| |
Main
Date: 15 Dec 2008 17:50:08
From: Kingo Gondo
Subject: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
Justices won't review Obama's eligibility to serve
6 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court has turned down another challenge to
Barack Obama's eligibility to serve president because of his citizenship.
The appeal by Cort Wrotnowski of Greenwich, Conn., was denied Monday without
comment.
Wrotnowski argued that Obama was a British subject at birth and therefore
cannot meet the requirement for becoming president.
He wanted the high court to halt presidential electors from meeting to
formally elect Obama as president.
Echoing an appeal that was rejected by justices last week, Wrotnowski said
that since Obama had dual nationality at birth - his mother was American,
his Kenyan father was a British subject - he cannot possibly be a "natural
born citizen."
At least two other appeals over Obama's citizenship remain at the court.
Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya,
not Hawaii as Obama says and Hawaii officials have confirmed.
Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg's lawsuit. Federal courts
in Ohio and Washington state have rejected similar lawsuits.
Allegations raised on the Internet say the birth certificate, showing that
Obama was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961, is a fake.
But Hawaii Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino and the state's
registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, say they checked health
department records and have determined there's no doubt Obama was born in
Hawaii.
The nonpartisan Web site Factcheck.org examined the original document and
said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine
document.
In addition, Factcheck.org reproduced an announcement of Obama's birth,
including his parents' address in Honolulu, that was published in the
Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 13, 1961.
|
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 17:38:42
From: Bob T.
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
On Dec 15, 3:45=A0pm, OrangeSFO <intangible...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> OMG the Supreme Court is SO IN THE TANK for Obama!
PokerToker will be back tomorrow to report on the impending
impeachment of the entire Supreme Court.
- Bob T.
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 18:33:25
From: Lynx
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
> PokerToker will be back tomorrow to report on the impending
> impeachment of the entire Supreme Court.
Yeah, but where is he TODAY? I was so looking forward to his rants about
the electors not electing Obama. I guess I'll just have to go another day
without my regular comic relief.
____________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 21:42:39
From: James L. Hankins
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
"Lynx" <a16a9@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:lkgj16xm63.ln2@recgroups.com...
>> PokerToker will be back tomorrow to report on the impending
>> impeachment of the entire Supreme Court.
>
> Yeah, but where is he TODAY?
Too busy trolling the usual suspects as La Cosa Nostradamus.
|
| | | | |
Date: 16 Dec 2008 11:38:28
From: John B
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
...just WHY doesn't obama release the long form copy of his birth
certificate? Hawaii says they do have one, but that's all they've said
about it. This would quell all lawsuits and rumors.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 16 Dec 2008 12:55:00
From: Patrick Karl
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
John B wrote:
> ...just WHY doesn't obama release the long form copy of his birth
> certificate? Hawaii says they do have one, but that's all they've said
> about it. This would quell all lawsuits and rumors.
>
If I were Obama, I wouldn't release my birth certificate to these kooks
just so they would spend a lot of money pursuing the matter in federal
court. I suspect that these suits are not cheap.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 16 Dec 2008 09:21:50
From: Bob T.
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
On Dec 16, 8:38=A0am, Nortwo...@webtv.net (John B) wrote:
> ...just WHY doesn't obama release the long form copy of his birth
> certificate? =A0 Hawaii says they do have one, but that's all they've sai=
d
> about it. =A0 This would quell all lawsuits and rumors.
No, it wouldn't. There were three full investigations into Vince
Foster's death, including one led by Ken Starr. Each investigation
came to the conclusion that it was suicide. Did that stop the
nutcases from claiming that Hillary had him murdered? It did not.
- Bob T.
|
| |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 15:45:15
From: OrangeSFO
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
OMG the Supreme Court is SO IN THE TANK for Obama!
|
| | |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 18:59:10
From: Clave
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
"OrangeSFO" <intangible103@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:5c9fb9fd-ecd4-4b11-b30d-a2c4e9ff8b36@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> OMG the Supreme Court is SO IN THE TANK for Obama!
"In the tank" needs to be repeated until conservatives are sick of hearing
it.
Jim
|
| | | |
Date: 15 Dec 2008 21:15:18
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: Supreme Court tosses another Obama k00k today
|
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:59:10 -0800, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com > wrote:
>"OrangeSFO" <intangible103@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:5c9fb9fd-ecd4-4b11-b30d-a2c4e9ff8b36@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> OMG the Supreme Court is SO IN THE TANK for Obama!
>
>"In the tank" needs to be repeated until conservatives are sick of hearing
>it.
>
>Jim
>
Go for it.
You're just the guy to repeat a Mindless Meme when he doesn't have
anything new to offer.
Then your patented "I win."
You and Orangie are "twins separated at birth."
|
|
