| |
Main
Date: 18 Dec 2008 03:11:39
From: - ikabopo -
Subject: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
there are very few.
And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
$10,000.00.
Consider me on this list. Because I am.
-ikabopo-
|
|
| |
Date: 21 Dec 2008 17:47:02
From:
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18, 2:11=A0am, ikab...@webtv.net (- ikabopo -) wrote:
> ..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. =A0Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. =A0This i=
s
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. =A0Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. =A0You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. =A0Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Put me on the list.
Croupe
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 20:30:35
From: I eat donks
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 8:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Why is 10 K so special? Some of us has lost or won 8K in a single hand.
Note that I didnt say raking in a pot of 8K, but actually winning or
losing 8K in a single hand.
10K over a lifetime of poker? I piss at the figure.
'One is all for religion until one visits a really religious country.
Then, one is all for drains, machinery and a minimum wage.' Aldous Huxley
-------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 21 Dec 2008 16:55:47
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 11:30 PM, I eat donks wrote:
>
> Why is 10 K so special? Some of us has lost or won 8K in a single hand.
> Note that I didnt say raking in a pot of 8K, but actually winning or
> losing 8K in a single hand.
>
IRS gets involved over 10k
________________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Dec 2008 06:28:25
From: I eat donks
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 22 2008 12:55 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> On Dec 18 2008 11:30 PM, I eat donks wrote:
>
> >
> > Why is 10 K so special? Some of us has lost or won 8K in a single hand.
> > Note that I didnt say raking in a pot of 8K, but actually winning or
> > losing 8K in a single hand.
> >
>
> IRS gets involved over 10k
Yes, and? I say fuck the IRS. I can say that because I am lucky enough
not to live in a Socialist Dictatorship that is the US of A.
'Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer, we'll Keep the red flag flying
here.' The Red Flag
----
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 22 Dec 2008 02:54:09
From: Patti Beadles
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
In article <j55326xmu1.ln2@recgroups.com >,
La Cosa Nostradamus <a6f44ce@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>IRS gets involved over 10k
Not exactly.
If you're in the US, the IRS *should* be involved in every
single session. Most gamblers don't report their wins and
losses properly, But last night when you played poker with
your buddies and won $17 was a taxable event.
With a single cash transaction of $10,000 or more, there
must be a Currency Transaction Report. The CTR isn't for
the IRS, really. Google Bank Secrecy Act for more info.
I'm sitting in McCarran right now, on my way home. I have
a W-2G in my pocket thanks to a single $4000 win. The threshold
for reporting some gambling wins to the IRS is $1200.
-Patti
--
Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA
|
| | | | |
Date: 22 Dec 2008 00:20:52
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 21 2008 9:54 PM, Patti Beadles wrote:
> In article <j55326xmu1.ln2@recgroups.com>,
> La Cosa Nostradamus <a6f44ce@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> >IRS gets involved over 10k
>
> Not exactly.
>
> If you're in the US, the IRS *should* be involved in every
> single session. Most gamblers don't report their wins and
> losses properly, But last night when you played poker with
> your buddies and won $17 was a taxable event.
>
> With a single cash transaction of $10,000 or more, there
> must be a Currency Transaction Report. The CTR isn't for
> the IRS, really. Google Bank Secrecy Act for more info.
>
> I'm sitting in McCarran right now, on my way home. I have
> a W-2G in my pocket thanks to a single $4000 win. The threshold
> for reporting some gambling wins to the IRS is $1200.
>
I think the penalty goes up at 10k tho
> -Patti
> --
> Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA
|
| | | | | |
Date: 22 Dec 2008 08:17:49
From: Patti Beadles
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
In article <48v326xtp4.ln2@recgroups.com >,
La Cosa Nostradamus <a6f44ce@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>I think the penalty goes up at 10k tho
Please cite references. That does not jibe with the facts
as I know them.
-Patti
--
Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 17:30:50
From: Joe Long
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
- ikabopo - wrote:
> ..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
Do you work for the IRS by any chance?
No matter. I've been playing poker for about ten years, I track every
session on my computer, and my net profit to date is well over $10,000.
--
Joe Long aka ChipRider
Somewhere on the Range
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 14:52:12
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
"- ikabopo -" <ikabopo@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:29130-494A05BB-251@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net...
> ..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Ok, I'm responding. What do you want to know? I kept spreadsheets of
games/rooms/limits/tokes/days of the week/tourneys/session /win or loss/food
and travel expenses/room expenses/ misc expenses for a number of years, I
also kept a separate spreadsheet with the same type of info for "other
gaming" and had to file taxes with the information one year to offset some
HUGE scores at the Mobile, AL dog track and hitting a $77k keno win.
--
Rick "ADB DaVoice" Charles
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 16:28:31
From: Paul Popinjay
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
"DaVoice" <davoicergp@cox.net > wrote in message
>
I kept spreadsheets of
> games/rooms/limits/tokes/days of the week/tourneys/session /win or
> loss/food and travel expenses/room expenses/ misc expenses for a number
> of years,
Holy shit, Rick, what a fucking nit!
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 14:43:50
From: FellKnight
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 3:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
I fail to see the point, but yes.
Fell
--
Be Loud. Be Proud. Be Considerate!
--------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 14:31:05
From: Omaholic
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
What is your goal in making such a list?
Also, I agree with Patti. :)
On Dec 18 2008 12:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
______________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 13:12:01
From: Tad Perry
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
"- ikabopo -" <ikabopo@webtv.net > wrote in message
news:29130-494A05BB-251@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net...
> ..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
Sklansky's test is whether you earn 50k or more per year or not. I haven't
ever done that, but I've won 10k.
tvp
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 11:09:32
From: Arlo-Payne
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 1:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
When playing in the 90s part time averaged 175K per year
------
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 12:45:59
From: DELETETHIS
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
by playing poker and not sports books I have profited much more than
$10,000. I only lose a few hundred (average) for each time I play poker
and I lose MUCH more than that betting sports. Is that what you had in
mind - hope that helps
- ikabopo - wrote:
> ..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
>
|
| | |
Date: 20 Dec 2008 06:49:19
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 12:45 PM, DELETETHIS wrote:
> by playing poker and not sports books I have profited much more than
> $10,000. I only lose a few hundred (average) for each time I play poker
> and I lose MUCH more than that betting sports. Is that what you had in
> mind - hope that helps
You might be amazed at how many people this post would cover .. and I mean
BIG NAMES.
>
> - ikabopo - wrote:
> > ..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> > year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
> >
> > I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> > a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> > there are very few.
> >
> > And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> > respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> > ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> > if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> > $10,000.00.
> >
> > Consider me on this list. Because I am.
> >
> > -ikabopo-
> >
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire
____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 10:04:43
From: MrBookworm
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
I'm close. The home game I play (over the last 18 months) is good for $1K
plus a year and I've generally made $1-$2K online since 2003. I won $3 in
my kitchen last Saturday as our xmas party was winding down.
Dean
_____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 17:25:51
From: Patti Beadles
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
Why set the threshold so low?
-Patti
--
Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA
|
| | |
Date: 19 Dec 2008 17:49:49
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 11:25 AM, Patti Beadles wrote:
> Why set the threshold so low?
YEAH .. HOW ABOUT MORE THAN ONE WINNING YEAR IN A ROW .. OR WINNING YEARS
IN MORE THAN ONE DECADE
>
> -Patti
> --
> Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA
|
| | | |
Date: 19 Dec 2008 18:18:18
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 19 2008 7:49 PM, FangBanger wrote:
> YEAH .. HOW ABOUT MORE THAN ONE WINNING YEAR IN A ROW .. OR WINNING YEARS
> IN MORE THAN ONE DECADE
YEAH .. OR HOW ABOUT OLDEST MOST WASHED UP .. LOSER !! YOU RUSS AND HANKS
CAN HAVE A BEST OF 5 RETARD-A-THON FOR THE ULTIMATE WINNER !!
---
Morphy
xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
"SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio
--------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 19:47:16
From: garycarson
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 12:25 PM, Patti Beadles wrote:
> Why set the threshold so low?
Requiring that you've kept exact records of all poker activity for a
lifetime is not a low threshold.
I once one a $50 IOU in a shipboard payday stakes game. I collected $20
biweekly juice for about 9 months and when I got out of the Navy he still
owed me $50 and I retired the debt.
Is that a win?
_______________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 22:22:18
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 9:47 PM, garycarson wrote:
> On Dec 18 2008 12:25 PM, Patti Beadles wrote:
>
> > Why set the threshold so low?
>
> Requiring that you've kept exact records of all poker activity for a
> lifetime is not a low threshold.
>
> I once one a $50 IOU in a shipboard payday stakes game. I collected $20
> biweekly juice for about 9 months and when I got out of the Navy he still
> owed me $50 and I retired the debt.
>
> Is that a win?
they musta done something to Navy guys at Great lakes . My older brother
was in nuclear subs for 8 years , and he cant play a fuckin lick of poker .
---------------- insert 'must run in the family" joke here!!
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire
--------
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 08:46:47
From: CincinnatiKid
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 3:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Won more than 10k in a single tournament. I am the greatest!
Most people who frequent a poker newsgroup and discuss the game should
easily be winning players. Not sure what 95% of the people that post here
excuse is.
--------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 08:16:25
From: GrouchySmurf1002
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 3:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Word.
________________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 10:54:29
From: WG
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
Done that.
Murk on Pacific
By the way....... anyone know how long sharkscope has been up and =
running ?
"- ikabopo -" <ikabopo@webtv.net > wrote in message =
news:29130-494A05BB-251@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net...
> ..you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not =
this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>=20
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This =
is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I =
bet
> there are very few.
>=20
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>=20
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>=20
> -ikabopo-
>
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:50:00
From: FangBanger
Subject: now repost if you lied
|
I will bet that 70% of the above are lying
_____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:39:25
From: John_Brian_K
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Well I dont like to brag but.....
========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
========
BOOM byae
John
____________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:37:39
From: bgadams
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 4:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Are you the IRS??
-------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:30:28
From: Wayne Vinson
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 2:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> ...you have profited $10.000.00 or more at poker in your life. Not this
> year, or last year, or any given year, but just total in your life.
>
> I'm trying to achieve a count of RGPers who have achieved this. This is
> a pittance of an accomplishment, but if the responses are honest, I bet
> there are very few.
>
> And don't respond if you "think" you have profited this much. Only
> respond if you actually keep records and know EXACTLY how much you are
> ahead at poker. You don't have to reveal the amount, but only respond
> if you have a figure that you know is a fact, and you know it is over
> $10,000.00.
>
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> -ikabopo-
Long since.
Wayne Vinson
http://cardsharp.org/
Wayne (dot) Vinson (at) gmail (dot) com
----
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 06:50:16
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 2:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
In.
---
Morphy
xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
"SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio
____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:47:41
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 8:50 AM, XaQ Morphy wrote:
> On Dec 18 2008 2:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
>
> > Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> In.
TEHEE.. HONKEE PULLEEEZEE!!
>
> ---
> Morphy
> xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
> http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
> "SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire
_______________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:53:43
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 9:47 AM, FangBanger wrote:
> TEHEE.. HONKEE PULLEEEZEE!!
You've tried this troll at least 3 times and failed miserably in all
attempts. I'm not really in the mood for fetch today so you'll have to go
find someone else to walk you and clean up after you.
---
Morphy
xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
"SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio
_______________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 10:00:50
From: FangBanger
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 9:53 AM, XaQ Morphy wrote:
> On Dec 18 2008 9:47 AM, FangBanger wrote:
>
> > TEHEE.. HONKEE PULLEEEZEE!!
>
> You've tried this troll at least 3 times and failed miserably in all
> attempts. I'm not really in the mood for fetch today so you'll have to go
> find someone else to walk you and clean up after you.
RATS.. just when I had you all trained up !!
>
> ---
> Morphy
> xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
> http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
> "SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Voltaire
----
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 10:46:56
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 12:00 PM, FangBanger wrote:
> RATS.. just when I had you all trained up !!
Exactly.
---
Morphy
xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
"SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio
----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:04:12
From: Paul Popinjay
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
"XaQ Morphy" <a1c5905@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:8i4q16x23s.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Dec 18 2008 2:11 AM, - ikabopo - wrote:
>
>> Consider me on this list. Because I am.
>
> In.
>
That guy has a really weird screen name. What is an 'ikabopo' anyway? Does
it mean something?
It sounds really dumb. Don't you agree, uhh, XaQ Morphy?
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Dec 2008 07:20:04
From: XaQ Morphy
Subject: Re: PLEASE: Only respond if:
|
On Dec 18 2008 9:04 AM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> That guy has a really weird screen name. What is an 'ikabopo' anyway? Does
> it mean something?
I'm sure it does to someone.
> It sounds really dumb. Don't you agree, uhh, XaQ Morphy?
Hey I get it! Actually the XaQ Morphy name will be celebrating its 20th
birthday this year. I came up with it when I was 16 (those of you on the
math side of poker should be able to use this vital info to deduce my age)
when a friend of mine and I were starting a band and of course needed
stage names.
So umm, there it is. Not as impressive as the Popinjay title obviously,
but impressive to me at least.
---
Morphy
xaqmorphy@donkeymanifesto.com
http://www.donkeymanifesto.com
"SHUT UP IDIOT" --The Great Patholio
------
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
|
