| |
Main
Date: 09 Feb 2009 20:20:27
From: Clave
Subject: Re: Listening to the president
|
"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com > wrote in message news:...
> "FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com> wrote in message
> news:j9u1p4p2d68h0jgj9m0o67oi2b9qkrlqum@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:35:17 -0800, "Clave"
>> <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"da pickle" <jcpickels@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:DpSdneF47-RHSA3URVn_vwA@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>>I did not think it could be worse than listening to GWB.
>>>
>>>You're just not used to literate speakers.
>>
>> Using "uh, er, uh" in every other sentence is the sign of a literate
>> speaker, is it?
>
> It doesn't mean much when someone's speaking expemporaneously (look it up)
^
t (enjoy your typo flame)
> about complex topics. He did manage to speak in grammatically correct
> sentences, you know.
>
>
>> By your standards, Bush was a great speaker.
>
> Bush had trouble reading coherently from a professionally-prepared script.
>
> You guys are saying a whole lot less about Obama's eleocution (look that
> up too) than you are about how little it takes to make wingnuts whine.
>
> Jim
>
>
|
|
| |
Date: 11 Feb 2009 18:50:11
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: Listening to the president
|
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:20:27 -0800, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com > wrote:
>"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote in message news:...
>> "FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com> wrote in message
>> news:j9u1p4p2d68h0jgj9m0o67oi2b9qkrlqum@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:35:17 -0800, "Clave"
>>> <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"da pickle" <jcpickels@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:DpSdneF47-RHSA3URVn_vwA@giganews.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>I did not think it could be worse than listening to GWB.
>>>>
>>>>You're just not used to literate speakers.
>>>
>>> Using "uh, er, uh" in every other sentence is the sign of a literate
>>> speaker, is it?
>>
>> It doesn't mean much when someone's speaking expemporaneously (look it up)
> ^
> t (enjoy your typo flame)
>> about complex topics. He did manage to speak in grammatically correct
>> sentences, you know.
>>
Hey, would I ever make big deal out of someone's typo?
All I would have said is that bullshit spoken in grammatically correct
sentences is still bullshit after all.
>>
>>> By your standards, Bush was a great speaker.
>>
>> Bush had trouble reading coherently from a professionally-prepared script.
>>
>> You guys are saying a whole lot less about Obama's eleocution (look that
>> up too) than you are about how little it takes to make wingnuts whine.
>>
>> Jim
>>
Hey, you are slandering me.
I've never made any comments about Obama's "eleocution".
I don't even know what that means.
<giggle >
I can't ever remember a President bringing a TelePrompTer to a press
conference.
<snort >
|
| |
Date: 09 Feb 2009 22:35:13
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: Listening to the president
|
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:20:27 -0800, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com > wrote:
>"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote in message news:...
>> "FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com> wrote in message
>> news:j9u1p4p2d68h0jgj9m0o67oi2b9qkrlqum@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:35:17 -0800, "Clave"
>>> <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"da pickle" <jcpickels@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:DpSdneF47-RHSA3URVn_vwA@giganews.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>I did not think it could be worse than listening to GWB.
>>>>
>>>>You're just not used to literate speakers.
>>>
>>> Using "uh, er, uh" in every other sentence is the sign of a literate
>>> speaker, is it?
>>
>> It doesn't mean much when someone's speaking expemporaneously (look it up)
> ^
> t (enjoy your typo flame)
>> about complex topics. He did manage to speak in grammatically correct
>> sentences, you know.
>>
>>
>>> By your standards, Bush was a great speaker.
>>
>> Bush had trouble reading coherently from a professionally-prepared script.
>>
>> You guys are saying a whole lot less about Obama's eleocution (look that
>> up too) than you are about how little it takes to make wingnuts whine.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
