|
