| |
Main
Date: 17 Jan 2009 17:31:40
From: MZB
Subject: Israeli cease fire
|
Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
We shall see what happens.
Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished their
aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
significant gains politically.
Hard to call a "winner"here.
The hostilities will continue for sure.
Mel
|
|
| |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 13:31:19
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 17 2009 5:31 PM, MZB wrote:
> Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
>
> We shall see what happens.
>
> Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished their
> aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
>
> Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> significant gains politically.
>
> Hard to call a "winner"here.
>
> The hostilities will continue for sure.
Of course Israel accomplished their objective – terrorizing an already
captive population. It was a naked display of power, nothing more. There
were no military objectives.
Mission accomplished.
______________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 17:40:43
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18 2009 4:31 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> On Jan 17 2009 5:31 PM, MZB wrote:
>
> > Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
> >
> > We shall see what happens.
> >
> > Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished
their
> > aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
> >
> > Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> > significant gains politically.
> >
> > Hard to call a "winner"here.
> >
> > The hostilities will continue for sure.
>
> Of course Israel accomplished their objective – terrorizing an already
> captive population. It was a naked display of power, nothing more. There
> were no military objectives.
>
> Mission accomplished.
Who fired the first shot ?
Atheism is drawing dead
------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 22:44:47
From: Howard Beale
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
IMO, it was predictable that Israel would stop military action in time for
Obama's inauguration. I have read nothing about troop withdrawal. If the
Egyptians can be made to enforce an anti-smuggling agreement there may be
peace for a while, but just for a while. I don't think there will be an
Israeli/Palestinian peace in my lifetime. Too many vested interests, too
much regional posturing and maneuvering. GL to Obama trying his hand at
it. Everybody needs a hobby.
Howard Beale
-------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 12:37:31
From: MZB
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
Yes, I totally agree. Risky's fanatics will never embrace or accept peace
for any length of time.
Bastards!
Mel
"Howard Beale" <a1695@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:vnva46xem1.ln2@recgroups.com...
> IMO, it was predictable that Israel would stop military action in time for
> Obama's inauguration. I have read nothing about troop withdrawal. If the
> Egyptians can be made to enforce an anti-smuggling agreement there may be
> peace for a while, but just for a while. I don't think there will be an
> Israeli/Palestinian peace in my lifetime. Too many vested interests, too
> much regional posturing and maneuvering. GL to Obama trying his hand at
> it. Everybody needs a hobby.
>
>
>
> Howard Beale
>
> -------
> looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
>
>
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 10:44:48
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18 2009 10:37 AM, MZB wrote:
> Yes, I totally agree. Risky's fanatics will never embrace or accept peace
> for any length of time.
>
> Bastards!
>
> Mel
Yeah, it is pretty fanatical of them to want to be able to provide more
than one meal a day for their children, isn't it, Mel? On the other hand,
the Israeli nazis causing that are sweetness and light.
Sick.
> "Howard Beale" <a1695@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:vnva46xem1.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > IMO, it was predictable that Israel would stop military action in time for
> > Obama's inauguration. I have read nothing about troop withdrawal. If the
> > Egyptians can be made to enforce an anti-smuggling agreement there may be
> > peace for a while, but just for a while. I don't think there will be an
> > Israeli/Palestinian peace in my lifetime. Too many vested interests, too
> > much regional posturing and maneuvering. GL to Obama trying his hand at
> > it. Everybody needs a hobby.
> >
> >
> >
> > Howard Beale
> >
_____________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 15:09:28
From: MZB
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
Oh, yeah, Hamas sure is concerned about the welfare of their citizens!!!
Your denseness is immeasurable.
Mel
"risky biz" <risky-biz@sbcglobal.net > wrote in message
news:0u9c46x04a.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Jan 18 2009 10:37 AM, MZB wrote:
>
>> Yes, I totally agree. Risky's fanatics will never embrace or accept peace
>> for any length of time.
>>
>> Bastards!
>>
>> Mel
>
> Yeah, it is pretty fanatical of them to want to be able to provide more
> than one meal a day for their children, isn't it, Mel? On the other hand,
> the Israeli nazis causing that are sweetness and light.
>
> Sick.
>
>
>> "Howard Beale" <a1695@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:vnva46xem1.ln2@recgroups.com...
>> > IMO, it was predictable that Israel would stop military action in time
>> > for
>> > Obama's inauguration. I have read nothing about troop withdrawal. If
>> > the
>> > Egyptians can be made to enforce an anti-smuggling agreement there may
>> > be
>> > peace for a while, but just for a while. I don't think there will be
>> > an
>> > Israeli/Palestinian peace in my lifetime. Too many vested interests,
>> > too
>> > much regional posturing and maneuvering. GL to Obama trying his hand
>> > at
>> > it. Everybody needs a hobby.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Howard Beale
>> >
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
>
>
|
| | | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 18:19:24
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18 2009 1:09 PM, MZB wrote:
> Oh, yeah, Hamas sure is concerned about the welfare of their citizens!!!
>
> Your denseness is immeasurable.
>
> Mel
You really don't have anything intelligent to say at all, do you Mel? All
you do is puppetmouth the obvious Israeli lies. You depend wholly on the
one-sided false image of the Middle East painted in the American news
media and by your Democratic Party.
---
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 13:35:26
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18 2009 3:09 PM, MZB wrote:
> Oh, yeah, Hamas sure is concerned about the welfare of their citizens!!!
>
> Your denseness is immeasurable.
..says the guy who fully, uncritically supports state-sponsored terrorism
and an ongoing war crime.
_____________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 17:17:46
From: MZB
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
You are wrong.
I am very much against our Iraqi excursion.
I don't think Iraq was sending missiles our way.
Mel
"ChrisRobin" <a9dbf1e@webnntp.invalid > wrote in message
news:utjc46x31b.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Jan 18 2009 3:09 PM, MZB wrote:
>
>> Oh, yeah, Hamas sure is concerned about the welfare of their citizens!!!
>>
>> Your denseness is immeasurable.
>
> ..says the guy who fully, uncritically supports state-sponsored terrorism
> and an ongoing war crime.
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
>
>
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 18:25:50
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18 2009 3:17 PM, MZB wrote:
> You are wrong.
>
> I am very much against our Iraqi excursion.
>
> I don't think Iraq was sending missiles our way.
>
> Mel
The Republican and Democratic Parties decided to attack Iraq to please
Israel because our ability to starve them was in danger of slipping away.
Lesley Stahl on CBS's 60 Minutes. When asked by Stahl with regards to
effect of sanctions against Iraq: "We have heard that half a million
children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima.
And, you know, is the price worth it?"
Madeleine Albright replied: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the
price — we think the price is worth it."
But, Mel, I must say that your "liberalness" is edifying. You didn't want
to bomb Iraq, just keep starving them. It's only the Palestinians that you
want to both starve AND bomb.
____________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 19 Jan 2009 21:14:04
From: Joe Long
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
risky biz wrote:
> The Republican and Democratic Parties decided to attack Iraq to please
> Israel because our ability to starve them was in danger of slipping away.
>
> Lesley Stahl on CBS's 60 Minutes. When asked by Stahl with regards to
> effect of sanctions against Iraq: "We have heard that half a million
> children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima.
> And, you know, is the price worth it?"
>
> Madeleine Albright replied: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the
> price — we think the price is worth it."
>
> But, Mel, I must say that your "liberalness" is edifying. You didn't want
> to bomb Iraq, just keep starving them. It's only the Palestinians that you
> want to both starve AND bomb.
As usual you drink the kool-aid, and repeat this crap out of context.
It was not the U.S. or our allies who were starving children in Iraq.
We even let them sell oil in the infamous "oil for food" program to
PREVENT that -- which Saddam immediately corrupted. Iraqis were being
starved by their own government, much as the misery of the Palestinians
in Gaza is being caused and prolonged by the actions of Hamas.
--
Joe Long aka ChipRider
Somewhere on the Range
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 19 Jan 2009 21:12:56
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 19 2009 9:14 PM, Joe Long wrote:
> risky biz wrote:
>
> > The Republican and Democratic Parties decided to attack Iraq to please
> > Israel because our ability to starve them was in danger of slipping away.
> >
> > Lesley Stahl on CBS's 60 Minutes. When asked by Stahl with regards to
> > effect of sanctions against Iraq: "We have heard that half a million
> > children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima.
> > And, you know, is the price worth it?"
> >
> > Madeleine Albright replied: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the
> > price — we think the price is worth it."
> >
> > But, Mel, I must say that your "liberalness" is edifying. You didn't want
> > to bomb Iraq, just keep starving them. It's only the Palestinians that you
> > want to both starve AND bomb.
>
> As usual you drink the kool-aid, and repeat this crap out of context.
>
> It was not the U.S. or our allies who were starving children in Iraq.
> We even let them sell oil in the infamous "oil for food" program to
> PREVENT that -- which Saddam immediately corrupted. Iraqis were being
> starved by their own government, much as the misery of the Palestinians
> in Gaza is being caused and prolonged by the actions of Hamas.
>
>
> --
> Joe Long aka ChipRider
> Somewhere on the Range
You display the classic behavior of a serial killer who blames his victims
and describes them as the guilty party. Don't worry, though- that's
normative in imperialist cultures.
-------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 06:45:10
From: FL Turbo
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:12:56 -0800, "risky biz"
<risky-biz@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
>On Jan 19 2009 9:14 PM, Joe Long wrote:
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> It was not the U.S. or our allies who were starving children in Iraq.
>> We even let them sell oil in the infamous "oil for food" program to
>> PREVENT that -- which Saddam immediately corrupted. Iraqis were being
>> starved by their own government, much as the misery of the Palestinians
>> in Gaza is being caused and prolonged by the actions of Hamas.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joe Long aka ChipRider
>> Somewhere on the Range
>
>You display the classic behavior of a serial killer who blames his victims
>and describes them as the guilty party. Don't worry, though- that's
>normative in imperialist cultures.
>
"imperialist" ?
Are you a Marxist too, as well as being a supporter of IslamoNazi
terrorism?
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 07:09:45
From: Neverchop
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
"FL Turbo" <noemail@notime.com > wrote in message
news:dlhbn4t7uegpv1tdb07ikr8a72k83srjv1@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:12:56 -0800, "risky biz"
> <risky-biz@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >You display the classic behavior of a serial killer who blames his
victims
> >and describes them as the guilty party. Don't worry, though- that's
> >normative in imperialist cultures.
> >
>
> "imperialist" ?
> Are you a Marxist too, as well as being a supporter of IslamoNazi
> terrorism?
Your quick Francis.
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 19:49:43
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
"MZB" <moo@noway.prudigy.net > wrote in message
news:mUNcl.97850$4M4.84041@newsfe02.iad...
> You are wrong.
>
> I am very much against our Iraqi excursion.
>
> I don't think Iraq was sending missiles our way.
>
> Mel
No, they were just firing them, repeatedly, at our aircraft.
Irish Mike
> "ChrisRobin" <a9dbf1e@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:utjc46x31b.ln2@recgroups.com...
>> On Jan 18 2009 3:09 PM, MZB wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, yeah, Hamas sure is concerned about the welfare of their citizens!!!
>>>
>>> Your denseness is immeasurable.
>>
>> ..says the guy who fully, uncritically supports state-sponsored terrorism
>> and an ongoing war crime.
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
>>
>>
>
>
|
| |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 19:23:39
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 17 2009 3:31 PM, MZB wrote:
> Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
>
> We shall see what happens.
>
> Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished their
> aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
>
> Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> significant gains politically.
>
> Hard to call a "winner"here.
>
> The hostilities will continue for sure.
>
> Mel
Very insightful analysis, Mel, but you forgot to whine about the 13
Israelis who died, or at least the 10 who were nazis.
______________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 20 Jan 2009 03:08:22
From: Deadmoney Walking
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 17, 10:23=A0pm, "risky biz" <risky-...@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
> On Jan 17 2009 3:31 PM, MZB wrote:
>
> > Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
>
> > We shall see what happens.
>
> > Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished t=
heir
> > aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
>
> > Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> > significant gains politically.
>
> > Hard to call a "winner"here.
>
> > The hostilities will continue for sure.
>
> > Mel
>
> Very insightful analysis, Mel, but you forgot to whine about the 13
> Israelis who died, or at least the 10 who were nazis.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________=A0
> : the next generation of web-newsreaders :http://www.recgroups.com
Some Hamas men claimed victory. I believe part of Japan has not yet
surrendered.
|
| | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 02:20:28
From: bub
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:23:39 -0800, "risky biz"
<risky-biz@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
>
>Very insightful analysis, Mel, but you forgot to whine about the 13
>Israelis who died, or at least the 10 who were nazis.
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
oops guess hamas needs lessons on how to fire missiles
don't go to war with someone who knows how to fire and aim missiles
better than u
nuff said
|
| | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 00:01:45
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:23:39 -0800, "risky biz"
<risky-biz@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
>Very insightful analysis, Mel, but you forgot to whine about the 13
>Israelis who died, or at least the 10 who were nazis.
If a retard chooses to attack you with a pen-knife you aren't
obligated to drop your gun and try to defend yourself with your fists.
You can blast them into bloody hamburger with an Uzi.
Hamas is shit. They deliberately provoked this shit in order to get
their own citizens killed, so they can then portray themselves as
victims. It's just too bad the citizens who presumably voted for them
hoping for a better government than the corrupt, incompetent Fatah
turds instead get the place they live in flattened.
But morons who launch utterly useless rockets at a vastly superior
military force have no room to complain when the inevitable result of
their stupidity occurs. Israel has no obligation to just sit there
while retards lob rockets at them day after day.
|
| | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 09:45:34
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 17 2009 10:01 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:23:39 -0800, "risky biz"
> <risky-biz@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >Very insightful analysis, Mel, but you forgot to whine about the 13
> >Israelis who died, or at least the 10 who were nazis.
>
> If a retard chooses to attack you with a pen-knife you aren't
> obligated to drop your gun and try to defend yourself with your fists.
> You can blast them into bloody hamburger with an Uzi.
>
> Hamas is shit. They deliberately provoked this shit in order to get
> their own citizens killed, so they can then portray themselves as
> victims. It's just too bad the citizens who presumably voted for them
> hoping for a better government than the corrupt, incompetent Fatah
> turds instead get the place they live in flattened.
>
> But morons who launch utterly useless rockets at a vastly superior
> military force have no room to complain when the inevitable result of
> their stupidity occurs. Israel has no obligation to just sit there
> while retards lob rockets at them day after day.
So it's "retarded" to strike back against someone who establishes what is,
by any honest description, a concentration camp and then starves you to
death with a famine seige? What would Americans do if their country was
surrounded and incoming and outgoing commerce reduced to 15% of normal
levels? Would you advocate that Americans do nothing in a situation like
that? Answer that question.
________________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 15:02:34
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:45:34 -0800, "risky biz"
<risky-biz@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
>On Jan 17 2009 10:01 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
>> But morons who launch utterly useless rockets at a vastly superior
>> military force have no room to complain when the inevitable result of
>> their stupidity occurs. Israel has no obligation to just sit there
>> while retards lob rockets at them day after day.
>So it's "retarded" to strike back against someone who establishes what is,
>by any honest description, a concentration camp and then starves you to
>death with a famine seige? What would Americans do if their country was
>surrounded and incoming and outgoing commerce reduced to 15% of normal
>levels? Would you advocate that Americans do nothing in a situation like
>that? Answer that question.
Hamas' actions have negative expected value for their people. Thus,
they are stupid. Their actions have zero chance of success and
virtually certain chance of causing massive retaliation. People
elected to lead a country who instead get it flattened are morons.
Hamas, in particular, are evil morons.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 18:05:43
From: risky biz
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18 2009 1:02 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:45:34 -0800, "risky biz"
> <risky-biz@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >On Jan 17 2009 10:01 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
>
> >> But morons who launch utterly useless rockets at a vastly superior
> >> military force have no room to complain when the inevitable result of
> >> their stupidity occurs. Israel has no obligation to just sit there
> >> while retards lob rockets at them day after day.
>
> >So it's "retarded" to strike back against someone who establishes what is,
> >by any honest description, a concentration camp and then starves you to
> >death with a famine seige? What would Americans do if their country was
> >surrounded and incoming and outgoing commerce reduced to 15% of normal
> >levels? Would you advocate that Americans do nothing in a situation like
> >that? Answer that question.
>
> Hamas' actions have negative expected value for their people. Thus,
> they are stupid. Their actions have zero chance of success and
> virtually certain chance of causing massive retaliation. People
> elected to lead a country who instead get it flattened are morons.
> Hamas, in particular, are evil morons.
And the ones dropping the bombs on women, children, hospitals, and
sanitation facilities are blessed geniuses? Are the Israelis blessed
geniuses because they have been imposing a famine siege on the
Palestinians for the last year and a half? Sounds familiar.
--------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 13:33:02
From: ChrisRobin
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18 2009 3:02 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:45:34 -0800, "risky biz"
> <risky-biz@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >On Jan 17 2009 10:01 PM, A Man Beaten by Jacks wrote:
>
> >> But morons who launch utterly useless rockets at a vastly superior
> >> military force have no room to complain when the inevitable result of
> >> their stupidity occurs. Israel has no obligation to just sit there
> >> while retards lob rockets at them day after day.
>
> >So it's "retarded" to strike back against someone who establishes what is,
> >by any honest description, a concentration camp and then starves you to
> >death with a famine seige? What would Americans do if their country was
> >surrounded and incoming and outgoing commerce reduced to 15% of normal
> >levels? Would you advocate that Americans do nothing in a situation like
> >that? Answer that question.
>
> Hamas' actions have negative expected value for their people. Thus,
> they are stupid. Their actions have zero chance of success and
> virtually certain chance of causing massive retaliation. People
> elected to lead a country who instead get it flattened are morons.
> Hamas, in particular, are evil morons.
So you're willing to overlook the fact that the Palestinians are
essentially captives? Seems to me that's kind of an important part of the
equation.
-------
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 20:44:02
From: mb_
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 17, 10:23=A0pm, "risky biz" <risky-...@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
> On Jan 17 2009 3:31 PM, MZB wrote:
>
> > Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
>
> > We shall see what happens.
>
> > Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished t=
heir
> > aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
>
> > Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> > significant gains politically.
>
> > Hard to call a "winner"here.
>
> > The hostilities will continue for sure.
>
> > Mel
>
> Very insightful analysis, Mel, but you forgot to whine about the 13
> Israelis who died, or at least the 10 who were nazis.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________=A0
> : the next generation of web-newsreaders :http://www.recgroups.com
I think Nazis might be YOUR term.
I'm glad you found my analysis edifying
Mel
|
| |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 15:22:56
From: La Cosa Nostradamus
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
Fighting Israel is all the wakkos over there think about. What else do
they have to occupy themselves ? Oil, fight Israel, thats it. We need to
airdrop playstations over there.
On Jan 17 2009 5:31 PM, MZB wrote:
> Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
>
> We shall see what happens.
>
> Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished their
> aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
>
> Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> significant gains politically.
>
> Hard to call a "winner"here.
>
> The hostilities will continue for sure.
>
> Mel
Atheism is drawing dead
______________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 22:30:08
From: mb_
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 18, 12:09=A0am, "Irish Mike" <mjos...@ameritech.net > wrote:
> "A Man Beaten by Jacks" <nob...@fool.foo> wrote in messagenews:1ld5n418s0=
nlhu2orakfet2i7rvuqup0ko@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:31:31 -0800, "poorolrich"
> > <abc8...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>Well, Israel issued a cease fire, for 10 days I think but, Hamas, has s=
aid
> >>'no way'. =A0 You would think Hamas could go along with this to see wha=
t is
> >>going to happen. =A0I guess they really don't care about the citizens i=
n
> >>Gaza that voted them in.
>
> > Hamas eats shit.
>
> > I have zero sympathy for these shitstains. =A0They need to die.
>
> > Too bad there are otherwise innocent people who just happen to live in
> > the area.
>
> > Unlike the Lebanon situation, the Hamas vermin are actually the
> > government of what Israel is attacking. =A0So the people who voted for
> > these Hamas turds are getting what they voted for. =A0Fuck them.
>
> Holy Shit! =A0Jacks and I just agree on something. =A0Quick, some one loo=
k out
> side and see if a star rose in the East.
>
> Irish Mike- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Me, you, and Jacks!!! Amazing.
Mel
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 19:30:15
From: Deadmoney Walking
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Jan 17, 9:31=A0pm, "poorolrich" <abc8...@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
> Well, Israel issued a cease fire, for 10 days I think but, Hamas, has sai=
d
> 'no way'. =A0 You would think Hamas could go along with this to see what =
is
> going to happen. =A0I guess they really don't care about the citizens in
> Gaza that voted them in. =A0
>
> On Jan 18 2009 5:22 AM, La =A0Cosa =A0Nostradamus wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Fighting Israel is all the wakkos over there think about. What else do
> > they have to occupy themselves ? Oil, fight Israel, thats it. We need t=
o
> > airdrop playstations over there.
> > On Jan 17 2009 5:31 PM, MZB wrote:
>
> > > Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
>
> > > We shall see what happens.
>
> > > Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished
> their
> > > aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
>
> > > Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> > > significant gains politically.
>
> > > Hard to call a "winner"here.
>
> > > The hostilities will continue for sure.
>
> > > Mel
>
> > Atheism is drawing dead
>
> -------=A0
> RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader :www.recgroups.com- Hide qu=
oted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hamas is going to claim victory somehow. Hezbolah claimed it two
years ago. Heck, the British think they won at Dunkirk.
|
| | |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 18:31:31
From: poorolrich
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
Well, Israel issued a cease fire, for 10 days I think but, Hamas, has said
'no way'. You would think Hamas could go along with this to see what is
going to happen. I guess they really don't care about the citizens in
Gaza that voted them in.
On Jan 18 2009 5:22 AM, La Cosa Nostradamus wrote:
> Fighting Israel is all the wakkos over there think about. What else do
> they have to occupy themselves ? Oil, fight Israel, thats it. We need to
> airdrop playstations over there.
> On Jan 17 2009 5:31 PM, MZB wrote:
>
> > Israel has agreed to a cease fire, unilaterally.
> >
> > We shall see what happens.
> >
> > Israel clearly won militarily, but I doubt if they truly accomplished
their
> > aim of eliminating the rocket attacks.
> >
> > Hamas lost this War and many of their leaders, but they have made
> > significant gains politically.
> >
> > Hard to call a "winner"here.
> >
> > The hostilities will continue for sure.
> >
> > Mel
>
>
> Atheism is drawing dead
-------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
|
| | | |
Date: 17 Jan 2009 23:58:56
From: A Man Beaten by Jacks
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:31:31 -0800, "poorolrich"
<abc87d4@webnntp.invalid > wrote:
>Well, Israel issued a cease fire, for 10 days I think but, Hamas, has said
>'no way'. You would think Hamas could go along with this to see what is
>going to happen. I guess they really don't care about the citizens in
>Gaza that voted them in.
Hamas eats shit.
I have zero sympathy for these shitstains. They need to die.
Too bad there are otherwise innocent people who just happen to live in
the area.
Unlike the Lebanon situation, the Hamas vermin are actually the
government of what Israel is attacking. So the people who voted for
these Hamas turds are getting what they voted for. Fuck them.
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 08:31:06
From: DaVoice
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
"A Man Beaten by Jacks" <nobody@fool.foo > wrote in message
news:1ld5n418s0nlhu2orakfet2i7rvuqup0ko@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:31:31 -0800, "poorolrich"
> <abc87d4@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Well, Israel issued a cease fire, for 10 days I think but, Hamas, has said
>>'no way'. You would think Hamas could go along with this to see what is
>>going to happen. I guess they really don't care about the citizens in
>>Gaza that voted them in.
>
> Hamas eats shit.
>
> I have zero sympathy for these shitstains. They need to die.
>
> Too bad there are otherwise innocent people who just happen to live in
> the area.
>
> Unlike the Lebanon situation, the Hamas vermin are actually the
> government of what Israel is attacking. So the people who voted for
> these Hamas turds are getting what they voted for. Fuck them.
I totally agree, they put these fuckers into congress and other positions of
power, then once again, they tried to shoot the elephant that is Israel with
the equivalent of BB guns. Who was it that said "never bring a knife to a
gun fight"?
Hamas should be wiped off of the face of the Earth, and let Iran do it's OWN
dirty work, then we take care of that problem.
--
Rick "ADB DaVoice" Charles
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 02:11:40
From: bub
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:58:56 -0500, A Man Beaten by Jacks
<nobody@fool.foo > wrote:
>
>Hamas eats shit.
>
>I have zero sympathy for these shitstains. They need to die.
>
>Too bad there are otherwise innocent people who just happen to live in
>the area.
>
>Unlike the Lebanon situation, the Hamas vermin are actually the
>government of what Israel is attacking. So the people who voted for
>these Hamas turds are getting what they voted for. Fuck them.
thank you captain obvious
|
| | | | |
Date: 18 Jan 2009 00:09:17
From: Irish Mike
Subject: Re: Israeli cease fire
|
"A Man Beaten by Jacks" <nobody@fool.foo > wrote in message
news:1ld5n418s0nlhu2orakfet2i7rvuqup0ko@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:31:31 -0800, "poorolrich"
> <abc87d4@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Well, Israel issued a cease fire, for 10 days I think but, Hamas, has said
>>'no way'. You would think Hamas could go along with this to see what is
>>going to happen. I guess they really don't care about the citizens in
>>Gaza that voted them in.
>
> Hamas eats shit.
>
> I have zero sympathy for these shitstains. They need to die.
>
> Too bad there are otherwise innocent people who just happen to live in
> the area.
>
> Unlike the Lebanon situation, the Hamas vermin are actually the
> government of what Israel is attacking. So the people who voted for
> these Hamas turds are getting what they voted for. Fuck them.
Holy Shit! Jacks and I just agree on something. Quick, some one look out
side and see if a star rose in the East.
Irish Mike
|
|
